Skip to main content

How Information-Mapping Patterns Determine Foraging Behaviour of a Honey Bee Colony

Open Systems & Information Dynamics volume 9, pages 181–193 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

We have developed a model of foraging behaviour of a honeybee colony based on reaction-diffusion equations and have studied how mapping the information about the explored environment to the hive determines this behaviour. The model utilizes two dominant components of colony's foraging behaviour — the recruitment to the located nectar sources and the abandonment of them. The recruitment is based upon positive feedback, i.e autocatalytic replication of information about the located source. If every potential forager in the hive, the onlooker, acquires information about all located sources, a common information niche is formed, which leads to the rapid selection of the most profitable nectar source. If the onlookers acquire information about some parts of the environment and slowly learn about the other parts, different information niches where individuals are associated mainly with a particular food source are formed, and the correspondent foraging trails coexist for longer periods. When selected nectar source becomes depleted, the foragers switch over to another, more profitable source. The faster the onlookers learn about the entire environment, the faster that switching occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Bibliography

  1. M. R. Belic, V. Skarka, J.-L. Deneubourg, and M. Lax, Mathematical-model of honeycomb construction, Math. Biol. 24, 437 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Goss, S. Aron, J.-L. Deneubourg, and J. M. Pasteels, Self-organized shortcuts in the argentine an, Naturwissenschaften 76, 579 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Cazamine and J. Sneyd, A model of collective nectar source selection by honey-bees — Self-organization through simple rules, J. Theor. Biol. 149, 547 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. J. Cole, Short-term activity cycles in ants — Generation of periodicity by worker interaction, Am. Nat. 137, 244 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Camazine, J. Sneyd, M. J. Jenkins, and J. D. Murray, A mathematical-model of self-organized pattern-formation on the combs of honeybee colonies, J. Theor. Biol. 147, 553 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Bonabeau, G. Theraulaz, and J.-L. Deneubourg, Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies, Bull. Math. Biol. 60, 753 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. D. Seeley, The Wisdom of the Hive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Tereshko, Reaction-diffusion model of a honeybee colony's foraging behaviour, in: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI, M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J. J. Merelo, H.-P. Schwefel, eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1917, Springer, Berlin, 2000, p. 807.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Tereshko, Selection and coexistence by reaction-diffusion dynamics in fitness landscapes, Phys. Lett. A 260, 522 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. D. Seeley and W. F. Towne, Tactics of dance choice in honey-bes — Do foragers compare dances, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 59 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. K. Visscher and S. Camazine, Collective decisions and cognition in bees, Nature 397, 400 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. D. Seeley and S. C. Burhman, Group decision making in swarms of honey bees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45, 19 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Camazine, P. K. Visscher, J. Finley, R. S. Vetter, House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors, Insectes Sociaux 46, 348 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. A. Kauffman, The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.S. Mikhailov, Foundations of Synergetics I, Springer, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.-L. Deneubourg, S. Goss, R. Beckers, and G. Sandini, Collectively Self-Solving Problems, in: Self-Organization, Emergent Properties, and Learning, A. Babloyantz, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1991, p. 267

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.-L. Deneubourg and S. Goss, Collective patterns and decision-making, Ethol. Ecol. and Evol. 1, 295 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Inselstr. 22-26, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Valery Tereshko

  2. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, P.O. Box 94079, 1090 GB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Troy Lee

Authors
  1. Valery Tereshko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Troy Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tereshko, V., Lee, T. How Information-Mapping Patterns Determine Foraging Behaviour of a Honey Bee Colony. Open Systems & Information Dynamics 9, 181–193 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015652810815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015652810815

Keywords

  • Statistical Physic
  • Mechanical Engineer
  • Food Source
  • System Theory
  • Positive Feedback