Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in three Belgian regions. Registration via a network of sentinel general practices

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The objective of this descriptive study is to investigate the incidence of type 2 diabetes in sentinel general practices in three regions in Belgium and to describe the patient characteristics and the start of the medical management after diagnosis. Methods: For two successive years all patients who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were registered. Two weeks after inclusion, the registering physician completed an extensive questionnaire. This questionnaire dealt with risk factors, biochemical parameters, existing complications and treatment. Results: According to this study, the yearly incidence of type 2 diabetes in Belgium is 231 per 100,000 inhabitants. Though the biochemical parameters (BMI, HbA1c, serum cholesterol and triglycerides) do not differ in the three regions of the country being investigated, there are considerable differences in the treatment prescribed for diabetes and its co-morbidity. In Flanders, treatment is usually started with sulphonylurea, in the Walloon provinces with biguanides. Hypolipaemic treatment is also started more frequently in the latter region. In Flanders, hypertension is registered in 51.4% of the newly diagnosed patients with diabetes, which is higher than in the other regions. However, no difference is noted between the different regions in the number of patients with diabetes who are treated for hypertension. Conclusion: A network of sentinel physicians, taking part in voluntary registration, can be helpful in calculating the incidence of a health problem, in particular type 2 diabetes in general practice. The sentinel net can also serve as an instrument for describing patient characteristics and showing how physicians deal with health problems. The regional differences in medical approach that are described require further investigation, mainly with respect to their impact on the patients' outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Casteren V. Epidemiology of measles and mumps in Belgium, 1994–1995. Arch Public Health 1997; 55: 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025. Prevalence, numerical estimates and projections. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(9): 1414–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walckiers D, Van der Veken J, Papoz L, et al. Prevalence of drug-treated diabetes-mellitus in Belgium – results of a study with the collaboration of a network of Pharmacies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 43: 613–619.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wens J, Van Royen P, Denekens J, Nobels F. Diabetes Care in Flanders (letter). Br J Gen Prac 2001; 51(466): 406–407.

    Google Scholar 

  5. UKPDS Group. UKPDS 33: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 837–853.

    Google Scholar 

  6. UKPDS Group. UKPDS 34: E.ect of intensive bloodglucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 854–865.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stratten IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. Br Med J 2000; 321(7258): 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz F. The European denominator project. Comparison and harmonisation of denominator data for primary health care research in countries of the European Community. End Report. Hannover: Medical School, 1994 July.

  9. Lobet M, Stroobants A, Mertens R, Van Casteren V, Walckiers D, Masuy-Stroobants G, Cornelis R. Tool of validation of the network of sentinel general practitioners in the Belgian Health care system. Int J Epidemiol 1987; 16: 612–618.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zorrilla Torras B, Cantero Real JL, Martinez Cortes M. (Study of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in primary care in the community of Madrid using the network of sentinel physicians). Aten Primaria 1997; 20(10): 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colet, van Woezik E. Continuous Morbidity Registration, Sentinel Stations, the Netherlands, Utrecht: Nivel, 1995.

  12. UKPDS study group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylurea or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–853.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wens J. Duiding: ‘Intensieve behandeling van diabetes type 2’. Huisarts Nu (Minerva) 1999; 28: 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F. Screening properties of questionnaires and laboratory testst for the detection of alcohol abuse or dependency in a general practice population. Br J G Pract 2001; 51(464): 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hillier TA, Pedula KL. Characteristics of an adult population with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: The relation of obesity and age of onset. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(9): 1522–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  16. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macro-vascular and micro-vascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 38). Br Med J 1998; 317: 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vermeire E. Duiding. Strikte bloeddrukcontrole bij diabetes type 2 patiënten. Huisarts Nu (Minerva) 1999; 2(3): 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tafforeau J, Van Oyen H, Drieskens S, et al. Statistiques de d00E9;cés en Communauté française pour l'année 1988. (mortality statistics for the French community in the year 1988). Brussel: IHE, 1994. D/1994/2505/26.

  19. American Diabetes Association, Position Statement. Diabetes Care, 2001; 24(S1): 73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Basismeting. In: Experiment met het functioneren van een diabetesdeskundige binnen lokale samenwerkingsinitiatieven voor de thuiszorg. (Experiment concerning the performance of a diabetes educator within a local teamwork area). Report – Universiteit Antwerpen – Universiteit Gent., 2000: 61–75.

  21. UKPDS study group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 1998; 352: 854–865.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wens J. Duiding: Intensieve behandeling van obese diabetes type 2 patiënten. Huisarts Nu (Minerva) 1999; 28: 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Een interdisciplinaire Consensus over het beleid van Niet-Insulinedependente Diabetes Mellitus in Vlaanderen. Diabetes Project Vlaanderen (An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes in Flanders). 1997, p. 16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wens, J., Van Casteren, V., Vermeire, E. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in three Belgian regions. Registration via a network of sentinel general practices. Eur J Epidemiol 17, 743–750 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015627912556

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015627912556

Navigation