Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): Evolution 1992–1996

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: To test the applicability of the appropriateness evaluation protocol (AEP) as a tool for reviewing hospital utilisation. To quantify and to compare the rate of inappropriate admissions and amount of in-hospital days, emphasising the main causes and factors in the hospital associated with inappropriateness during the studied periods of time. Patients and methods: Two retrospective studies were carried out, the first one in 1992, when 2048 clinical histories were analysed, and the second in 1996, with 1099 reviewed histories. The tool used for the evaluation of the level of hospital utilisation is the AEP. Results: The proportion of admissions considered to be inappropriate was 25% (95% CI: 20.8–24.5) in 1992, and 16% (95% CI: 13.8–18.2) in 1996. Premature admission was the most frequent cause of inappropriateness in both periods. The logistic regression model built for the dependent variable admission showed the following variables to be associated to inappropriateness: scheduled admission (OR: 15; 95% CI: 10.8–20.7) and (OR: 10; 95% CI: 6–16.5), weekend admission (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.3–1.2) and (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.2–2.3), for 1992 and 1996, respectively. The rate of inappropriate in-hospital stays in 1992 was 29% (95% CI: 28.3–29.6), and 13.5% (95% CI: 12.7–14.3) in 1996. Hospital organisational problems were the main cause of inappropriate in-hospital days in 1992, and diagnostic/therapeutical tests that could be performed ambulatorily ranked first in 1996. The logistic regression model built for the dependent variable in-hospital days had the following independent variables associated to its inappropriateness: discharge on week-days (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2–1.8) and (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5–0.8) and length of stay (OR: 2; 95% CI: 1.8–2.4) and (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 2.3–2.5), for 1992 and 1996 respectively, among other variables. Conclusion: Periodic checking of the utilisation levels with the application of methods such as the AEP will contribute towards adapting hospital management in the more competitive current setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freire Campo JM, Infante Campos A. Universalización y aseguramiento sanitario en España. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 105: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peiró S, Meneu R, Roselló ML, et al. Validez del protocolo del uso inapropiado de la hospitalización. Med Clin 1996; 107: 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wickizez TM, Wreeler JRC, Feldstein PJ. Does utilization review reduce unnecessary hospital care and contain costs? Med Care 1989; 27: 632–647.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grover PL. Is appropriate hospital care an inevitable component of the health care system? Med Care 1991; 29 (no. 8 Suppl): AS1–AS4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: A technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care 1981; 19: 855–871.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Restuccia JD, Kreger BE, Payne SMC, Gertman PM, Dayno SJ, Lenhart GM. Factors affecting appropriateness of hospital use in Massachussets. Health Care Financ Rev 1986; 8: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winickoff RN, Restuccia JD, Fincke BG, et al. Concurrent application of the appropriateness evaluation protocol to acute admissions in department of veterans affairs medical centers. Med Care 1991; 29 (no. 8 Suppl): 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booth BM, Ludke RL, Wakefield DS, Kern OC, Fisher EM, Ford TW. Nonacute inpatient admissions to department of veterans affairs medical centers. Med Care 1991; 29 (no. 8 Suppl): A40–A50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Apolone G, Fellin G, Tampieri A, et al. Appropriateness of hospital use. Report from an italian study. European J Public Health 1997; 7: 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso J, Muñoz A, Antó JM, appropriateness evaluation protocol group. Use of stay and inactive days in the hospital to assess appropriateness of utilisation in Barcelona, Spain. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 196–201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lang T, Davido A, Logeret H, Meyer L. Appropriateness of admissions: the French experience. Int J qual Health Care 1995; 7: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos-Eggiman B. Hospital utilization reviews under field conditions: Potential and improvements: Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1993; 9: 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Apolone G, Lang T, Lorenzo S. A European project assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization. Int J Qual Health Care 1995; 7: 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chopard P, Peneger TV, Gaspaz JM, et al. Predictors of inappropriate hospital days in a department of internal medicine. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oterino D, Peiró S, Marchan C, Portella E. Inappropriate hospitalization. Reason and determinants. European Journal of Public Health 1996; 6: 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baré ML, Prat A, Lledó R, Asenjo MA, Salleras LI. Adé quation des recettes et des sé jours dans un hôpital universitaire. Revue d'é pidé miologie et de santé publique 1995; 43: 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Navarro-Rubio G. Estudio de la adecuación de los ingresos y las estancias en un hospital de alta tecnologia de Barcelona (tesis). Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Payne SMC, Ash A, Restuccia AD. The role of feedback in reducing medically unnecessary hospital use. Med Care 1991; 29 (no. 8 Suppl): A91–A106.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Restuccia JD. The effect of concurrent feedback in reducing inappropriate hospital utilization. Med Care 1982; 20: 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winickoff RN, Coltin KL, Morgan MM, Buxbam RC, Barnett GO. Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Med Care 1984; 22: 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Epidemiologia clínica. Barcelona: Consulta, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strumwasser Y, Paranjpe NV, Ronis DL, Share D, Sell LJ. Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Med Care 1990; 28: 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rishpon S, Lubachs S, Epstein LM. Reliability of a method of determining the necessity for hospitalization days in Israel. Med Care 1986; 24: 279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davido A, Nicoulet I, Levy A, Lang T. Appropriateness of admissions in an emergency department: Rehability and causes of failure. Qual Assur Health Care 1994; 3: 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Menacho-Viladot A. Revisión de la utilización en el servicio de oftalmologia de un hospital universitario (tesis). Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prat A, Lledó R, Vilella A, et al. Análisis de la concordancia en la aplicación de un protocolo de adecuaciñn de ingresos hospitalarios. VII Jornadas sobre optimizació n en los servicios sanitarios. EADA, 1992.

  27. Lorenzo S. Métodos de revisión de utilización de recursos: Limitaciones. Med Clin (Barc) 1996; 107: 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramos A, Marión J, Garcia-Martin M, et al. Use of the appropriateness evaluation protocol: The role of medical records quality the effect of completeness of medical records on the determination of appropriateness of hospital days. Int J Qual Health Care 1995; 7: 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peiró S. La revisión del uso inapropiado de la hospitalizaciñn en España. Puntexpress 1994; 128: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meneu R, Peiró S. La revisión del uso inapropiado de la hospitalización en España: ¿de la comunicación científica a la utilización práctica? Todo Hospital 1997; 134: 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lorenzo S. Revisión de la utilización de recursos: Estudios realizados en España. Rev Calidad asistencial 1997; 12: 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peiró S, Meneu R. Uso inapropiado de la hospitalizacioó Problemas en los diseños muestrales. Gaceta Sanitaria 1997; 11: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Technical Management, Department of Public Health, Spain

    G. Navarro, A. Prat-Marin, MA. Asenjo, A. Trilla & LL. Salleras

  2. Department of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic Medical School, University of Barcelona, Spain

    A. Menacho

Authors
  1. G. Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Prat-Marin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. MA. Asenjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Menacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Trilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. LL. Salleras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navarro, G., Prat-Marin, A., Asenjo, M. et al. Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): Evolution 1992–1996. Eur J Epidemiol 17, 679–684 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015563618836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015563618836

Keywords

Search

Navigation