Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative determination of tumor cell intravasation in a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tumor cells acquire the ability to enter blood vessels surrounding the primary tumor, endowing them with the capacity to disseminate and become established in distant sites, originating a metastasis. Determination of the intravasation ability of tumor cells is thus important, as it can be correlated with their potential malignancy. To analyze the intravasation phenotype of human tumor cells in vivo, we performed chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays. Cells were inoculated on the CAM of 9-day-old chick embryos and the membrane at the opposite side of the egg was recovered after 48 h incubation. To measure intravasation ability, we calculated the amount of human DNA in each CAM sample by real-time PCR of Alu sequences and SYBR Green I fluorescence detection. This analysis showed a detection limit of 1 human cell per 105 total cells, and we were able to distinguish between tumor cells of distinct invasive capacity. This assay has several advantages over current methods to measure intravasation ability, including the elimination of post-PCR analysis, sensitivity and easy scale-up of sample numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liotta L, Stracke M. Tumor invasion and metastasis: Biochemical mechanisms.Cancer Treat Res1988;40:223–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohn E, Liotta L. Molecular insights into cancer invasion: strategies for prevention and intervention. Cancer Res 1995;55:1856–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Quigley J, Armstrong P. Tumor cell intravasation Alu-cidated: The chick embryo opens the window.Cell 1998;94:281–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Kharbanda S, McLeskey S et al. Overexpression of fi-broblasts growth factor 1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells facilitates tumor cell dissemination but does not support the development of macrometastases in the lungs or lymph nodes.Cancer Res1999;59: 5023–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall S, Thompson T. Spontaneous but not experimental metastasis activities differentiate primary tumor-derived vs. metastasis-derived mouse prostate cancer cell lines.Clin Exp Metastasis1997;15:630–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson BM. Patten's Foundations of Embryology.New York: McGraw-Hill 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao R, Farnebo J, Kurimoto M et al. Interleukin-18 acts as an angiogenesis and tumor suppressor.FASEB J1999;13:2195–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jia L, Wu C, Guo W et al. Antiangiogenic effects of S-nitrosocaptopril crystals as a nitric oxide donor.Eur J Pharmacol2000;391:137–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vacca A, Iurlaro M, Ribatti D et al. Antiangiogenesis is produced by nontoxic doses of vinblastine.Blood1999;94:4143–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang B, Zheng J, Aoki M et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling mediates angiogenesis and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in endothelial cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2000;97: 1749–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ribatti D, Leali D, Vacca A et al. In vivo angiogenic activity of urokinase: Role of endogenous fibroblast growth factor-2.J Cell Sci1999; 112:4213–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyu MA, Choi YK, Park BN et al. Over-expression of urokinase receptor in human epidermoid-carcinoma cell line (HEp3) increases tumorigenicity on chorioallantoic membrane and in severe-combinedimmunodeficient mice.Int J Cancer1998;77:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haeckel C, Krueger S, Roessner A. Antisense inhibition of urokinase: effect on malignancy in a human osteosarcoma cell line.Int J Cancer 1998; 77: 153–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi T, Koshida K, Endo Y et al. A chick embryo model for metastatic human prostate cancer.Eur Urol1998;34:154–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks P, Lin JM, French D et al.Subtractive immunization yields monoclonal antibodies that specifically inhibit metastasis.J Cell Biol 1993;122:1351–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto H, Endo Y, Nomura M et al. Assessment of the metastatic ability of rat hepatoma cells in chick embryos by the polymerasechain reaction.Anticancer Res1996;16:413–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J, Yu W, Kovalsky K et al. Requirement for specific proteases in cancer cell intravasation as revealed by a novel semiquantitative PCR-based assay.Cell 1998;94:353–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams RLP. Cell Culture for Biochemists.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Billstrom A, Lecander I, Dagnaes-Hansen F et al. Differential expression of uPA in an aggressive (DU-145) and a nonaggressive (1013L) human prostate cancer xenograft.Prostate1995;26:94–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knox J, Mack C, Powell W et al. Prostate tumor cell invasion: A comparison of orthotopic and ectopic models.Invasion Metastasis1993; 13:325–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mira E, Lacalle R, González MA et al. A role for chemokine receptor transactivation in growth factor signaling.EMBO Rep2001;2:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilia Mira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mira, E., Lacalle, R.A., Gómez-Moutón, C. et al. Quantitative determination of tumor cell intravasation in a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay. Clin Exp Metastasis 19, 313–318 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015563031769

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015563031769

Navigation