Abstract
After a long period of dormancy, Darwin's theory of sexual selection in general, and mate choice in particular, now represents one of the most active fields in evolutionary research. After a brief overview of the history of ideas and a short introduction into the main mechanisms of sexual selection, I discuss some recent theoretical developments and empirical findings in the study of mate choice and review the various current models of mate choice, which can be grossly divided into adaptive models and nonadaptive models. I also examine whether available primate evidence supports various hypotheses concerning mate choice. Although primatologists were long aware that nonhuman primates have preferences for certain mating partners, until recently the functions and evolutionary consequences of their preferences remained obscure. Now there is growing evidence that mate choice decisions provide primates with important direct or indirect benefits. For example, several observations are consistent with the hypothesis that by direct or indirect mate choice female primates lower the risk of infanticide or enhance the chance of producing viable offspring. Nevertheless, there are also significant holes in our knowledge. How the male mandrill, one of Darwin's famous examples, got his brightly colored face, is still unknown.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alberts, S. C. (1999). Paternal kin discrimination in wild baboons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1501–1506.
Anderson, C. (1986). Female age: Male preference and reproductive success in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 7: 305–326.
Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Andersson, M. B., and Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. TREE 11: 53–58.
Arnold, S. J., and Duvall, D. (1994). Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143: 317–348.
Bakker, T. C.M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363: 255–257.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349–368.
Berard, J. D., Nurnberg, P., Epplen, J. T., and Schmidtke, J. (1994). Alternative reproductive tactics and reproductive success in male rhesus macaques. Behaviour 129: 177–201.
Bercovitch, F. B. (1991). Mate selection, consortship formation, and reproductive tactics in adult female savanna baboons. Primates 32: 437–452.
Bercovitch, F.B. (1995).Female cooperation, consortship maintenance, and male mating success in savanna baboons. Anim. Behav. 50: 137–149.
Bercovitch, F. B. (1997). Reproductive strategies of rhesus macaques. Primates 38: 247–263.
Birkhead, T. (2000). Promiscuity. An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Birkhead, T. R., and Mø ller, A. P. (eds.). (1998). Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, London.
Bischof, N. (1985). Das Rä tselÖ dipus. Die biologischenWurzeln des Urkonfliktes von Intimitä t und Autonomie, Piper, Mü nchen.
Boinski, S. (1987). Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 13–21.
Borries, C., Launhardt, K., Epplen, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (1999a). DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 901–904.
Borries, C., Launhardt, K., Epplen, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (1999b). Males as infant protectors in Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) living in multimale groups: Defense pattern, paternity, and sexual behaviour. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 350–356.
Brockman, D. K., and Whitten, P. L. (1996). Reproduction in free-ranging Propithecus verreauxi: Estrus and the relationship between multiple partner matings and fertilization. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100: 57–69.
Brooks, R. (2000). Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67–70.
Brown, J. L. (1997). A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8: 60–65.
Buss, D. (1994). The Evolution of Desire. Strategies of Human Mating, Basic Books, New York.
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–237.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351: 58–60.
Constable, J. L., Ashley, M. V., Goodall, J., and Pusey, A. E. (2001). Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1279–1300.
Cords, M. (1987). Forest guenons and patas monkeys: Male- male competition in one-male groups. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R.W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 98–111.
Cronin, H. (1991). The Ant and the Peacock, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cunningham, E. J. A., and Birkhead, T. R. (1998). Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56: 1311–1321.
Daly, M. (1978). The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112: 771–774.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, John Murray, London. Reprinted in 1998.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1982). Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119: 601–610.
Dixson, A. F. (1983). Observations on the evolution and behavioural significance of ‘sexual skin’ in female primates. Adv. Stud. Behav. 13: 63–106.
Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate Sexuality. Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Human Beings, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dixson, A. F., and Mundy, N. I. (1994). Sexual behavior, sexual swelling, and penile evolution in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 267–280.
Domb, L. G., and Pagel, M. (2001). Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature 410: 204–206.
Drickamer, L. C., Gowaty, P. A., and Holmes, C. M. (2000). Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim. Behav. 59: 371–378.
Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.
Enquist, M., Rosenberg, R. H., and Temrin, H. (1998). The logic of Mé nageà trois. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 609–613.
Etges, W. J. (1996). Sexual selection operating in a wild population of Drosophila robusta. Evolution 50: 2095–2100.
Fedigan, L. M. (1982). Primate Paradigms. Sex Roles and Social Bonds, Eden Press, Montré al.
Fietz, J., Zischler, H., Schwiegk, C., Tomiuk, J., Dausmann, K. H., and Ganzhorn, J. U. (2000). High rates of extra-pair young in the pair-living fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 8–17.
Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen. Rev. 7: 184–192.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gagneux, P., Woodruff, D. S., and Boesch, C. (1997). Furtive mating in female chimpanzees. Nature 387: 358–359.
Garber, P. A. (1997). One for all and breeding for one: Cooperation and competition as a tamarin reproductive strategy. Evol. Anthropol. 5: 187–199.
Gerald, M. S. (2001). Primate colour predicts social status and aggressive outcome. Anim. Behav. 61: 559–566.
Gerloff, U., Hartung, B., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., and Tautz, D. (1999). Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1189–1195.
Gibbons, A. (1992). Barbary macaques challenge theory of female choice. Science 257: 329–330.
Gomendio, M., Harcourt, A. H., and Roldá n, E. R. S. (1998). Sperm competition in mammals. In Birkhead, T. R., and Mø ller, A. P. (eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, London, pp. 667–756.
Gowaty, P. A. (1997). Sexual dialectics, sexual selection and variation in mating behavior. In Gowaty, P. A. (ed.), Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 351–384.
Halliday, T. R., and Arnold, S. J. (1987). Multiple mating by females: A perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim. Behav. 35: 939–941.
Hamilton, W.D., and Zuk, M.(1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds:Arole for parasites? Science 218: 384–387.
Harcourt, A. (1996). Sexual selection in sperm competition in primates:What are male genitalia good for? Evol. Anthropol. 4: 121–129.
Harcourt, A. H., and Stewart, K. L. (1986). High dominance rank in primate groups requires help from others. In Passera, L., and Lachaud, J. P. (eds.), The Individual and Society, I.E.C., Toulouse, pp. 93–100.
Hemelrijk, C. K., Meier, C., and Martin, R. D. (1999). ‘Friendship’ for fitness in chimpanzees? Anim. Behav. 58: 1223–1229.
Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., and Hasegawa, T. (1994). Infanticide in nonhuman primates: Sexual selection and resource competition. In Parmigiani, S., and vom Saal, F. S. (eds.), Infanticide and Parental Care, Harwood, Chur, pp. 137–154.
Holland, B., and Rice, W. R. (1998). Chase-away selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.
Hrdy, S.B. (1981). TheWoman That Never Evolved, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In Bleier, R. (ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, Pergamon, New York, pp. 119–146.
Hrdy, S.B. (1997). Raising Darwin's consciousness. Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 8: 1–49.
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature. A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection, Pantheon, New York.
Hrdy, S. B., and Williams, G. C. (1983). Behavioral biology and the double standard. In Wasser, S. K. (ed.), Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–17.
Huffman, M. A. (1991). Mate selection and partner preferences in female Japanese macaques. In Fedigan, L. M., and Asquith, P. J. (eds.), The Monkeys of Arashiyama. Thirty-Five Years of Research in Japan and in the West, SUNY, New York, pp. 101–116.
Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution, the Modern Synthesis, Allen and Unwin, London.
Janson, C. H. (1984). Female choice and mating system of the brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 65: 177–200.
Janson, C. H. (1986). The mating system as a determinant of social evolution in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). In Else, J. G., and Lee, P. C. (eds.), Primate Ecology and Conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 169–179.
Janson, C. H. (1994). Comparison of mating system across two populations of brown capuchin monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 33: 217.
Jennions, M. D., and Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283–327.
Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D., and Deutsch, J. C. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50: 1382–1391.
Jones, D. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evol. Anthropol. 5: 97–109.
Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Intrasexual selection and testis size in strepsirhine primates. Behav. Ecol. 8: 10–19.
Kappeler, P. M., and van Schaik, C. P. (this issue). The evolution of primate social systems. Int. J. Primatol.
Keddy-Hector, A. C. (1992). Mate choice in non-human primates. Am. Zool. 32: 62–70.
Keller, L., and Reeve, H. K. (1995). Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Behav. 24: 291–315.
Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33–38.
Knapp, L. A., Ha, J. C., and Sackett, G. P. (1996). ParentalMHCantigen sharing and pregnancy wastage in captive pigtailed macaques. J. Reprod. Immun. 32: 73–88.
Knight, C. (1991). Blood Relations: Menstruation and the Origin of Culture, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Kraak, S. B. M., and Bakker, T. C. M. (1998). Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: Attractive males choose big females, which lay larger eggs. Anim. Behav. 56: 859–866.
Kraus, C., Heistermann, M., and Kappeler, P. M. (1999). Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: A subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)? Physiol. Behav. 66: 855–861.
Kuester, J., Paul, A., and Arnemann, J. (1992). Kinship, familiarity and mating avoidance in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim. Behav. 48: 1183–1194.
Launhardt, K., Borries, C., Hardt, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (2001). Paternity analysis of alternative male reproductive routes among the langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) of Ramnagar. Anim. Behav. 61: 53–64.
Manson, J. H. (1992). Measuring female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques. Anim. Behav. 44: 405–416.
Manson, J. H. (1994a). Male aggression: A cost of female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques. Anim. Behav. 48: 473–475.
Manson, J. H. (1994b). Mating patterns, mate choice, and birth season heterosexual relationships in free-ranging rhesus macaques. Primates 35: 417–433.
Manson, J. H. (1995a). Female mate choice in primates. Evol. Anthropol. 3: 192–195.
Manson, J. H. (1995b). Do female rhesus monkeys choose novel males? Am. J. Primatol. 37: 285–296.
Manson, J. H., and Perry, S. E. (1993). Inbreeding avoidance in rhesus monkeys:Whose choice? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 90: 335–344.
Martin, R.D. (1992). Female cycles in relation to paternity in primate societies. In Martin, R.D., Dixson, A. F., and Wickings, E. J. (eds.), Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories, Karger, Basel, pp. 238–274.
Mason, W. A. (1966). Social organization of the South American monkey, Callicebus moloch: A preliminary report. Tulane Stud. Zool. 13: 23–28.
Maynard Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54: 261–279.
Mayr, E. (1972). Sexual selection and natural selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871- 1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 87–104.
Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind. How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Doubleday, New York.
Mø ller, A. P., and Alatalo, R. V. (1999). Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 85–91.
Mø ller, A.P., and Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection:Ameta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151: 174–192.
Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the gradedsignal hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 58: 229–246.
Ohsawa, H., Inoue, M., and Takenaka, O. (1993). Mating strategy and reproductive success of male patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). Primates 34: 533–544.
Palombit, R. A. (1994). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Anim. Behav. 47: 721–723.
Palombit, R. A., Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L. (1997). The adaptive value of “friendships” to female baboons: Experimental and observational evidence. Anim. Behav. 54: 599–614.
Parker, G.A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525–567.
Parker, G.A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decisions. In Bateson, P. P.G. (ed.), Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141–166.
Paul, A. (1998). Von Affen und Menschen. Verhaltensbiologie der Primaten, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Paul, A., Kuester, J., and Arnemann, J. (1992). Maternal rank affects reproductive success of male Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus): Evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 337–341.
Paul, A., Preuschoft, S., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). The other side of the coin: Infanticide and the evolution of affiliate male-infant interactions in Old World primates. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 269–292.
Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K. (1999). The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153: 145- 164.
Pereira, M., and Weiss, M. L. (1991). Female mate choice, male migration, and the threat of infanticide in ringtailed lemurs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 141–152.
Paul Petrie, M. (1994). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371: 598–599.
Plavcan, J. M. (2000). Mating systems, intrasexual competition, and sexual dimorphism in primates. In Lee, P. C. (ed.), Comparative Primate Socioecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241–270.
Price, E. C. (1990). Infant carrying as a courtship strategy of breeding male cotton-top tamarins. Anim. Behav. 40: 784–786.
Price, T. D., Schluter, D., and Heckman, N. E. (1993). Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48: 187–211.
Pusey, A. E. (1990). Mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in nonhuman primates. In Feierman, J. R. (ed.), Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions, Springer, New York, pp. 201–220.
Pusey, A., and Wolf, M. (1996). Inbreeding avoidance in animals. TREE 11: 201–206.
Reichard, U. (1995). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology 100: 99–112.
Ridley, M. (1981). How the peacock got his tail. New Sci. 91: 398–401.
Ridley, M., and Rechten, K. (1981). Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76: 152–161.
Rodriguez-Gironé s, M. A., and Enquist, M. (2001). The evolution of female sexuality. Anim. Behav. 61: 695–704.
Ryan, M. J. (1990). Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 157–195.
Sackett, G. P. (1990). Sires influence fetal death in pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Am. J. Primatol. 20: 13–22.
Sandvik, M., Rosenquist, G., and Berglund, A. (2000). Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2151–2155.
Semple, S., and McComb, K. (2000). Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 707–712.
Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001a). Circannual changes in the secondary sexual ornaments of semifree-ranging male and female mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Am. J. Primatol. 53: 109–121.
Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001b). Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) are associated with gain and loss of alpha status.Horm. Behav. 39: 177–184.
Small, M. F. (1988). Female primate sexual behavior and conception: Are there really sperm to spare? Curr. Anthropol. 29: 81–100.
Small, M. F. (1989). Female choice in nonhuman primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 32: 103–127.
Small, M. F. (1993). Female Choices. Sexual Behavior of Female Primates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Smith, D. G. (1994). Male dominance and reproductive success in a captive group of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour 129: 225–242.
Smith, D. G. (1995). Avoidance of close consanguineous inbreeding in captive groups of rhesus macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 35: 31–40.
Smith, D.G., and Smith, S. (1988). Paternal rank and reproductive success of natal rhesus males. Anim. Behav. 36: 554–562.
Smuts, B. B. (1985). Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, New York.
Smuts, B.B. (1987). Sexual competition and mate choice. In Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 385–399.
Smuts, B. B. (1992). Male aggression against women. An evolutionary perspective. Hum. Nat. 3: 1–44.
Soltis, J., and McElreath, R. (2001). Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. Am. Nat. 158: 519–529.
Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shimizu, K., Nozaki, M., Yanagihara, Y., Domingo-Roura, X., and Takenaka, O. (1997a). Sexual selection in Japanese macaques II: Female mate choice and male- male competition. Anim. Behav. 54: 737–746.
Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shimizu, K., Yanagihara, Y., and Nozaki, M. (1997b). Sexual selection in Japanese macaques I: Female mate choice or male sexual coercion? Anim. Behav. 54: 725–736.
Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shizumi, K., Yanagihara, Y., and Nozaki, M. (1999). Female mating strategy in an enclosed group of Japanese macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 47: 263–278.
Soltis, J., Thomsen, R., Matsubayashi, K., and Takenaka, O. (2000). Infanticide by resident males and female counter-strategies in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 195–202.
Soltis, J., Thomsen, R., and Takenaka, O. (2001). The interaction of male and female reproductive strategies and paternity in wild Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata. Anim. Behav. 62: 485–494.
Stanford, C. B. (1999). The Hunting Apes. Meat Eating and the Origins of Human Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Steenbeek, R. (2000). Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas's langurs. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 153–177.
Strier, K. B. (1997). Mate preferences of wild Muriqui monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides): Reproductive and social correlates. Folia Primatol. 68: 120–133.
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York.
Tardif, S. D., and Bales, K. (1997). Is infant-carrying a courtship strategy in callithrichid primates? Anim. Behav. 53: 1001–1007.
Taub, D.M. (1980).Female choice and mating strategiesamongwild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus L.). In Lindburg, D. G. (ed.), The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 287–344.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871- 1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.
van Noordwijk, M.A., and van Schaik, C.P. (1999).The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Primates 40: 105–130.
van Noordwijk, M. A., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: Adaptations against infanticide? In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 322–360.
van Schaik, C. P. (2000a). Social counterstrategies against infanticide by males in primates and other mammals. In Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Primate Males, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 34–52.
van Schaik, C. P. (2000b). Vulnerability to infanticide by males: Patterns among mammals. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61–71.
van Schaik, C. P., Hodges, J. K., and Nunn, C. L. (2000). Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 361–387.
van Schaik, C. P., and Paul, A. (1996/1997). Male care in primates: Does it ever reflect paternity? Evol. Anthropol. 5: 152–156.
van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1996). Toward an understanding of the orangutan's social system. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.
Watts, D. P. (1990). Ecology of gorillas and its relation to female transfer in mountain gorillas. Int. J. Primatol. 11: 21–45.
Waynforth, D., and Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from lonely hearts advertisements. Behaviour 132: 755–779.
Wedekind, C., and Fü ri, S. (1997). Body odour preferences in men and women: Do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1471–1479.
Wedell, N., and Tregenza, T. (1999). Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53: 620–625.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 123: 222–234.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1984). Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In Lewis, T. (ed.), Insect Communication, Academic Press, New York, pp. 283–324.
Westermarck, E. (1891). The History of Human Marriage, Macmillan, London.
Whitten, P. L. (1987). Infants and adult males. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–357.
Wickings, E. J., Bossi, T., and Dixson, A. F. (1993). Reproductive success in the mandrill, Mandrillus sphinx: Correlations of male dominance and mating success with paternity, as determined by DNA fingerprinting. J. Zool. 231: 563–574.
Wickings, E. J., and Dixson, A. F. (1992). Testicular function, secondary sexual development, and social status in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Physiol. Behav. 52: 909–916.
Wickler, W. (1967). Socio-sexual signals and their intra-specific imitation among primates. In Morris, D. (ed.), Primate Ethology,Weidenfield and Nicholson, London, pp. 69–147.
Widemo, F., and Sæ ther, S. A. (1999). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. TREE 14: 26–31.
Wiley, R. H., and Poston, J. (1996). Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50: 1371–1381.
Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C., and Crymes, L. (1998). Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391: 276–279.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.
Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (1996). The evolution of polyandry I: Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1711–1717.
Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (1997). The evolution of polyandry II: Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 69–75.
Zinner, D., and Deschner, T. (2000). Sexual swellings in female hamadryas baboons after male take-overs: “deceptive” swellings as a possible female counter-strategy against infanticide. Am. J. Primatol. 52: 157–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, A. Sexual Selection and Mate Choice. International Journal of Primatology 23, 877–904 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015533100275
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015533100275