Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Averaging Operators in Fuzzy Optimization of Reservoir Operation

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuzzy multiobjective decision makingmodels generally rely on the aggregation of theobjectives to form a decision function. The generalizedaveraging operator is usually adopted for aggregatingmultiple and unequal objectives because it allows trade-off amongst the objectives, and has been shown to besuitable to model human decision making behavior. In thefield of water resource management, most of the decision-making problems involving the generalized averagingoperator implicitly assume the decision maker (DM) israther optimistic. The analysis of the DM's behaviorduring the aggregation process and its impact on theperformance of the system, has therefore never beenaddressed by many researchers and decision makers. Theaim of this paper is to investigate the relationshipbetween decision makers' index of optimism and the long-term performance of a reservoir resource. Morespecifically, the generalized averaging operator, whoseparameter can be interpreted as the DM's index ofoptimism, is imbedded into a fuzzy stochastic dynamicprogram (FSDP). This approach is developed andimplemented to derive optimal operating policies for thehydroelectric complex of the Uruguay River basin inSouthern Brazil. FSDP-derived policies with differentindices of optimism are then compared with simulation. Weshow that system performance may be influenced by thedecision maker's behavior during the aggregation, andthat the optimistic assumption may not yield tosatisfactory results, especially during critical timeperiods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bárdossy, A., Bogardi, I. and Duckstein, L.: 1991,‘ Fuzzy regression in hydrology’, Water Resources Research 26(7), 1497–1508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. and Zadeh, L.: 1970, ‘Decision making in fuzzy environment’, Manage. Sci. 17(4), 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPEL-Centro de Pesquisas de Energia Eléctrica: 1999, Determinacão de Coordenacão da Operacão a Curto Prazo (DECOMP) – Especificacão Funcional.

  • Choo, E., Schoner, B. and Wedley, W.: 1999, ‘Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision-making’, Computers & Industrial Engineering 37, 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, B. and Burges, S. J.: 1984, ‘Short-term, single, multiple-purpose reservoir operation: importance of loss functions and forecast errors’, Water Resources Research 20(9), 1167–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier, H. and Prade, H.: 1995, ‘Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling’, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 6, 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Fortemps, P.: 1999, ‘Computing improved optimal solutions to max-min flexible constraint satisfaction problems’, European Journal of Operational Research 118, 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esogbue, A. O. and Kacprzyk, J.: 1998, Fuzzy Dynamic Programming, in: Handbook of Fuzzy Sets Series, vol 5: Decision Analysis in Operations Research and Statistics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontane, D. G., Gates, T. K. and Moncada, E.: 1997, ‘Planning reservoir operations with imprecise objectives’, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 123(3), 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth P., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kuchment, L. S. and Rosbjerg, D.: 1998, Critiques of Present Reservoirs, in: Sustainable Reservoir Development and Management (IAHS Publication no. 251, Wallingford, UK).

  • Johnson, S. A., Stedinger, J. R. Shoemaker, C. A. Li, Y. and Tajada-Guibert, J. A.: 1993, ‘Numerical solution of continuous-state dynamic programs using linear and spline interpolation’, Operation. Research. 41(3), 484–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J.: 1997, Multistage Fuzzy Control, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaymak U. and van Nauta Lemke, H. R.: 1998, ‘A sensitivity analysis approach to introducing weight factors into decision functions in fuzzy multicriterion decision-making’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman J., Stedinger, J. R., Cooper, L. A., Hsu, E. and Yuan, S.: 1990, ‘Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation’, Water Resources Research 26(3), 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, D. P.: 2000, ‘Sustainable water resources management’, Water International 25(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklow, J. W.: 2000, ‘Discrete-time optimal control for water resources engineering and management’, Water International 25(1), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M.: 1989, ‘Optimal stochastic operations of large hydroelectric systems’, Electrical Power & Energy Systems 11(3), 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M.: 1998, Application of Economic Theory in Power System Analysis – Competition for Contracts in a Hydrothermal System, VI Symposium of Specialists in Electric Operational and Expansion Planning.

  • Saaty, T. L.: 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabman, L. and Stephenson, K.: 2000, ‘Environmental valuation and its economic critics’, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 126(6), 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedinger, J. R., Sule, B. F. and Loucks, D. P.: 1984, ‘Stochastic dynamic programming models for reservoir operation optimization’, Water Resources Research 20(11), 1499–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teegavarapu, R. S. V. and Simonovic, S. P.: 1999, ‘Modeling uncertainty in reservoir loss functions using fuzzy sets’, Water Resources Research 35(9), 2815–2823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejada-Guibert A., Johnson, S. A. and Stedinger, J. R.: 1993, ‘Comparison of two approaches for implementing multireservoir operating policies derived using stochastic dynamic programming’, Water Resources Research 29(12), 3969–3980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilmant, A., Persoons, E. and Vanclooster, M.: 2001, Deriving Efficient Reservoir Operating Rules Using Flexible Stochastic Dynamic Programming, in: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Water Resources Management, WIT Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.: 1978, ‘Fuzzy decision making including unequal objectives’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, W. W-G.: 1985, ‘Reservoir management and operations models: a state-of-the art review’, Water Resources Research 21(12), 1797–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H.-J.: 1991, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Application (2nd edition), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vanclooster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tilmant, A., Fortemps, P. & Vanclooster, M. Effect of Averaging Operators in Fuzzy Optimization of Reservoir Operation. Water Resources Management 16, 1–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015523901205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015523901205

Navigation