Skip to main content

Stress and Student Job Design: Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Performance in University Students

Abstract

It is imperative that the university environment be supportive and capable of nurturing optimal learning and performance in students. Using job design and work stress theories, the study assessed relationships between psychosocial work characteristics, well-being and satisfaction, and performance in a random sample survey of Australian university students (N = 176). Methodological improvements were a time lag between survey and performance measures, an objective measure of performance, and LISREL structural equation modeling. Results showed high levels of psychological distress and low levels of satisfaction, both linked to high demands combined with low control. In accord with the happy-productive student hypothesis, satisfaction mediated the impact of the work environment on performance. Reengineering the design of the student work environment may therefore improve performance outcomes (student grades) through enhancing satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Abouserie, R. (1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14, 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Archer, J., & Scevak, J. J. (1998). Enhancing student's motivation to learn: Achievement goals in university classrooms. Educational Psychology, 18, 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modelling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cordery, J. (1997). Reinventing work design theory. Australian Psychologist, 22, 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2000). Work, psychological well-being and performance. Occupational Medicine, 50, 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. United States of America. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dollard, M. F., & Winefield, A. H. (1998). A test of the demand-control/support model of work stress in correctional officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dollard, M. F., Winefield, H. R., & Winefield, A. H. (2001). Occupational strain and efficacy in human service workers. The Netherlands, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dollard, M. F., Winefield, H. R., Winefield, A. H., & Jonge, J. de (2000). Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: A test of the Demand-Control-Support Model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felsten, G., & Wilcox, K. (1992). Influences of stress and situation-specific mastery beliefs and satisfaction with social support on well-being and academic performance. Psychological Reports, 70, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, S. (1994). Stress in academic life. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, England: Nfer-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hackman, J. R., & Oldman, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jaccard, J. R., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Judge, T. A., Tharesen, C. J., Bong, J. E., Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karasek, R. A. (1998). Demand/control model: A social emotional and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior development. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 346–414.

  24. Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leonard, C. A. R., Bourke, S., & Schofield, N. J. (1999). Student stress and absenteeism in primary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, November. Published on the Internet at http://www.aare.edu.au/ 99pap/leo99542.htm accessed 5th Mar, 2000.

  26. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385–393.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students' time management: correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760–768.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moos, R. H. (1986). Work Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O'Driscoll, M. P., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Promnitz, J., & Germain, C. (1996). Student support services and academic outcomes: Achieving positive outcomes. Brisbane: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Puccio, G. J., Talbot, R. J., & Joniak, A. J. (1993). Person-environment fit: Using commensurate scales to predict student stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Samdal, O. (1998). The school environment as a risk or resource for students' health-related behaviours and subjective well-being. Ph.D. Dissertation. Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Theorell, T., & Karasek, R. A. (1996). Current issues relating to psychological job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tofi, T., Flett, R., & Timutimu-Thorpe, H. (1996) Problems faced by pacific island students at university in New Zealand: Some effects on academic performance and psychological wellbeing. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 31, 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Warr, P. B. (1990) Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being. Work and Stress, 4, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Warr, P. B., Cook, J. D., & Wall, T. D. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Webster, I. W., Porritt, D. W., & Brennan, P. J. (1983). Reported health, lifestyle and occupational stress in prison officers. Community Health Studies, 7, 266–277.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winefield, H. R. (1993). Study work satisfaction and psychological distress in older university students. Work and Stress, 7, 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Winefield, H. R., Goldney, R. D., Winefield, A. H., & Tiggemann, M. (1989). The General Health Questionnaire: Reliability and validity for Australian youth. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Winefield, H. R., Winefield, A. H., & Tiggemann, M. (1992). Social support and psychological well-being in young adults: The Multi-Dimensional Support Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favourable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotton, S.J., Dollard, M.F. & de Jonge, J. Stress and Student Job Design: Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Performance in University Students. International Journal of Stress Management 9, 147–162 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015515714410

Download citation

  • student stress
  • student well-being
  • academic performance
  • academic achievement and student job design