International Journal of Stress Management

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 147–162 | Cite as

Stress and Student Job Design: Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Performance in University Students

  • Sarah J. Cotton
  • Maureen F. Dollard
  • Jan de Jonge


It is imperative that the university environment be supportive and capable of nurturing optimal learning and performance in students. Using job design and work stress theories, the study assessed relationships between psychosocial work characteristics, well-being and satisfaction, and performance in a random sample survey of Australian university students (N = 176). Methodological improvements were a time lag between survey and performance measures, an objective measure of performance, and LISREL structural equation modeling. Results showed high levels of psychological distress and low levels of satisfaction, both linked to high demands combined with low control. In accord with the happy-productive student hypothesis, satisfaction mediated the impact of the work environment on performance. Reengineering the design of the student work environment may therefore improve performance outcomes (student grades) through enhancing satisfaction.

student stress student well-being academic performance academic achievement and student job design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abouserie, R. (1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14, 323–330.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, J., & Scevak, J. J. (1998). Enhancing student's motivation to learn: Achievement goals in university classrooms. Educational Psychology, 18, 205–223.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.Google Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modelling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.Google Scholar
  8. Cordery, J. (1997). Reinventing work design theory. Australian Psychologist, 22, 185–189.Google Scholar
  9. Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2000). Work, psychological well-being and performance. Occupational Medicine, 50, 304–308.Google Scholar
  10. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. United States of America. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.Google Scholar
  11. Dollard, M. F., & Winefield, A. H. (1998). A test of the demand-control/support model of work stress in correctional officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 1–23.Google Scholar
  12. Dollard, M. F., Winefield, H. R., & Winefield, A. H. (2001). Occupational strain and efficacy in human service workers. The Netherlands, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Dollard, M. F., Winefield, H. R., Winefield, A. H., & Jonge, J. de (2000). Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: A test of the Demand-Control-Support Model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 501–510.Google Scholar
  14. Felsten, G., & Wilcox, K. (1992). Influences of stress and situation-specific mastery beliefs and satisfaction with social support on well-being and academic performance. Psychological Reports, 70, 291–303.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, S. (1994). Stress in academic life. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, England: Nfer-Nelson.Google Scholar
  17. Hackman, J. R., & Oldman, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Jaccard, J. R., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  21. Judge, T. A., Tharesen, C. J., Bong, J. E., Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.Google Scholar
  22. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.Google Scholar
  23. Karasek, R. A. (1998). Demand/control model: A social emotional and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior development. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 346–414.Google Scholar
  24. Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Leonard, C. A. R., Bourke, S., & Schofield, N. J. (1999). Student stress and absenteeism in primary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, November. Published on the Internet at 99pap/leo99542.htm accessed 5th Mar, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385–393.Google Scholar
  27. Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students' time management: correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760–768.Google Scholar
  28. Moos, R. H. (1986). Work Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  29. O'Driscoll, M. P., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 141–155.Google Scholar
  30. Promnitz, J., & Germain, C. (1996). Student support services and academic outcomes: Achieving positive outcomes. Brisbane: Department of Employment, Education and Training.Google Scholar
  31. Puccio, G. J., Talbot, R. J., & Joniak, A. J. (1993). Person-environment fit: Using commensurate scales to predict student stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 457–468.Google Scholar
  32. Samdal, O. (1998). The school environment as a risk or resource for students' health-related behaviours and subjective well-being. Ph.D. Dissertation. Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  33. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Theorell, T., & Karasek, R. A. (1996). Current issues relating to psychological job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 9–26.Google Scholar
  35. Tofi, T., Flett, R., & Timutimu-Thorpe, H. (1996) Problems faced by pacific island students at university in New Zealand: Some effects on academic performance and psychological wellbeing. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 31, 51–59.Google Scholar
  36. Warr, P. B. (1990) Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being. Work and Stress, 4, 285–294.Google Scholar
  37. Warr, P. B., Cook, J. D., & Wall, T. D. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129–148.Google Scholar
  38. Webster, I. W., Porritt, D. W., & Brennan, P. J. (1983). Reported health, lifestyle and occupational stress in prison officers. Community Health Studies, 7, 266–277.Google Scholar
  39. Winefield, H. R. (1993). Study work satisfaction and psychological distress in older university students. Work and Stress, 7, 221–228.Google Scholar
  40. Winefield, H. R., Goldney, R. D., Winefield, A. H., & Tiggemann, M. (1989). The General Health Questionnaire: Reliability and validity for Australian youth. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 53–58.Google Scholar
  41. Winefield, H. R., Winefield, A. H., & Tiggemann, M. (1992). Social support and psychological well-being in young adults: The Multi-Dimensional Support Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 198–210.Google Scholar
  42. Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favourable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20, 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah J. Cotton
    • 1
  • Maureen F. Dollard
    • 2
  • Jan de Jonge
    • 3
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SouthAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Utrecht University, Social and Organizational PsychologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations