Skip to main content
Log in

Teacher Accountability: An Experimental Field Study

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental field study was conducted to examine the impact of accountability on effectiveness in the teaching of physical education. Accountability was constructed through the introduction of a system of reporting and feedback between the teachers and the professional supervisor on two levels of intensity, high and low. Findings show that the institution of the accountability system improved the participant teachers' effectiveness as compared with control group teachers. Improvement in students' achievements was more evident in girls than in boys. The accountability system constructed for this study may be applied not only in physical education but in other educational areas as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annarino, A.A. (1981). Accountability: An Instructional Model for Secondary Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 7, 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbogast, G.W., & Griffin, L. (1989). Accountability: Is it Within Reach of the Profession? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60, 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Sira, D. (1986). Physical Fitness Survey for Grades 10–12 for Determining Data for Fitness Tests. Emmanuel Gil Press, Zinman College of Physical Education at the Wingate Institute (Hebrew).

  • Burstein, L., Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1992). Educational Indicators. In M.C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (pp. 413–418). Macmillan.

  • Cheng, Y.C., & Tsui, K.T. (1997). Multimodels of Teacher Effectiveness: Implications for Research. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1980). Teaching Volleyball. Minneapolis, MN: Kansas State University, Burgess Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Asher, C. (1991). Accountability Mechanisms in Big City School Systems. ERIC/CUE, Digest No. 71.

  • Doyle, W. (1980). Student Mediating Responses in Teaching Effectiveness (final report). Denton: North Texas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1993). Teacher Accountability: Why it is Central to Teacher Professional Development. In L. Kremer-Hayon, H.C. Vonk, & R. Fessler (Eds.), Teacher Professional Development. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frink, D.D., & Ferris, G.R. (1998). Accountability, Impression Management, and Goal Setting in the Performance Evaluation Process. Human Relations, 51(10), 1259–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frink, D.D., & Klimoski, R.J. (1998). Toward a Theory of Accountability in Organizations and Human Resource Management. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (Vol. 16, pp. 1–51). London: JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, L.E. (1984). What Price Accountability? Keynote Address Presented at the Annual Convention of the Kansas Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Manhattan, Kansas.

  • Hastie, P.A. (1993). Players' Perceptions of Accountability Factors in Secondary School Sports Settings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, P.A. (1994). Selected Teacher Behaviors and Student ALT-PE in Secondary School Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 242–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, L.D. (1990). Current Measurement and Evaluation Practices in Professional Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61, 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, L.D., Lambert, L.T., Baumgartner, T.A., & Stillwell, J.L. (1987). Is Evaluation Worth the Effort? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 58, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imwold, C.H., Rider, R.A., & Johnson, D.J. (1982). The Use of Evaluation in Public School Physical Education Programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, P.G., & Meyer, J.P. (1994). Reexamination of the Met-expectations Hypothesis: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 937–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A.W., Morrow, J.R., Hill, D.W., & Dishman, R.K. (1999). Physical Activity for Health and Fitness. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Jones, B.D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The Impact of High-Stakes Testing on Teachers and Students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, Nov., 199–203.

  • Kneer, M. (1986). Description of Physical Education Instruction Theory: Practice Gap in Selected Secondary Schools. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C., & Lawton, D. (1981). Issues in Evaluation and Accountability. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessinger, L.M. (1972). Accountability for Results: A Basic Challenge for America's Schools. In L.M. Lessinger & R.W. Tyler (Eds.), Accountability in Education. Washington, DC: Charles A. Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. (1992). Assessment and Accountability in Secondary Physical Education. Quest, 44, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, R.J.S. (1996). Educative Accountability Policy Research: Methodology and Epistemology. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 80–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggard, N.J. (1984). Upgrading Our image. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 55, 17–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matanin, M., & Tannehill, D. (1994). Assessment and Grading in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, M., Siedentop, D., & Tannchill, D. (1994). Breaking Out: Codependency of High School Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, W.L. (1994). Removing the “Super” from Supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9, 284–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, H. (1990). Physical Activity and Public Health: Prevention, Promotion, and Rehabilitation. Emmanuel Gil Press, Zinman College of Physical Education at the Wingate Institute (Hebrew).

  • Rosenblatt, Z., & Inbal, B. (1999). Skill Flexibility among Schoolteachers: Operationalization and Organizational Implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Z., & Ruvio, A. (1996). A Test of Multidimensional Model of Job Insecurity: The Case of Israeli Teachers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 587–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers' Workplace. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvio, A., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1999). Job Insecurity among Israeli Schoolteachers: Sectoral Profiles and Organizational Implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S., Kulinna, P.H., & Crull, G. (1995). Skill-related Task Structures, Explicitness, and Accountability: Relationships with Student Achievement. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sockett, H. (Ed.) (1980). Accountability in the English Educational System. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E. (1992). The Impact of Accountability on Judgement and Choice: Toward a Social Contingency Model. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331–337). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and Cognitive Strategies for Coping with Accountability: Conformity, Complexity, and Bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tymms, P. (1993). Accountability—Can it be Fair? Oxford Review of Education, 19(3), 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, M.L. (1988). Pupil Assessment Issues: A Teacher Educator's Perspective. Quest, 40, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, M.L. (1992). School-based Theories of Pupil Assessment: A Case Study. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 63, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (1989). Accountability in Education: A Philosophical Inquiry. Routledge: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigold, M.F., & Schlenker, B.R. (1991). Accountability and Risk Taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenblatt, Z., Shimoni, O. Teacher Accountability: An Experimental Field Study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15, 309–328 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015457732452

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015457732452

Keywords

Navigation