Skip to main content
Log in

Fundamentalism and Paranoia in Groups and Society

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

This paper will examine the concepts of fundamentalism and paranoia to contribute understanding to how extremist positions have developed. Fundamentalism is a rigid, dogmatic, and skewed view that dismisses other competing and conflicting viewpoints. Extreme feelings can only lead to extremist behavior. Fears in our inner selves will only fuel the fires of paranoia, encourage fundamentalist behavior, and lead to group conflicts. We will examine this on micro (group) and macro (society) levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yehuda, N. (1993). Political assassinations by Jews. New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W.R. (1955). Group dynamics: A re-view. In: M. Klein, P. Heimann & R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psycho-analysis. London: Maresfield, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, M. (1999). Soros: Beware market fundamentalism. Dollars & Sense, January/February, 221:8.

  • Eysenck, M. (1997). Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard Edition, volume 18. London: Hogarth Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1956). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (1997). Fundamentalism, gender and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19: 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (1987). Us and them: The psychology of ethnonationalism. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1955). Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In: M. Klein, P. Heimann & R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psycho-analysis. London: Maresfield, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, J.S. (1971). Ambiguity for individuation: A critique and reformulation of double-bind theory. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25:232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpin, M. & Friedman, I. (1998). Murder in the name of God. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, W. (1970). Impollutable Pogo. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1998). Ideology, conflict, and leadership in groups and organizations. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1996). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In: J. F. Clarkin & M. F. Lenzenweger (eds.), Major theories of personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1946). The concept of dread. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1948). On the theory of anxiety and guilt. In: M. Klein, P. Heimann, S. Isaacs & J. Riviere, (Eds.), Developments in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Envy and gratitude. New York: Delta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystal, H. (1988). Integration and self-healing. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. (1979). Freud and the problem of God. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D. (1993). Piety and power: The world of Jewish fundamentalism. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd. London: Ernest Benn, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1998). Religion and assassination in the Middle East. In: C. Liebman (Ed.), Political assassination: The murder of Rabin and political assassinations in the Middle East. Tel Aviv: Am Oved (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M. (1991). On Basic Unity (Letter to the Editor). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 72:364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitzky, A. (1986). The roots of Kahanism: Consciousness and political reality. Jerusalem: Shazar Library, Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. (1945). Character analysis. New York: Touchstone, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reik, T. (1951). Dogma and compulsion. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, R.W. & Kelly, R. J. (1991). Substance and shadow: Images of the enemy. In: R.W. Rieber (Ed.), The psychology of war and peace. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. S. & Post, J.M. (1997). Political paranoia: The psychopolitics of hatred. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, L.A. (1992). Madness and modernism. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (1998). Peace and paranoia. In: J. H. Berke, S. Pierides, A. Sabbadini & S. Schneider (Eds.), Even paranoids have enemies: New perspectives on paranoia and persecution. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (1993). Group-analytic psychotherapy under threat of war: The Gulf Crisis.” Group Analysis, 26:99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (1987). Psychotherapy and social work training: Individual differences. Jewish Social Work Forum, 23: 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenewolf, G. (1991). The art of hating. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, J.B. (1965). The lonely man of faith. Tradition, 7:5–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, J.B. (1992). Divrei Hashkafa. Jerusalem: World Zionist Congress (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttie, I.D. (1960). The origins of love and hate. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkan, V. (1988). The need to have enemies and allies. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, L. C. (1965). Some indications and contraindications for exploratory family therapy. In: I. Boszormenyi-Nagy & J. L. Framo (Eds.), Intensive family therapy: theoretical and practical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilboorg, G. (1959). Freud and religion. Westminster, Maryland: Newman Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanley Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, S. Fundamentalism and Paranoia in Groups and Society. Group 26, 17–27 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015418511064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015418511064

Navigation