Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 565–571 | Cite as

Flextime Commuters and Their Driver Stress, Feelings of Time Urgency, and Commute Satisfaction

  • Jennifer L. Lucas
  • Ronald B. Heady


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a flextime-working environment on driver stress, feelings of time urgency, and commute satisfaction for commuters in a large-city environment. It was hypothesized that, regardless of gender, commuters with flextime would have less driver stress, fewer feelings of time urgency, and more commute satisfaction. The study was conducted using one hundred and twenty-five full-time employed commuters from Atlanta, Georgia, the city with the largest average commute distance in the world. Results showed that the commuters with flextime reported less driver stress and fewer feelings of time urgency than those without flextime. Significant differences were not found for commute satisfaction. Gender did not appear to be a significant factor in determining driver stress, time urgency, or commute satisfaction.

flextime commuters driver stress time urgency commute satisfaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., & Davies, D. R. (1989). Dimensions of driver stress. Ergonomics, 32, 585–602.Google Scholar
  2. Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. (1990). The stress of driving: A diary study. Work and Stress, 4, 7–16.Google Scholar
  3. Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1997). The relationship between traffic congestion, driver stress, and direct versus indirect coping behaviors. Ergonomics, 40, 348–361.Google Scholar
  4. Kluger, A. N. (1998). Commute variability and strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 147–165.Google Scholar
  5. Koslowsky, M. (1997). Commuting stress: Problems of definition and variable identification. Applied Psychology, 46, 153–173.Google Scholar
  6. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A. N., & Reich, M. (1995). Commuting stress: Causes, effects, and methods of coping. New York: Plenium.Google Scholar
  7. Koslowsky, M., & Krausz, M. (1993). On the relationship between commuting, stress symptoms, and attitudinal measures: A LISREL application. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 485–493.Google Scholar
  8. Meltzer, M. (1997, October 17). Atlanta leads in per capita income growth, commuting. Atlanta Business Chronicle, p. 5A.Google Scholar
  9. Novaco, R. W., Stokols, D., & Milanesi, L. (1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 231–257.Google Scholar
  10. Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1982). Employee responses to flexible work schedules: An inter-organization, inter-system comparison. Journal of Management, 8, 9–25.Google Scholar
  11. Pierce, J. L., Newstrom, J. W., Dunham, R. B., & Barber, A. E. (1989). Alternative work schedules. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Wiechman, L. (1998, October 12). Atlanta's gridlock hurting city's reputation and environment. Marketing News, p. 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Lucas
    • 1
  • Ronald B. Heady
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAgnes Scott CollegeDecatur
  2. 2.University of Louisiana at LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations