Abstract
The effort to write a history of the sociology of religion requires a delineation of the field. In turn, this requires a discrimination among the key ideas determining that field, including the notions of “religion,” “sociology,” the “sacred,” and a host of others. This is a prerequisite for sorting the various contributors and contributions to this field as well as determining the value of any such history to the future advance of the study of human consciousness and conduct, including “religion.” Cipriani's book is reviewed, and its strengths and weaknesses assayed, in light of these concerns. Several lacunae in the book are identified, such as the absence of any treatment of non-Western writers and its failure to substantially engage the work of women, including Jane Ellen Harrison's pioneering sociology of religion.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bellah, Robert N. 1970. “Christianity and Symbolic Realism,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9, 2: 89-99
Cipriani, Roberto. 2000. Sociology of Religion. An Historical Introduction. Translated by Laura Ferrarotti (New York: Aldine de Gruyter)
Davide, Maxime. 1912. “Review of Jane Ellen Harrison, Themis” L' Annee Sociologique, Vol. 12, 1909-1912, 254-260.
Durkheim, Emile. 1995 (1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Translated by Karen Fields (New York: Free Press)
Fenn, Richard K. (Ed.) 2001. Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell)
Hamilton, Malcolm. 1995. The Sociology of Religon: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (New York: Routledge)
Harrison, Jane Ellen. 1903 Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Harrison, Jane Ellen. 1912. Themis: The Social Origins of Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Harrison, Jane Ellen. 1913. Ancient Art and Ritual (New York: Henry Holt)
Harrison, Jane Ellen. 1915. “Review of Emile Durkheim, The ElementaryForms of the Religious Life, Tr. J.W. Swain,” The New Statesman, Vol. 3, October 23, 1915, pp. 62-64.
Harrison, Jane Ellen. 1921 (1962). “Epilegomena to the Study of Greek Religion,” in Epilegomena to the Study of Greek Religion and Themis, Preface by John Wilson (New Hyde Park, New York: University Books)
Nielsen, Donald A. 1987. “Auguste Sabatier and the Durkheimians on the Scientific Study of Religion,” Sociological Analysis, 47, 4: 283-301.
Nielsen, Donald A. 1996a. “Religion and Sociocultural Change in Ancient Greece:TheTheories of Jane Ellen Harrison,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Sociology of Religion, New York, N.Y., August 17, 1996.
Nielsen, Donald A. 1996b. “The Question of Max Weber Today,” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 10, No. 2, Winter, pp. 375-390.
Nielsen, Donald A. 1999. Three Faces of God: Society, Religion and the Categories of Totality in the Philosophy of Emile Durkheim (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1999)
Nielsen, Donald A. 2001a. “Transformations of Society and the Sacred in Durkheim's Religious Sociology,” pp. 120-133 in Richard Fenn (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion (Boston: Blackwell Publishers)
Nielsen, Donald A. 2001b. “Rationalization, Transformations of Consciousness and InterCivilizational Encounters: Reflections on Benjamin Nelson's Sociology of Civilizations,” International Sociology, 16, 3: 406-420.
Pals, Daniel L. 1996. Seven Theories of Religion. (New York: Oxford University Press)
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1964. The Meaning and End of Religion (New York: New American Library)
Stewart, Jessie. 1959. Jane Ellen Harrison: A Portrait From Letters (London: Merlin Press)
Stocking, George W., Jr. (Ed.). 1984. Functionalism Historicised: Essays on British Social Anthropology, History of Anthropology, Vol. 2 (Madison: University ofWisconsin Press)
Swatos, William H., Jr. (Ed.). 1998. Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press)
Tolstoy, Leo. 1996. What Is Art?, Tr. R. Pevear and L.Volokhonsky (NewYork: Penguin Books)
Wach, Joachim. 1944. The Sociology of Religion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
Weber, Max. 1920 (1972). Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Religionssoziologie. 6. Auflage. 3 Vols. (Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck)
Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China, Tr. H.H. Gerth (New York: Free Press)
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, 3 Volumes, Ed. By G. Roth and C. Wittich (New York: Bedminster Press)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1965. The Blue and the Brown Books, Preface by Rush Rhees (New York: Harper Torchbooks)
Woodhead, Linda. 2001. “Feminism and the Sociology of Religion: From Gender-blindness to Gendered Difference,” pp. 67-85 in Richard Fenn (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion (Boston: Blackwell Publishers)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nielsen, D.A. How Is a History of the Sociology of Religion Possible?: Reflections on Roberto Cipriani's Sociology of Religion . International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 15, 613–623 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015376105033
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015376105033