Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation of the Empat as a Measure of Victim Empathy with Civilly Committed Sexual Offenders

  • Published:
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment

Abstract

Enhancement of victim empathy is a common component in the treatment of sexual offenders. However, consensus about the definition of empathy and the best instrument to measure empathy in sexual offenders is lacking. This paper evaluates the Empat as a measure of empathy with patients civilly committed under California's Sexually Violent Predator law. Rapists and child molesters in the current sample scored significantly higher in victim empathy than any of the original sex offender groups, with rapists scoring higher than the control group cited by M. McGrath, S. Cann, and R. Konopasky (1998). Clinicians have found the Empat to be too face valid and easily manipulated by patients within this population. The construct of empathy as applied to sex offenders is reviewed and the properties of a more adequate measure of this construct are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abel, G. G., & Rouleau, J. L. (1990). The nature and extent of sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 9-21). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, G., Becker, J., Mittleman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J., & Murphy, W. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren, D. (1998). Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the “sexual predator” commitment laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 97-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, R. (1948). A preliminary investigation of the relation of insight and empathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 228-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: Ameta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Cox, B., & Woszczyna, C. (1991). Assessing treatment outcome for sexual offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 177-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective-taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminals, and nonoffenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, M. T. (1999). A survey of the nation's sexual predator treatment programs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver.

  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, T., & Ward, T. (2000). A theory of mind perspective on cognitive, affective, and intimacy deficits in child sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 49-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopp, F. H., Freeman-Longo, R., & Stevenson, W. F. (1992). Nationwide survey of juvenile and adult sex-offender treatment program and models. Orwell, VT: The Safer Society Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D. N., McDonel, E. C., & McFall, R. M. (1987). Heterosocial perception in rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 17-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W., Hudson, S., Jones, R., & Fernandez, Y. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 99-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 25-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithers, W. (1994). Process evaluation of a group therapy component designed to enhance sex offenders' empathy for sexual abuse survivors. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 565-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithers, W. (1999). Empathy; definition, enhancement, and relevance to the treatment of sexual abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 257-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentky, R., Lee, A., Knight, R., & Cerce, D. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 635-659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M., Harris, G., & Quinsey, V. (1990). A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum-security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennessy, M., Walter, J.S. & Vess, J. An Evaluation of the Empat as a Measure of Victim Empathy with Civilly Committed Sexual Offenders. Sex Abuse 14, 237–247 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015370425233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015370425233

Navigation