Abstract
Social Work is under attack, not the least of which comes from within its own ranks. Clinical social work appears to the hardest hit as critics question its fit with social work's historic focus on the poor and the oppressed. In addition, there continues to be ongoing controversy regarding the profession as means of social control. Clinical social work has also been attacked for its reliance on the medical model and the growth in private practice. Do these attacks and criticisms signal the end of clinical social work? Or, could this be viewed as part of a process through which social work analyzes its self in its continuing efforts to remain relevant. Is this the evolutionary path of social work? This paper explores some of these controversies and debates. The profession has grown, evolved, and responded to criticism since its inception. A current model for understanding the fit between clinical social work and social justice is presented as an example of how debate continues to lead the profession forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512–526.
Black, W.G. (1991). Social work in World War I: A method lost. Social Service Review, 65(3), 379–401.
Dore, M.M. (1999). The retail method of social work: The role of the New York school in the development of clinical practice. Social Service Review, 73(2), 169–190.
Fisher, J. (1978). Effective casework practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Frank, M.G. (1979). Clinical social work: past, present, and future challenges and dilemmas. In P.L. Ewalt (Ed.), NASW conference proceedings; Toward a definition of clinical social work (pp. 13–22). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
Germain, C. (1969). Casework and Science: A historical encounter. In R. Robertson& R. Nee (Ed.), Theories of social casework (pp. 3–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldstein, E.G. (1996). What is clinical social work? Looking back to move ahead. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 89–104.
Haynes, K. (1998). The one hundred year debate: Social reform versus individual treatment. Social Work, 43(6), 501–512.
Hiersteiner, C. & Peterson, K. (1999). “Crafting a usable past”: The care-centered practice narrative in social work. Affila, 14(2), 144–161.
Hollis, F. (1969). The psychosocial approach to the practice of casework. In R.W. Roberts& R.H. Nee (Ed.), Theories of Social Casework (pp. 33–76). Washington, DC: University of Chicago Press.
Margolin, L. (1997). Under the cover of kindness: The invention of social work. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Reisch, M. (1998, June). The sociopolitical context and social work method, 1890–1950. Social Service Review, 72(2), 163–181.
Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. In L. Leighninger (Ed.) (2000), Creating a new profession; The beginnings of social work education in the United States (pp. 66–85). Alexandria, A: Council on Social Work Education.
Sachs, J. & Newdom, F. (1999). Clinical work and social action: An integrative approach. New York: Haworth Press.
Shoemaker, L. (1998, June). Early conflicts in social work education. Social Service Review, 72(2), 182–191.
Smalley, R. (1969). The functional approach to casework. In R. Roberts& R. Nee (Ed.), Theories of social casework (pp. 77–128). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Specht, H.,& Courtney, M. (1994). Unfaithful angels; How social work has abandoned its mission. New York: The Free Press.
Swenson, C. (1998, November). Clinical social work's contribution to a social justice perspective. Social Work, 43(6), 527–537.
Szasz, T. (1967). The myth of mental illness. In T.J. Scheff (Ed.), Mental illness and social processes (pp. 242–253). New York: Harper & Row.
Wakefield, J.C. (1988, June). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work part 1: Distributive justice as a conceptual framework for social work. Social Service Review, 62(2), 187–211.
Wakefield, J.C. (1988, September). Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work part 2: Psychotherapy and the pursuit of justice. Social Service Review, 62(3), 353–382.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLaughlin, A.M. Social Work's Legacy: Irreconcilable Differences?. Clinical Social Work Journal 30, 187–198 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015297529215
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015297529215