Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro multiplication of Quercus leucotrichophora and Q. glauca: Important Himalayan oaks

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple shoots of Quercus leucotrichophora L. and Q. glauca Thunb. were induced from the intact embryos (decoated seeds) as well as from the cotyledonary nodes (with attached cotyledons but without radicle and primary shoot) of 3-weeks old in vitro grown seedlings on Woody Plant (WP; Lloyd and McCown, 1980) and Murashige and Skoog (MS; 1962) media supplemented with 6-benzyladenine (BA), either alone or in combination with gibberellic acid (GA3)/ indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). BA (22.19 μM) was effective for induction of multiple shoots and addition of GA3 to the medium further enhanced the shoot number and shoot height but resulted in shoot thinness. High frequency shoot multiplication was achieved using cotyledonary nodes. Shoots were further multiplied from the original explant on WP medium supplemented with BA (22.19 μM). Nearly 78% and 67% rooting was obtained in Q. leucotrichophora and Q. glauca microshoots (3–4 cm high), respectively on 1/2 strength WP medium supplemented with IBA (14.76 μM). However, this was associated with basal callus formation. Treatment with IBA (25–100 μM) for 24 or 48 h followed by transfer to PGR free 1/2 strength WP medium not only improved the rooting percentage but also avoided basal callus formation. IBA at 100 μM for 24 h was most effective (90% and 100% rooting in Q. leucotrichophora and Q. glauca, respectively). In vitro rooted plants were hardened and established in garden soil.

Growth performance of 6-month-old in vitro raised plants was compared with ex vitro plants (seedlings) of the same age. The photosynthesis and transpiration rates of eight months old in vitro and ex vitro raised plants of both species were measured under different light (0, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 2000 μmol m−2s−1) and temperature (20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 °C). Light optimum for photosynthesis was around 2000 μmol m−2s−1 in Q. leucotrichophora and around 1500 μmol m−2s−1 in Q. glauca whereas optimum temperature for photosynthesis was 25 °C in Q. leucotrichophora and 30 °C in Q. glauca. The rate of transpiration at different temperatures (20–40 °C), in the two species, increased with increase in the light intensity up to the highest level, i.e., 2000 μmol m−2s−1. Temperatures beyond 35 °C adversely affected the rate of transpiration in in vitro raised as well as ex vitro plants of both the species. In vitro raised and hardened plants of both the species were comparable to ex vitro plants in terms of gas and water vapour exchange characteristics, within the limits of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bag N, Chandra S, Palni LMS & Nandi SK (2000) Micropropagation of Devringal (Thamnocalamus spathiflorus)-a temperate bamboo, and comparison of in vitro propagated plants and seedlings. Plant Sci. 156: 125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellarosa R (1989) Oak (Quercus spp.) In: Bajaj YPS (eds) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol 5 Trees II (pp 387–401). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet LK & Davies FT (1986) In vitro propagation of Quercus shumardii seedlings. Hort. Sci. 21(4): 1045–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj DR, Mishra VK & Shamet GS (1996) Rooting response of Quercus leucotrichophora Linn. cuttings to chemical treatments and physio-chemical status. J. Tree Sci. 15(1): 49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisht MS, Vyas P, Bag N & Palni LMS (1998) Micropropagation of some plants of Indian Himalayan region. In: Plant Tissue Culture and Molecular Biology - Applications and Prospects (pp 126–170). Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan PH, Kim YJ, Hyndman SE, Hasegawa PM & Bressan RA (1982) Factors affecting in vitro propagation of rose. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107: 979–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalupa V (1984) In vitro propagation of oak (Quercus robur L.) and linden (Tilia cordata Mill.). Biol. Plant. 26: 374–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalupa V (1988) Large scale micropropagation of Quercus robur L. using adenine-type cytokinins and thidiazuron to stimulate shoot prolification. Biol. Plant. 30(6): 414–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalupa V (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in oak (Quercus spp.). In: Jain S, Gupta P & Newton R (eds) Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants. Vol 2 (pp 67–87). Angiosperms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion HG & Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India Publications, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S & Dhyani PP (1997) Diurnal and monthly variation in leaf temperature, water vapour transfer and energy exchange in the leaves of Ficus glomerata during summer. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 3: 135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Favre JM & Juncker B (1987) In vitro growth of buds taken from seedlings and adult plant material in Quercus robur L. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 8: 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates DM (1975) Introduction to biophysical ecology. In: Gates DM & Schmerl RB (eds) Perspectives of Biophysical Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JF (1984) Factors affecting shoot proliferation and root initiation in organ cultures of apple ‘Northern Spy’. Scientia Hortic. 22: 347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide Y & Yamamoto S (1987) In vitro plantlet regeneration from axillary buds of juvenile seedllings of konara (Quercus serrata). J. Jap. For. Soc. 69: 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG, Monteith JL, Shuttlerworth WJ & Unsworth NH (1988) Forest, Weather and Climate. The Royal Society Publ., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Letham DS & Palni LMS (1983) The biosynthesis and metabolism of cytokinins. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 34: 163–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd G & McCown (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanera JA & Pardos JA (1990) Micropropagation of juvenile and adult Quercus suber L. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 21: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi SK, Palni LMS, Letham DS & Wong OC (1989) Identification of cytokinins in primary crown gall tumours of tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 12: 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardos JA (1981) In vitro plant formation from stem pieces of Q. suber. In: AFOCEL (ed) Coll Int Culture in vitro des essences forestieres, (pp 186–190). IUFRO, Fontainebleau, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Perinet P & Lalonde K (1983) In vitro propagation and nodulation of actinorhizal host plant, Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Plant Sci. Lett. 29: 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • San-Josh MC, Ballester A & Vieitez AM (1988) Factors affecting in vitro propagation of Quercus robur L. Tree Physiol. 4: 281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • San-Jose MC, Vieitez AM & Ballester A (1990) Clonal propagation of juvenile and adult trees of sessile oak by tissue culture techniques. Silvac. Gen. 39: 50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Mori N & Saito A (1987) In vitro plantlet propagation from epicotyl segments of young seedlings of kunugi (Quercus acutissima). J. Jap. For. Soc. 69: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz OJ & Schlarbaum SE (1993) Axillary bud proliferation of 2 North American oak species: Quercus alba and Quercus rubra. Ann. Sci. For. (50 Suppl) 1: 340s–343s

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutjesdijk PH & Barkman JJ (1992) Microclimate, vegetation and fauna. Opulus Press Publ., Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamta S, Purohit VK, Nandi SK & Palni LMS (2000) Chemical induction of root formation in Quercus leucotrichophora L. Stem cuttings. Ind. J. For. 23(2): 135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Troup RS (1921) The Silviculture of Indian trees. Vol 1-3 (pp 1195). Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieitez AM, San-Jose MC & Vieitez E (1985) In vitro plantlet regeneration from juvenile and mature Q. robur.J.Hortic.Sci.60(1): 99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieitez AM, Sanchez MC, Juan B, Amo-Marco & Ballester A (1994) Forced flushing of branch segments as a method for obtaining reactive explants of mature Quercus robur trees for micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 37: 287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm E (2000) Somatic embryogenesis in oak (Quercus spp.) In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 36(5): 349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1986) SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Eranston, 1L: Systat

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv M (1995) In vitro acclimatization. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T & Smith ML (eds) Automation and Environmental Control in Plant Tissue Culture (pp 493–516). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lok Man S. Palni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Purohit, V.K., Tamta, S., Chandra, S. et al. In vitro multiplication of Quercus leucotrichophora and Q. glauca: Important Himalayan oaks. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 69, 121–133 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015296713243

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015296713243

Navigation