Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological land evaluation for nature redevelopment in river areas

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape enhancement projects are under way at the Yamanakadani and Kadowaki rivers, which run through the campus of Hiroshima University, Japan. At both sites, the ecological value of land was determined from two aspects: (1) value as vegetation and (2) value to birds. To evaluate the vegetation, we selected conservation sites and suitable sites for enhancement considering rarity and recovery potential of vegetation, and access to users and construction equipment. We determined that the area of forest, the number of forest vertical layers, and forest pattern help sustain avian diversity and contribute toward the area functioning as an avian corridor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askin R.A., Philbrick M.J. and Sugeno D.S. Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 39: 129-152.

  • Dmowski K. and Kozakiewicz M. 1990. Influence of shrub corridor on movements of passerine birds to a lake littoral zone. Landscape Ecol. 4: 99-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdelen M. 1984. Bird communities and vegetation structure. 1. Correlations and comparisons of simple and diversity indices. Oecologia 61: 277-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. 1983. Corridors in a landscape: Their ecological structure and function. Ekologia (CSSR) 2: 375-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T., 1995. Land Mosaic. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. and Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K.E. and Merriam H.G. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragment. Biol. Conserv. 36: 115-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates J.E. and Mosher J.A. 1981. A functional approach to estimating habitat edge width for birds. Am. Midland Nat. 105: 189-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. 1997. Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms W.B. and Opdam P. 1990. Woods as habitat patches for birds: Application in landscape planning in the Netherlands. In: Zonnevelt I.S. and Forman R.T.T. (eds.), Changing Landscape. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, pp. 73-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe R.W. 1984. Local dynamics of bird assemblages in Australia and North America. Ecology 65(5): 1585-1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson W.E. 1991. Landscape linkages and biodiversity. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide H., Kameyama A., Takeuchi K., Inoue K. and Munehisa I., 1976 Phytosociological study on the roadside vegetation. Appl. Phytosoc. 4: 26-44 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Josef B. 1993. Grundlagen des Biotopschutzes fur Tiere (4. Auflage). Bundesamt fur Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama A. 1973. Phytosociological studies for rural land use planning. 1. Appl. Phytosoc 2: 1-22 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama A., Ide H., Ito N., Katuno T. and Inoue K. 1975. Phytosociological discussion on programme of road construction. Appl. Phytosoc 4: 1-225 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T., Nakagoshi N. Tanimoto S., 1999. Landscape-ecological evaluation of biotope planning in the riparian area of Hiroshima University. J. Jpn. Instit. Landscape Architect. 62: 603-606 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma R.L., 1984. Effect of edge on breeding forest bird species. Wilson Bull 96: 426-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramoto N., Hioki Y., Kameyama A., Yabu S., Katuno T., Haruta A. and Inoue I. 1995. Conservation biology and biotope planning (1). J. Jpn. Instit. Landscape Architect. 58: 408-414 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and MacArthur J.W., 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machtans C., Villard M. and Hannon S. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1366-1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanson G.P., 1993. Riparian Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy E.M., 1995. Effects of forest patch size on avian diversity. Landscape Ecol. 10: 85-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z. and Lieberman A.S. 1984. Landscape Ecology. Theory Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura K. and Nakagoshi N. 1999. Quantification of spatial structures in two landscape regions. J. Environ. Sci. 11: 188-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservation Bureau and Asia Air Survey 1994. Report of the Fourth National Vegetation Survey. The Environment Agency, Tokyo (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp D. and Opdam P. 1987. Effect of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecol. 1: 59-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld I.S. 1995. Land Ecology. An Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Base for Land Evaluation, Land Management and Conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakagoshi, N., Kondo, T. Ecological land evaluation for nature redevelopment in river areas. Landscape Ecology 17 (Suppl 1), 83–93 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015285828041

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015285828041

Navigation