Skip to main content
Log in

Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to the distinction between species as a category and speciesas a taxon, the word “species” is ambiguous in a very different butequally important way, namely the temporal distinction between horizontal andvertical species. Although often found in the relevant literature, thisdistinction has thus far remained vague and undefined. In this paper the use ofthe distinction is explored, an attempt is made to clarify and define it, andthen the relation between the two dimensions and the implications of thatrelation are examined. Using Darwin's analogy of language evolution forspeciesevolution, and by appealing to a major change in the conception of languagebetween 19th- and 20th-century linguistics, it is argued that the horizontaldimension has priority (pragmatic, epistemological, logical, and ontological)over the vertical dimension. This has immense ramifications for the modernspecies problem. Fundamentally, it favors horizontal species concepts oververtical ones. In so doing it places species realism on a much more securefoundation and largely undercuts species pluralism. In addition it raises aserious problem for the increasingly popular family of phylogenetic speciesconcepts, which generally suffer from a dimensionality confusion. However,thereis a recent trend within this family that attempts to restore the priority ofthe horizontal dimension. It is concluded that this trend should be affirmedandthat the species-as-individuals view should be abandoned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter S.G. 1999. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton P.A. and Abbott R.J. 1992. Multiple Origins and Genetic Diversity in the Newly Arisen Allopolyploid Species, Senecio Cambrensis Rosser (Compositae). Heredity 68: 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum D.A. and Shaw K.L. 1995. Genealogical Perspectives on the Species Problem. In: Hoch P.C. and Stephenson A.G. (eds), Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, pp. 289-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton D. 1990. Language & Species. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock W.J. 1979. The Synthetic Explanation of Macroevolutionary Change-A Reductionistic Approach. In: Shwartz J.H. and Rollins H.B. (eds), Models and Methodologies in Evolutionary Theory. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Number 13, Pittsburgh, pp. 20-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock W.J. 1994. Ernst Mayr, Naturalist: His Contributions to Systematics and Evolution. Biology & Philosophy 9: 267-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd A.F. and Mishler B.D. 1990. Species and Evolution in Clonal Organisms-Summary and Discussion. Systematic Botany 15: 166-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. 1987. Language in a Psychological Setting. Sophia University, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. 1991. Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A Personal View. In: Kasher A. (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. 1997. Language from an Internalist Perspective. In: Johnson D.M. and Erneling C.E. (eds), The Future of the Cognitive Revolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 118-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copi I.M. and Cohen C. 1998. Introduction to Logic. 10th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J. 1983. Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis. Current Ornithology 1: 159-187. Reprinted in Ereshefsky 1992a: 93-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J. 1987. Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution. Biology & Philosophy 2: 329-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J. 1989. Species as Entities of Biological Theory. In: Ruse M. (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 31-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J. 1997. Species Concepts in Systematics and Conservation Biology-an Ornithological Viewpoint. In: Claridge M.F. (ed.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 325-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A. 1978. Once Again, What Is a Species? Biosystematics in Agriculture: Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research 2: 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. 1871. The Descent of Man, Volume 1. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A.M. 1987. 'Organic' and 'Organism' in Franz Bopp. In: Hoenigswal and Wiener (eds), Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective., pp. 81-107.

  • Dawkins R. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall D.S. (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 403-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D.C. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz K. 1999. The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category. In: Wilson R.A. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 49-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSalle R. and Lindley D. 1997. The Science of Jurassic Park and The Lost World, or, How to Build a Dinosaur. BasicBooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. 1985a. Time Frames. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. 1985b. Unfinished Synthesis. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. 1989. Macroevolutionary Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. 1995. Species, Selection, and Paterson's Concept of the Specific-Mate Recognition System. In: Lambert D.M. and Spencer H.G. (eds), Speciation and the Recognition Concept. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 464-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. and Cracraft J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. and Gould S.J. 1972. Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In: Schopf T.J.M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co., San Francisco, 82-115. Reprinted in Eldredge 1985a: 193-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler J.A. 1989. Conceptual and Other Problems in Speciation. In: Otte and Endler (eds), Speciation and Its Consequences., pp. 625-648.

  • Ereshefsky M. (ed.) 1992a. The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M. 1992b. Eliminative Pluralism. Philosophy of Science 59: 671-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin D.H. and Anstey R.L. 1995. New Approaches to Speciation in the Fossil Record. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Thomas Y. Crowell Co., Inc., New York, Reprinted (1980). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox A. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost D.R. and Wright J.W. 1988. The Taxonomy of Uniparental Species, with Special Reference to Parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae). Syst. Zool. 37: 200-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1966. On Psychologism in the Logic of Taxonomic Controversies. Syst. Zool. 15: 207-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1974. A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Syst. Zool. 23: 536-544. Reprinted in Ereshefsky 1992a: 279-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1981. Taxa, Life, and Thinking. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 303-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1987a. Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity. Biology & Philosophy 2: 127-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1987b. Response to Commentary on the Individuality of Species. Biology & Philosophy 2: 207-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M.T. 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings L.V., Kaneshiro K.Y. and Anderson W.W. (eds) 1989. Genetics, Speciation, and the Founder Principle. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. and Lewontin R.C. 1978. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 205: 581-598. Reprinted in Elliott Sober, ed. (1994). Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 73-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P.E. 1994. Cladistic Classification and Functional Explanation. Phil. of Sci. 61: 206-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl D.L. 1988. A Primer of Population Genetics. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, D. Dwight Davis and Rainer Zangerl, trans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenigswald H.M. and Wiener L.F. (eds) 1987. Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard D.J. and Berlocher S.H. (eds) 1998. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck G.J. and Goldsmith J.A. 1995. Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D.L. 1978. A Matter of Individuality. Phil. of Sci. 45: 335-360. Reprinted in Ereshefsky 1992a: 293-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D.L. 1987. Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles. Biology & Philosophy 2: 168-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D.L. 1988. Science as a Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. 1984. Species. Phil. of Sci. 51: 308-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge A.G. 1990. Species as Historical Individuals. Biol. Phil. 5: 417-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laponce J.A. 1987. Languages and Their Territories. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte L.F. 1994. Simpson on Species. J. Hist. Biol. 27: 141-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D.A. 1979. The Nature of Plant Species. Science 204: 381-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln R., Boxshall G. and Clark P. 1998. A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losos J.B. 1996. Phylogenies and Comparative Biology, Stage II: Testing Causal Hypotheses Derived from Phylogenies with Data from Extant Taxa. Syst. Biol. 45: 259-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckow M. 1995. Species Concepts: Assumptions, Methods, and Applications. Syst. Bot. 20: 589-605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyell C. 1832. Principles of Geology, Volume II. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann D.G. 1999. The Species Concept in Diatoms. Phycologia 38: 437-495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis L. 1991. Symbiogenesis and Symbionticism. In: Margulis L. and Fester R. (eds), Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1949. The Species Concept: Semantics Versus Semantics. Evolution 3: 371-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1987a. The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology. Biology & Philosophy 2: 145-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1987b. Answers to These Comments. Biology & Philosophy 2: 212-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur T. 1998. The English Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade L.A. 1995. Species Concepts and Problems in Practice: Insights from Botanical Monographs. Systematic Botany 20: 606-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler B.D. and Brandon R.N. 1987. Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept. Biology & Philosophy 2: 397-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler B.D. and Donoghue M.J. 1982. Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism. Syst. Zool. 31:491-503. Reprinted in Ereshefsky 1992a: 121-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols J. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte D. and Endler J.A. (eds) 1989. Speciation and Its Consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchen A.L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson H.E.H. 1985. The Recognition Concept of Species. In: Vrba E.S. (ed.), Species and Speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, Pretoria: 21-29. Reprinted in McEvey S.F., ed. 1993.Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press., pp. 136-157.

  • Percival W.K. 1987. Biological Analogy in the Study of Language Before the Advent of Comparative Grammar. In: Hoenigswal and Wiener (eds), Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective., pp. 3-38.

  • Pinker S. 1995. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. HarperPerennial, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H. 1975. Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W.V.O. 1986a. Philosophy of Logic. 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W.V.O. 1986b. Reply to Harold N. Lee. In: Hahn L.E. and Schilpp P.A. (eds), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Open Court, La Salle, pp. 315-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup D.M. 1991. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. 1989. The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem. Biology & Philosophy 4: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. 1993. Evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A. 1985. The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe S.N. 1985. Evolving Hierarchical Systems. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson G. 1980. Schools of Linguistics. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure F. 1916. In: Bally C. and Sechehaye A. (eds), Course in General Linguistics. Editions Payot, Paris Roy Harris, trans. (1986). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson G.G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath P.H.A. and Sokal R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song K. and Osborn T.C. 1992. Polyphyletic Origins of Brassica napus: New Evidence Based on Organelle and Nuclear RFLP Analyses. Genome 35: 992-1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos D.N. 1998. Buffon, Darwin, and the Non-Individuality of Species-A Reply to Jean Gayon. Biol. Phil. 13: 443-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos D.N. 1999. Darwin's Species Category Realism. Hist. Phil. Life Sci. 21: 137-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G.L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G.L. 1987. Species Concepts: Semantics and Actual Situations. Biol. Phil. 2: 198-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma K.J. 1990. DNA and Morphology: Inference of Plant Phylogeny. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 5: 104-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub L. 1993. Evolutionary Ideas and 'Empirical' Methods: The Analogy Between Language and Species in Works by Lyell and Schleicher. The Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 26: 171-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask R.L. 1996. Historical Linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba E. 1984. What is Species Selection? Syst. Zool. 33: 318-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward P.D. 1992. On Methuselah's Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells R.S. 1987. The Life and Growth of Language: Metaphors in Biology and Linguistics. In: Hoenigswal and Wiener (eds), Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective., pp. 39-80.

  • Werth C.R., Guttman S.I. and Eshbaugh W.H. 1985. Recurring Origins of Allopolyploid Species in Asplenium. Science 228: 731-733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler Q.D. and Platnick N.I. 2000. The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 55-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener L.F. 1987. Of Phonetics and Genetics: A Comparison of Classification in Linguistic and Organic Systems. In: Hoenigswal and Wiener (eds), Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective., pp. 217-226.

  • Wiley E.O. 1978. The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27: 17-26. Reprinted in Ereshefsky 1992a: 80-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson M. 1990. A Commentary on Ridley's Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem. Biology & Philosophy 5: 433-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I.J. and Stoneburner A. 1992. Isozyme Evidence of Reticulate Evolution in Mosses: Plagiomnium medium is an Allopolyploid of P. ellipticum 3 P. Insigne. Syst. Bot. 17: 532-550.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stamos, D.N. Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology & Philosophy 17, 171–198 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015280225203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015280225203

Navigation