Skip to main content
Log in

Decision Support in Virtual Organizations: The Case for Multi-Agent Support

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new economy, which is being formed by the Internet-based e-commerce and the now emerging mobile commerce, may become what Martin calls a cyber economy. This will combine traditional business with the new e- and mobile business, and will be driven by a new breed of online customers, who operate both wired and wireless networks, who will expect fast delivery, easier transactions and more fact-based information. The cyber economy requires that business is operated with virtual organisations and that decision making in this context – virtual organisations and the cyber economy – will require new and advanced forms of decision support. We have found that a useful decision platform can be built around hyperknowledge and the use of multiple software agents, if the core of these agents is built on fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayer, J., and R. Harter. (1991). “Miner, Manager and Researcher: Three Modes of Analysis of Scanner Data,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 8, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (1997). “Introduction to Software Agents,” in Jeffrey Bradshaw (ed.), Software Agents. AAAI Press/ The MIT Press, pp. 3–46.

  • Carlsson, Christer, and Robert Fullér. (1995). “Active DSS and Approximate Reasoning,” Proceedings of the EUFIT '95 Conference. Aachen: Verlag Mainz, pp. 1209–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlssonz, Christer, and Robert Fullér. (1997). “Problem Solving with Multiple Interdependent Criteria,” in J. Kacprzyk, H. Nurmi, and M. Fedrizzi (eds.), Consensus under Fuzziness. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Christer. (1997). “Fuzzy Logic and Hyperknowledge: A New Effective Paradigm for Active DSS,” Proceedings of HICSS-30. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 324–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Christer, and Robert Fullér. (2000). “Soft Computing and the Bullwhip Effect,” Economics and Complexity, 2000 (in press).

  • Carlsson, Christer, and Robert Fullér. (2000). “Decision Problems with Interdependent Objectives,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 2(2), 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Christer, and Robert Fullér. (2001). “Reducing the Bullwhip Effect by Means of Intelligent Soft Computing Methods,” HICSS-34 Proceedings, 2001.

  • Cheong, F.-C. (1996). Internet Agents: Spiders, Wanderers, Brokers and Bots. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., and K. E. Weick. (1984). “Towards a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems,” Academy of Management Review 9(2), 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahr, V., and R. Stein. (1997). Intelligent Decision Support Systems. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, William H., and Michael S. Malone. (1992). The Virtual Corporation. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21 st Century. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., and S. E. Jackson. (1987). “Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Review 12(1), 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elofson, G., and B. Konsynski. (1991). “Delegation Technologies: Environmental Scanning with Intelligent Agents,” Journal of Management Information Systems 8(1), 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elofson, G., P. M. Beranek, and P. Thomas. (1997). “An Intelligent Agent Community Approach to Knowledge Sharing,” Decision Support Systems 20, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, O., and D. Weld. (1995). “Intelligent Agents on the Internet: Fact, Fiction and Forecast,” IEEE Expert.

  • Etzioni, O., and D. Weld. (1996). “A Softbot-Based Interface to the Internet,” Communications of the ACM 39(7), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., and A. Graesser. (1996). “Is It an Agent or just a Program? A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., and K. Chittipeddi. (1991). “Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation,” SMJ 12(6), 433–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., L. Hurst, B. Nangle, P. Cunningham, F. Somers, and R. Evans. (1998). Software Agents: A Review, available at: http://www.cs.tcd.ie/Brenda.Nangle/iag.html

  • Guttman, R. H., A. G. Moukas, and P. Maes. (1998). “Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: A Survey,” available at: http://ecommerce.media.mit.edu

  • Hermans, B., (1996). Intelligent Software Agents on the Internet: An Inventory of Currently Offered Functionality in the Information Society and A Predication of (Near-) Future Developments. Thesis of Tilberg University, Tilberg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Traci J., Terry R. Rakes, and Loren P. Rees. (1998). “Using Automated Software Planning Agents to Extend the Model Management System in a Decision Support System,” Decision Sciences Institute, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Omnipress, pp. 663–665.

  • Jackson, S., and J. E. Dutton. (1988). “Discerning Threats and Opportunities,” Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 370–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N. R., and M. Wooldridge. (1998). “Applications of Intelligent Agents,” in Nicholas R. Jennings, and Michael J. Wooldridge (eds.), Agent Technology Foundations, Applications, and Markets. Springer-Verlag.

  • Jennings, N. R., Katia Sycara, and M. Wooldridge. (1998). “A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (1984). “Computer Software,” Scientific American 251(3), 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. G. W. (1987). “Decision Support Systems: The Next Decade,” Decision Support Systems 3, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, Ralph, and Howard Raiffa. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D., and D. O'Leary. (1996). “Intelligent Executive Information Systems,” IEEE Expert, December, 30–35.

  • Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang. (1997a). “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The bullwhip Effect,” Management Science 43, 546–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang. (1997b). “The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains,” Sloan Management Review Spring, 93–102.

  • Liu, Shuhua. (1998). “Data Warehousing Agent: In Seeking of Improved Support for Environmental Scanning and Strategic Management,” Proceedings of the 6 th European Conference on Information Systems.

  • Liu, Shuhua. (2000). Improving Executive Support in Strategic Scanning with Software Agent Systems. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1994). “Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload,” Communications of the ACM 71(7), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, George M. (1999). Decision Support Systems in the 21 st Century. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Chuck. (1999). Net Future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, S. (1995). “Software Agents: Application Intelligence Goes Undercover,” DBMS Magazine 8(4), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, N. (1997). “Agents: From Direct Manipulation to Delegation,” in Jeffrey Bradshaw (ed.), Software Agents. AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

  • Neubauer, F. F., and N. B. Solomon. (1977). “A Managerial Approach to Environmental Assessment,” LRP 10, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwana, H. S. (1996). “Software Agents: An Overview,” Knowledge Engineering Review 11(3), 1–40, also available at: http://www.cs.umbc.edu/agents/introduction/ao

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwana, H. S., and D. T. Ndumu. (1997). “An Introduction to Agent Technology,” in Nwana and Azarmi (eds.), Software Agents and Soft Computing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parunak, H. V. D. (1998). “Practical and Industrial Applications of Agent-Based Systems,” Industrial Technology Institute, available at: http://www.cs.umbc.edu/agents/introduction/

  • Schneider, S. C., and A. D. Meyer. (1991). “Interpreting and Responding to Strategic Issues: The Impact of National Culture,” Strategic Management Journal 12, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, B., and A. Sklar. (1963). “Associative Functions and Abstract Semigroups,” Publ. Math. Debrecen 10, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E., and J. Aronson. (2001). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. 6th edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1969). “Intransitivity of Preferences,” Psychological Review 76, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahnemann. (1976). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185, 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, Pirkko, Christer Carlsson, and Shuhua Liu. (2000). “Industry Foresight with Intelligent Agents,” Human Systems Management 19, 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H. J., G. Houdesdal, and R. K. Rainer Jr. (1997). Building Executive Information Systems and Other Decision Support Applications. New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, Ronald R., Sergei Ovchinnikov, Richard M. Tong, and H. T. Nguyen (eds.). (1987). Fuzzy Sets and Applications. Selected Papers by L. A. Zadeh. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, Lotfi A. (1973). “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1983). “The Role of Fuzzy Logic in the Management of Uncertainty in Expert Systems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1988). “A Fuzzy Logic,” IEEE Computer April, 83–93.

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1992). “Knowledge Representation in Fuzzy Logic,” in Yager and Zadeh (eds.). An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1997). “Towards a Theory of Fuzzy Information Granulation and its Centrality in Human Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • UMTS Report. (March 2001). “Durlacher Research Report,” Durlacher Research Institute available at: http:// www.durlacher.com

  • E-Commerce Times. (July 2000). available at: http://www.ecommercetimes.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, C. Decision Support in Virtual Organizations: The Case for Multi-Agent Support. Group Decision and Negotiation 11, 185–221 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015279915874

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015279915874

Keywords

Navigation