Climatic Change

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 413–446 | Cite as

The Consequences of CO2 Stabilisation for the Impacts of Climate Change

  • N. W. Arnell
  • M. G. R. Cannell
  • M. Hulme
  • R. S. Kovats
  • J. F. B. Mitchell
  • R. J. Nicholls
  • M. L. Parry
  • M. T. J. Livermore
  • A. White

Abstract

This paper reports the main results of an assessment of the global-scale implications of the stabilisation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations at 750 ppm (by 2250) and 550 ppm (by 2150), in relationto a scenario of unmitigated emissions. The climate change scenarios were derived from simulation experiments conducted with the HadCM2 global climate model and forced with the IPCC IS92a, S750 and S550 emissions scenarios. The simulated changes in climate were applied to an observed global baseline climatology, and applied with impacts models to estimate impacts on natural vegetation, water resources, coastal flood risk and wetland loss, crop yield and food security, and malaria. The studies used a single set of population and socio-economic scenarios about the future that are similar to those adopted in the IS92a emissions scenario.An emissions pathway which stabilises CO2 concentrations at 750 ppmby the 2230s delays the 2050 temperature increase under unmitigated emissions by around 50 years. The loss of tropical forest and grassland which occurs by the 2050s under unmitigated emissions is delayed to the 22nd century, and the switch from carbon sink to carbon source is delayed from the 2050s to the 2170s. Coastal wetland loss is slowed. Stabilisation at 750 ppm generally has relatively little effect on the impacts of climate change on water resource stress, and populations at risk of hunger or falciparum malaria until the 2080s.A pathway which stabilises CO2 concentrations at 550 ppm by the 2170s delays the 2050 temperature increase under unmitigated emissions by around 100 years. There is no substantial loss of tropical forest or grassland, even by the 2230s, although the terrestrial carbon store ceases to act as a net carbon sink by around 2170 (this time because the vegetation has reached a new equilibrium with the atmosphere). Coastal wetland loss is slowed considerably, and the increase in coastal flood risk is considerably lower than under unmitigated emissions. CO2 stabilisation at 550 ppm reduces substantially water resource stress, relative to unmitigated emissions, but has relatively little impact on populations at risk of falciparum malaria, and may even cause more people to be at risk of hunger. While this study shows that mitigation avoids many impacts, particularly in the longer-term (beyond the 2080s), stabilisation at 550 ppm appears to be necessary to avoid or significantly reduce most of the projected impacts in the unmitigated case.

References

  1. Arnell, N. W.: 1999a, ‘Climate Change and Global Water Resources’, Global Environ. Change 9, S31–S49.Google Scholar
  2. Arnell, N.W.: 1999b, ‘A SimpleWater Balance Model for the Simulation of Streamflow over a Large Geographic Domain’, Journal of Hydrology 217, 314–335.Google Scholar
  3. Bos, E., Vu, M. T., Massiah, E., and Bulatao, R. A.: 1994, World Population Projections 1994–1995: Estimates and Projections with Related Demographic Statistics,World Bank, The Johns Hopkins University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Carnell, R. and Senior, C.A.: 1998, ‘Changes in Mid-Latitude Variability Due to Increasing Greenhouse Gases and Sulphate Aerosols’, Clim. Dyn. 14, 369–383.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, M.: 2000, ‘The El Nino-Southern Oscillation in the Second Hadley Centre Coupled Model and its Response to Greenhouse Warming’, J. Climate 13, 1299–1312.Google Scholar
  6. Energy Modeling Forum: 1995, Second Round Study Design for EMF 14: Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change, Working Paper 14, Energy Modeling Forum, March 1995.Google Scholar
  7. Friend, A. D. and White, A.: 2000, ‘Evaluation and Analysis of a Dynamic Terrestrial Ecosystem Model under Pre-Industrial Conditions at the Global Scale’, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 14, 1173–1190.Google Scholar
  8. Friend, A. D., Stevens, A. K., Knox, R. G., and Cannell, M. G. R.: 1997, ‘A Process Based, Terrestrial Biosphere Model of Ecosystem Dynamics (HYBRID v3.0)’, Ecol. Modelling 95, 249–287.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson-Sellers, A., Zhang, H., Berz, G., and Emanuel, K., et al.: 1998, ‘Tropical Cyclones and Global Climate Change: A Post-IPCC Assessment’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 79, 19–38.Google Scholar
  10. Hoozemans, F. M. J., Marchand, M., and Pennekamp, H. A.: 1993, A Global Vulnerability Analysis: Vulnerability Assessment for Population, Coastal Wetlands and Rice Production on a Global Scale, Delft Hydraulics, The Netherlands, Second Edition.Google Scholar
  11. Hulme, M., Mitchell, J. F. B., Ingram, M., Johns, T., New, M., and Viner, D.: 1999, ‘Climate Change Scenarios for Global Impacts Studies’, Global Environ. Change 9, S3–S19.Google Scholar
  12. IPCC 1997, Stabilisation of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socioeconomic Implications, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Technical Paper III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  13. IPCC 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Johns, T. C., Carnell, R. E., Crossley, J. E., Gregory, J. M., Mitchell, J. F. B., Senior, C. A., Tett, S. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: 1997, ‘The Second Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM: Model Description, Spinup and Validation’, Clim. Dyn. 13, 103–134.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, R. J. T. and Nicholls, R. J.: 1999, ‘Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise’, Ambio 28, 182–187.Google Scholar
  16. Krol, M., Alcamo, J., and Leemans, R.: 1997, ‘Global and Regional Impacts of Stabilising Atmospheric CO2’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1, 341–361.Google Scholar
  17. Knutson, T. R., Tuleya, R. E., and Kurihara, Y.: 1998, ‘Simulated Increase in Hurricane Intensities in a CO2-Warmed Climate’, Science 279, 1018–1020.Google Scholar
  18. Leggett, J. A., Pepper, W. J., and Swart, R. J.: 1992, ‘Emissions Scenarios for IPCC - an Update’, in Houghton, J. T. et al. (eds), Climate Change 1992 - The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 69–95.Google Scholar
  19. Martens, P., Kovats, S., Nijhof, S., and de Vries, P., et al.: 1999, ‘Climate Change and Future Populations at Risk of Malaria’, Global Environ. Change 9, S89–S107.Google Scholar
  20. McMichael, A., Haines, A., Sloof, R., and Kovats, S. (eds.): 1996, Climate Change and Human Health, World Health Organisation, Geneva, p. 297.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, J. F. B., Johns, T. C., Eagles, M., Ingram, W. J., and Davies, R. A.: 1999, ‘Towards the Development of Climate Change Scenarios’, Clim. Change 41, 547–581.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, J. F. B., Johns, T. C., Ingram, W. J., and Lowe, J. A.: 2000, ‘The Effect of Stabilising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations on Global and Regional Climate Change’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2997–3100.Google Scholar
  23. New, M. G., Hulme, M., and Jones, P. D.: 1999, ‘Representing Twentieth Century Space-Time Climate Variability, Part 1: Development of a 1961–1990 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology’, J. Climate 12, 829–856.Google Scholar
  24. Nicholls, R. J., Hoozemans, F. M. J., and Marchand, M.: 1999, ‘Increasing Flood Risk and Wetland Losses Due to Global Sea Level Rise: Regional and Global Analyses’, Global Environ. Change 9, S69–S87.Google Scholar
  25. Parry, M. L., Arnell, N. W., Hulme, M., Nicholls, R., and Livermore, M.: 1998, ‘Adapting to the Inevitable’, Nature 395, p. 741.Google Scholar
  26. Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Fischer, G., and Livermore, M. T. J.: 1999, ‘Climate Change and World Food Security: A New Assessment’, Global Environ. Change 9, S51–S67.Google Scholar
  27. Raskin, P., Gleick, P., Kirshen, P., Pontius, G., and Strzepek, K.: 1997, Water Futures: Assessment of Long-range Patterns and Problems, Background Report for the Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, p. 78.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenzweig, C. and Parry, M. L.: 1994, ‘Potential Impacts of Climate Change on World Food Supply’, Nature 367, 133–138.Google Scholar
  29. Shiklomanov, I. A.: 1998, Asssessment ofWater Resources andWater Availability in the World, Background Report for the Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, p. 88.Google Scholar
  30. White, A., Cannell, M. G. R., and Friend, A. D.: 1999, ‘Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystems and the Terrestrial Carbon Sink: A New Assessment’, Global Environ. Change 9, S21–S30.Google Scholar
  31. White, A., Cannell, M. G. R., and Friend, A. D.: 2000, ‘CO2 Stabilisation, Climate Change and the Terrestrial Carbon Sink’, Global Change Biology 6, 817–833.Google Scholar
  32. Wigley, T. M. L.: 1998, ‘The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and Climate Implications’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2285–2288.Google Scholar
  33. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 1993, ‘Future Changes in Global Temperature and Mean Sea Level’, in Warrick, R. A., Barrow, E. M., and Wigley, T. M. L. (eds.), Climate and Sea Level Change: Observations, Projections and Implications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111–133.Google Scholar
  34. Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, L., and Edmonds, J. A.: 1996, ‘Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilisation of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations’, Nature 379, 242–245.Google Scholar
  35. World Meteorological Organisation 1997, Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World, WMO, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. W. Arnell
    • 1
  • M. G. R. Cannell
    • 2
  • M. Hulme
    • 3
  • R. S. Kovats
    • 4
  • J. F. B. Mitchell
    • 5
  • R. J. Nicholls
    • 6
  • M. L. Parry
    • 7
  • M. T. J. Livermore
    • 8
  • A. White
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of SouthamptonU.K
  2. 2.NERC Centre for Ecology and HydrologyEdinburghU.K
  3. 3.Tyndall Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of East AngliaU.K
  4. 4.Centre on Globalisation, Environmental Change and HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineU.K
  5. 5.Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and ResearchU.K
  6. 6.Flood Hazard Research CentreMiddlesex UniversityU.K
  7. 7.Jackson Environment InstituteUniversity of East AngliaU.K
  8. 8.Climatic Research UnitUniversity of East AngliaU.K
  9. 9.Department of MathematicsHeriot-Watt UniversityU.K

Personalised recommendations