Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for Assessment and Monitoring of Arthropods in a Lowland Tropical Forest

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By applying principles of adaptive management, and by using the valuable information that arthropods provide from assessment and monitoring programs, managers can identify and reduce possible impacts on biodiversity in development projects. In 1996, the Smithsonian Institution's Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity program worked together with Shell Prospecting and Development Peru to establish an adaptive management program to protect biodiversity in a natural gas exploration project in a Peruvian rainforest. In this paper, we outlined the conceptual steps involved in establishing an assessment and monitoring program for arthropods, including setting objectives, evaluating the results and making decisions. We also present the results of the assessment using some of groups of arthropods, and summarize the steps taken to identify appropriate groups for monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosti, D., Majer, J. D., Alonso, L. E. and Schultz, T. R.: 2000, Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, A. and Dallmeier, F.: 1998, Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: Cashiriari-3 Well Site and the Camisea and Urubamba Rivers. SI/MAB Series #2, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Alonso, A. and Dallmeier, F.: 1999, Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: Pagoreni Well Site: Assessment and Training, SI/MAB Series #3, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Alonso, A. and Dallmeier, F.: 2000, Working for Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution/Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Alonso, A., Dallmeier, F., Granek, E. and Raven, P.: 2001, Biodiversity: Connecting with the Tapestry of Life, Smithsonian Institution/Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program and President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S. E. and Pyle, R.: 2000, ‘Quantifying biodiversity: experience with parataxonomists and digital photography in New Guinea and Guyana', BioScience 50, 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P., Comiskey, D., Alonso, A., Dallmeier, F., Nuñez, P., Beltran, H., Baldeon, S., Nauray, W., De La Colina, R., Acurio, L. and Udvardy, S.: 2002, ‘Modified Whittaker plots as an assessment and monitoring tool for vegetation in a lowland tropical rainforest', Environ. Monit. Assess. 76, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. E., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E. Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C. and Diaz, S.: 2000, ‘Consequences of changing biodiversity', Nature 405, 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K.: 1997, EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 5. User's Guide and Application, Published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates

  • Colwell, R. K. and Coddington, J. A.: 1994, ‘Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation', Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B 345, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiskey, J., Dallmeier, F. and Alonso, A.: 2000, ‘Framework for Assessment and Monitoring of Biodiversity', in: Levin, S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Princeton, USA.

  • Comiskey, J. A., Campbell, P., Alonso, A., Mistry, S., Dallmeier, F., Nuñez, P., Beltran, H., Baldeon, S., Nauray, W., de la Colina, W., Acurio, L. and Udvardy, S.: 2001, ‘Vegetation Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru', in: F. Dallmeier, A. Alonso and P. Campbell (eds.), Biodiversity of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru, SIMAB Series 7, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Dallmeier, F. and Alonso, A.: 1997, Biodiversity Assessment of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru: San Martin-3 and Cashiriari-2 Well Sites, SI/MAB Series #1, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W. and Willoughby, J. W.: 1998, Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, T. L.: 1982, ‘Tropical forests: Their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species', Coleopterists Bull. 36, 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnamore, A. T.: 1996, The Advantages of Using Arthropods in Ecosystem Management. A Brief from the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Provincial Museum of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnamore, A. T.: 1997, ‘Long-term Monitoring of Arthropod Fauna in the Lower Urubamba Region', in: F. Dallmeier and A. Alonso (eds.), Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region, PerÚ: San Martin-3 and Cashiriari-2 Well Sites, SI/MAB Series #1, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Finnamore, A. T., Winchester, N. N. and Behan-Pelletier, V. M.: 1998, Protocols for Measuring Biodiversity, Arthropod Monitoring in Terrestrial Ecosystems, The Biodiversity Science Board of Canada, Published on line at: http://www.cciw.ca/eman

  • Goldsmith, F. B. (ed.): 1991, Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology, Conservation Biology Series 3, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. M.: 1992, ‘Species Inventory', in: B. Groom-bridge (ed.), Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, D. L. and Ritchie, J. M.: 1993. Biodiversity and Biosystematic Priorities: Microorganisms and Invertebrates, CAB International, Wallingford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell, J. M.: 1991, ‘Development of a Rationale for Monitoring', in: F. B. Goldsmith (ed.), Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology, Conservation Biology Series 3, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (ed.): 1978, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., Colwell, R. K., Erwin, T. L., Murphy, D. D., Noss, R. F. and Sanjayan, M. A.: 1993, ‘Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning', Conserv. Biol. 7, 796–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, W. J., Heyer, W. R., Acevedo, P., Coddington, J., Cole, D., Erwin, T. L., Meggers, B. J. and Pogue, M.: 1998, ‘Amazonian biodiversity: Assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data', Biod. Conserv. 7(12), 1577–1587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T. E.: 1997, ‘Biodiversity: What is it?', in: M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson and E. O. Wilson (eds.), Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting Our Biological Resources, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer, J. D.: 1987, The Role of Invertebrates in Conservation and Biological Surveys, Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M.: 1990, ‘How many species?', Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B 330(1257), 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine, C.: 1999, Humans and Other Catastrophes: Perspectives on Extinction, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Gil, P. R. and Mittermeier, C. G.: 1999, Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions, Cemex, Conservation International and Agrupacion Sierra Madre, Monterrey, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N.: 1986, ‘Tropical Deforestation and a Mega-extinctions Spasm', in: M. Soule (ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science and Scarcity of Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. and Brooks, T.: 1999, ‘The Sixth Extinction: How Large, Where, and When?', in: Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World, The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.: 1996, Species Diversity in Space and Time, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I. F.: 1991, Monitoring Ecological Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I. F.: 1992, Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork, N. E.: 1988, ‘Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation', Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 35, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C.: 1997, ‘Tropical Forest Disturbance, Disappearance and Species Loss', in: W. F. Laurance and R. O. Bierregaard (eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1987, ‘The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates)', Conserv. Biol. 1, 344–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finnamore, A., Alonso, A., Santisteban, J. et al. A Framework for Assessment and Monitoring of Arthropods in a Lowland Tropical Forest. Environ Monit Assess 76, 43–53 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015268804354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015268804354

Navigation