Skip to main content
Log in

A Human CpG Island Randomly Inserted Into a Plant Genome is Protected From Methylation

  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vertebrate genomes the dinucleotide CpG is heavily methylated, except in CpG islands, which are normally unmethylated. It is not clear why the CpG islands are such poor substrates for DNA methyltransferase. Plant genomes display methylation, but otherwise the genomes of plants and animals represent two very divergent evolutionary lines. To gain a further understanding of the resistance of CpG islands to methylation, we introduced a human CpG island from the proteasome-like subunit I gene into the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results show that prevention of methylation is an intrinsic property of CpG islands, recognized even if a human CpG island is transferred to a plant genome. Two different parts of the human CpG island – the promoter region/ first exon and exon2–4 – both displayed resistance against methylation, but the promoter/ exon1 construct seemed to be most resistant. In contrast, certain sites in a plant CpG-rich region used as a control transgene were always methylated. The frequency of silencing of the adjacent nptII (KmR) gene in the human CpG constructs was lower than observed for the plant CpG-rich region. These results have implications for understanding DNA methylation, and for construction of vectors that will reduce transgene silencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antequera F and Bird A (1993) CpG islands. In: Jost JP and Saluz HP (eds) DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antequera F and Bird A (1999) CpG islands as genomic footprints of promoters that are associated with replication origins. Curr Biol 9: R661–R667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assaad FF, Tucker KL and Signer ER (1993) Epigenetic repeat-induced gene silencing (RIGS) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 22: 1067–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat A, Gallois P, Raynal M, Mestre-Ortega D, Sallaud C, Guiderdoni E, Delseny M and Bernardi G (2000) The distribution of T-DNA in the genomes of transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. FEBS Lett 471: 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat A, Matassi G and Bernardi G (1998) Distribution of genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana and its implications for the genome organization of plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10044–10049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestor TH, Gundersen G, Kolstø A-B and Prydz H (1992) CpG islands in mammalian gene promoters are inherently resistant to de novo methylation. Genet Anal Tech Appl 9: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird AP (1986) CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321: 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird AP (1992) The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell 70: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden AH, Ward CA, Nalin CM and Weissbach A (1986) The primary DNA sequence determines in vitro methylation by mam-malian DNA methyltransferases. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 33: 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis M, Frank D, Keshet I, Siegfried Z, Mendelsohn M, Nemes A, Temper V, Razin A and Cedar H (1994) Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature 371: 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carotti D, Palitti F, Lavia P and Strom R (1989) In vitro methylation of CpG-rich islands. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 9219–9229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux J, Haeberli P and Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elomaa P, Helariutta Y, Griesbach RJ, Kotilainen M, Seppanen P and Teeri TH (1995) Transgene inactivation in Petunia hybrida is influenced by the properties of the foreign gene. Mol Gen Genet 248: 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP (1993) Genomic imprinting and gene activation in cancer. Nature Genet 4: 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner-Garden M and Frommer M (1987) CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 196: 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner-Garden M and Frommer M (1992) Significant CpG-rich regions in angiosperm genes. J Mol Evol 34: 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen G, Kolstø AB, Larsen F and Prydz H (1992) Tissue-specific methylation of a CpG island in transgenic mice. Gene 113: 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemsdal SS, Hughes W, Lønneborg A, Aalen RB and Olsen OA (1991) Primary structure of a novel barley gene differentially expressed in immature aleurone layers. Mol Gen Genet 228: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncz C and Schell J (1986) The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooter JM, Matzke MA and Meyer P (1999) Listening to the silent genes: transgene silencing, gene regulation and pathogen control. Trends Plant Sci 4: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R and Prydz H (1992) CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 13: 1095–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen F, Solheim J, Kristensen T, Kolstø AB and Prydz H (1993) A tight cluster of five unrelated human genes on chromosome 16q22.1. Hum Mol Genet 2: 1589–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutwiler L, Hough-Evans B and Meyerowitz E (1984) The DNA of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 194: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod D, Charlton J, Mullins J and Bird AP (1994) Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev 8: 2282–2292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal A, Lång V, Orczyk W and Palva ET (1993) Improved efficiency for the T-DNA-mediated transformation and plasmid rescue in Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor Appl Genet 86: 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehtali M, LeMeur M and Lathe R (1990) The methylation-free status of a housekeeping transgene is lost at high copy number. Gene 91: 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P and Heidmann I (1994) Epigenetic variants of a transgenic petunia line show hypermethylation in trans-gene DNA: an indication for specific recognition of foreign DNA in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 243: 390–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel J-B, Mourrain P, Béclin C and Vaucheret H (2000) DNA methylation and chromatin structure affect transcriptional and post-transcriptional transgene silencing in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 10: 1591–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T and Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröls F and Meyer P (1992) The methylation patterns of chromosomal integration regions influence gene activity of transferred DNA in Petunia hybrida. Plant J 2: 465–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs AD and Pfeifer GP (1992) X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory. Trends Genet 8: 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinum TM, Berner HS, Stacy RAP, Salehian Z and Aalen RB (1998) Differential regulation of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) transcripts B22E and B12D in mature aleurone layers. Physiol Plant 102: 337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedie S and Bird A (2000) Gene expression. Mutant weed breaks silence. Nature 405: 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kjetill S. Jakobsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meza, T.J., Enerly, E., Børud, B. et al. A Human CpG Island Randomly Inserted Into a Plant Genome is Protected From Methylation. Transgenic Res 11, 133–142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015244400941

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015244400941

Navigation