Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Is Said And Psychological Reality; Grice's Project And Relevance Theorists' Criticisms

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bach, K.: 1994, 'Conversational Impliciture', Mind and Language 9, 124-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: 2001a, 'You Don't Say?', Synthese 128, 15-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: 2001b, 'Seemingly Semantic Intuitions', in J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke, and D. Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics, Seven Bridges Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: forthcoming, 'Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language', in L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Bezuidenhout, A.: 1996, 'Pragmatics and Singular Reference', Mind and Language 11(2), 133-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, D.: 1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, D.: 1992, Understanding Utterances, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E.: manuscript, Saying What YouMean: Unarticulated Constituents and Communication.

  • Carston, R.: 1991, 'Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics', in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1971, 'The Logical Particles of Natural Language', in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W.: 1998, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carpintero, M.: 2001, 'Gricean Rational Reconstructions and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction', Synthese 128, 93-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S.: 1992, 'Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 509-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F.: 1991, 'The Pragmatics of What is Said', in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F.: 2001, What is Said, Synthese 128, 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J.: 2001, 'Critical Study of Wayne Davis', Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory', Noû s 35(4), 630-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J.: 2002, 'Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated', Noû s.

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1981, 'On Grice's Theory of Conversation', in P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdo

    Jennifer M. Saul

Authors
  1. Jennifer M. Saul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saul, J.M. What Is Said And Psychological Reality; Grice's Project And Relevance Theorists' Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 347–372 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015221313887

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015221313887

Keywords

Search

Navigation