Skip to main content
Log in

Agrobotanical traits and chemical composition of Cassia obtusifolia L.: A lesser-known legume of the Western Ghats region of South India

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four accessions of the lesser-known legume, Cassia obtusifolia L. (Sickle pod), collected from four different agroclimatic regions of Western Ghats, were evaluated for agrobotanical traits and chemical composition. Amongthe four accessions, the Keriparai accession had the highest values for plant height (cm), number of flowers per cluster, number of pods per cluster, pod length (cm), seeds per pod, seed weight (g) per pod and seed recovery percentage. Crude protein ranged from 18.56–22.93%, crude lipid was between 5.35–7.40%, crude fiber ranged from 6.83–9.45%, ash content ranged from 5.14–5.83% and carbohydrate varied from 57.00–60.69%. Globulins constituted the bulk of the seed protein as in most legumes. Mineral profiles, viz., sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, iron, copper, zinc and manganese ranged from 42.92–84.83, 758.05–1555.79, 559.92–791.72, 456.36–709.47, 629.13–947.79, 8.42–12.35, 0.93–2.06, 10.60–30.04 and 2.12–4.12 Mg/100 g seeds flour, respectively. Seed proteins of all accessions exhibited relatively high levels of non-essential and essential amino acids, with the exception of threonine. The in vitro protein digestibility of the legume ranged from 74.66 to 81.44%. Antinutritional substances such as total free phenolics ranged from 0.34–0.66%; tannins were between 0.47–0.60%, L-DOPA content ranged from 0.98–1.34%; trypsin inhibitor activity varied from 11.4–13.5 TIU/mg protein and chymotrypsin inhibitor activity ranged from 10.8–12.3 CIU/mg protein. Phytohemagglutinating activity also was assayed. Inconclusion, the accessions of C. obtusifolia, collected from Western Ghats, South India, could serve as a low-cost source of some important nutrients for humans. The antinutritional factors might have little nutritional significance, if the seeds are processed properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gadgil M (1996) Documenting diversity: An experiment. Curr Sci 70: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sastry ARK, Sharma BD (1991) The significance of Western Ghats in plant conservation. In: Karunakaran CK (ed), The Proceedings of the Symposium on Rare, Endangered and Endemic Plants of theWestern Ghats. Trivandram, India: Kerala Forest Department.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh HB, Arora RK (1978) Wild Edible Plants of India. New Delhi, India: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vadivel V, Janardhanan K (1998) Genetic resources of some South Indian tribal pulses. IPGRI Newslett Asia Pacific Oceania 26: 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balogun AM, Fetuga BL (1986) Chemical composition of some under-exploited leguminous crop seeds in Nigeria. J Agric Food Chem 34: 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K, Janardhanan K (1995) Nutritional and antinutritional properties of the under-exploited legumes Cassia laevigata Wild. and Tamarindus indica L. J Food Comp Anal 8: 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakiunari K, Janardhanan K (1993) Genetic resources of tribal pulses. FAO/IPGRI Plant Genet Resour Newslett 96: 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh V, Premanath RK (1992) Some useful Cassia in India. J Econ Tax Bot 10: 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford L, McDonald GM, Friedman M (1990) Composition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) toxic weed seeds. J Agric Food Chem 38: 2169–2175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gunjatkar N, Vartak VD (1982) Enumeration of wild edible legumes from Pune district, Maharashtra State. J Econ Tax Bot 3: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Humphries EC (1956) Mineral components and ash analysis. In: Paech K, Tracey MV (eds), Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp 469–502.

    Google Scholar 

  12. AOAC (1970) Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muller HG, Tobin G (1980) Nutrition and Food Processing. London: Croom Helm Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Issac RA, Johnson WC (1975) Collaborative study of wet and dry ashing techniques for the elemental analysis of plant tissue by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. J AOAC 58: 436–440.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dickman SR, Bray RH (1940) Colorimetric determination of phosphate. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 12: 665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basha SMM, Cherry JP, Young CT (1976) Changes in free amino acids, carbohydrates and proteins of maturing seeds from various peas (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Cereal Chem 53: 583–597.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murray DR (1979) The seed protein of kowhai, Sophora microphylla AIT. Z Pflanzenphysiol 93: 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rajendra W (1987) High performance liquid chromatographic determination of amino acids in biological samples by precolumn derivatization with O-phthaldialdehyde. J Liq Chromatogr 10: 941–945.

    Google Scholar 

  20. FAO/WHO (1991) Protein Quality Evaluation. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, p 66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ilsu IIW, Vavak DL, Satterlee LD, Miller GA (1977) A multienzyme technique for estimating protein digestibilily. J Food Sci 42: 1269–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bray KR, Thorne WV (1954) Analysis of phenolic compounds. Meth Biochem Anal 1: 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burns RR (1971) Methods for estimation of tannins in gram, Sorghum. Agron J 63: 511–512.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brain KR (1976) Accumulation of L-DOPA in cultures from Mucuna pruriens. Plant Sci Lett 7: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kakade ML, Rackis JJ, McGhee JE, Puski G (1974) Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: A collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem 51: 376–382.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kakade ML, Swenson DH, Liener IE (1970) Note on the determination of chymotrypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor activity using casein. Anal Biochem 33: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liener IE (1976) Phytohaemagglutinins (phytolectins). Ann Rev Plant Physiol 27: 291–319.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Narasinga Rao BS, Deosthale YG, Pant KC (1989) Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. Hyderabad, India: Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Nutrition.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meiners CR, Derise NL, Lau IIC, Ritchey SJ, Murphy EW (1976) Proximate composition and yield of raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J Agric Food Chem 24: 1122–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boulter D, Derbyshire D (1976) The general properties, classification and distribution of plant proteins. In: Norton G (ed), Plant Proteins. London: Butterworths, pp 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vadivel V, Janardhanan K, Vijayakumari K (1997) Diversity in agrobotanical, nutritional and antinutritional compounds in the germplasm of Cassia occidentalis L. collected from Tamil Nadu, India. Acta Bot Indica 25: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ukhun ME, Ifebigh EO (1988) Compositional chemistry of Cassia alata seeds. Food Chem 30: 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meiners CR, Derise NL, Lau HC, Crews MG, Ritchey SJ, Murphy EW (1976) The content of nine mineral elements in raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J Agric Food Chem 24: 1126–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Omode AA, Fatoki OS, Olaogun KA (1995) Physiochemical properties of some underexploited and unconventional oilseeds. J Agric Food Chem 43: 2850–2853.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vijayakumari K, Siddhuraju P, Janardhanan K (1993) Nutritional and anti-nutritional properties of under-exploited legume seeds. Intl J Food Sci Nutr 44: 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singh U (1993) Protein quality of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) as influenced by seed polyphenols and cooking process. Plant Food Hum Nutr 43: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Singh U, Eggum BO (1984) Factors affecting the protein quality of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Plant Food Hum Nutr 34: 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rani N, Hira CK (1998) Effect of different treatments on chemical constituents of mash beans (Vigna mungo). J Food Sci Technol 35: 540–542.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Uzogara SG, Morton ID, Daniel JW (1990) Changes in some antinutrients of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) processed with 'kanwa' alkaline salt. Plant Food Hum Nutr 40: 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mohamed AI, Rangappa M (1992) Screening soybean (grain and vegetable) genotypes for nutrients and anti-nutritional factors. Plant Food Hum Nutr 42: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Antunes PL, Sgarbieri VC (1980) Effect of heat treatment on the toxicity and nutritive value of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris var. Rosinha G2) proteins. J Agric Food Chem 28: 935–938.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liener IE (1994) Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 31–67.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mohan VR, Janardhanan K (1995) Chemical determination of nutritional and antinutritional properties in tribal pulses. J Food Sci Technol 32: 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakiunari K, Janardhanan K (1996) Chemical composition and protein quality of the little-known legume, velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC.). J Agric Food Chem 44: 2636–2641.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadivel, V., Janardhanan, K. Agrobotanical traits and chemical composition of Cassia obtusifolia L.: A lesser-known legume of the Western Ghats region of South India. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 57, 151–164 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015218512666

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015218512666

Navigation