Expanding Service Delivery: Does It Improve Relationships Among Agencies Serving Homeless People with Mental Illness?

  • James McGuire
  • Robert Rosenheck
  • Craig Burnette
Article

Abstract

Enhancing interagency services integration for homeless people has been advocated as an approach for improving service delivery to this population. In contrast to system-level “top-down” interventions, this study examines the association of expanded funding of client-level homeless services, a “bottom-up” approach, with strengthening of interorganizational relationships. We compared Veterans Affairs/non-Veterans Affairs interagency relationships at VA facilities supporting community-oriented programs (N=72), at VA facilities supporting on-site internally focused homeless programs (N=10), and at facilities with no specialized homeless programs (N=47). VA facilities that supported community-oriented homeless programs enjoyed stronger VA-community agency relationships than the other two VA facility types. The study identifies an effective bottom-up resource-based approach to services integration.

interorganizational relationship mentally ill homeless veterans service coordination service integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bachrach, L.L. (1976). Deinstitutionalization: An analytic review and sociological perspective. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  2. Blackwell, B., Breakey, W., & Hammersley, D. (1990). Psychiatric and mental health services. In P.W. Brickner, L.K. Scharer, & B.A. Conanan (Eds.), Under the safety net: The health and welfare of the homeless in the United States (pp. 184–203). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Burnette, C.W., & McGuire, J.F. (1998, July 31). Community homelessness assessment, local education and networking groups (CHALENG) for veterans: The fourth annual progress report on Public Law 105–114. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Cocozza, J.J., Steadman, H.J., Dennis, D.L., Blasinsky, M., Randolph, F.L., Johnsen, M., & Goldman, H.H. (2000). Successful systems integration strategies: The ACCESS program for persons who are homeless and mentally ill. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 27(6), 395–407.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldman, H.H., & Morrissey, J.P. (1985). The alchemy of mental health policy: Homelessness and the fourth cycle of reform. American Journal of Public Health, 75, 727–731.Google Scholar
  7. Goldman, H.H., Morrissey, J.P., & Ridgely, M.S. (1994). Evaluating the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness. Milbank Quarterly, 72(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman, H.H., Morrissey, J.P., Ridgely, M.S., Frank, R.G., Newman, S.J., & Kennedy, C. (1992). Lessons from the Program on Chronic Mental Illness. Health Affairs, 11(3), 51–68.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, R.H., Clark, J.C., Giordano, P.C., Johnson, P.V., & Van Roekel, M. (1977). Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 457–474.Google Scholar
  10. Interagency Council on the Homeless (1992). Outcasts on main street: Report of the Federal Task Force on Homelessness and Severe Mental Illness (DHHS Publication [ADM] 92-1904). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  11. Kasprow, W.J., Rosenheck, R., & Chapdelaine, J. (1998). Health care for homeless veterans programs: Eleventh progress report. West Haven, CT: Northeast Program Evaluation Center.Google Scholar
  12. Lehman, A.F., Postrado, L.T., Roth, D., McNary, S.W., & Goldman, H.H. (1995). Continuity of care and client outcomes in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness. The Milbank Quarterly, 72, 105–122.Google Scholar
  13. Levine, S., & White, P.E. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly. 5, 583–601.Google Scholar
  14. McGuire, J.F. (1994). Re-painting the Golden Gate Bridge: Coordination of services for abducted children reunited with their families. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 11(2), 149–166.Google Scholar
  15. McKinney, M.M. (1991). Organization of HIV-related services under the Ryan White C.A.R.E. Act: Issues and priorities for future research. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  16. Mechanic, D. (1991). Strategies for integrating public mental health services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42(8), 797–801.Google Scholar
  17. Morrissey, J.P. (1992). An interorganizational network approach to evaluating children' mental health service systems. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 50, 85–98.Google Scholar
  18. Morrissey, J.P., Ridgely, M.S., Goldman, H.H., & Bartko, W.T. (1994). Assessments of community mental health support systems: A key informant approach. Community Mental Health Journal 30(6), 565–579.Google Scholar
  19. Mulford, C.L., & Rogers, D.L. (1982). Definitions and models. In D.L. Rogers & D.A. Whetten (Eds.), Interorganizational coordination: Theory, research, and implementation (pp. 9–31). Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Randolph, F.L., Blasinsky, M., Leginski, W., Parker, L.B., & Goldman, H.H. (1997). Creating integrated service systems for homeless persons with mental illness: The ACCESS Program. Access to community care and effective services and supports. Psychiatric Services, 48(3), 369–373.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenheck, R., Frisman, L., & Chung, A. (1994). The proportion of veterans among homeless men. American Journal of Public Health, 84(3), 466–469.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenheck, R., & Leda, C. (1991). Who is served by programs for the homeless? Admission to a domiciliary care program for homeless veterans. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 176–181.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenheck, R., Leda, C., & Gallup, P.G. (1992). Program design and clinical operation of two national VA programs for homeless mentally ill veterans. New England Journal of Public Policy, 8, 315–337.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenheck, R., Leda, C., Gallup, P., Astrachan, B., Milstein, R., Leaf, P., Thompson, D., & Errera, P. (1989). Initial assessment data from a 43-site program for homeless chronically mentally ill veterans. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 937–942.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenheck, R., Morrissey, J., Lam, J., Calloway, M., Johnsen, M., Goldman, H., Randolph, F., Blasinsky, M., Fontana, A., Calsyn, R., & Teague, G. (1998). Service system integration, access to services, and housing outcomes for homeless persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 88(11), 1610–1615.Google Scholar
  26. Seibyl, C.L., Rosenheck, R., Medak, S., Corwel, L. (1998). The ninth progress report on the Domiciliary Care for Homeless Veterans Program. West Haven, CT: Northeast Program Evaluation Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • James McGuire
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Rosenheck
    • 3
    • 1
  • Craig Burnette
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Veterans Affairs Northeast Program Evaluation Center (NEPEC)USA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryYale School of MedicineNew Haven
  4. 4.Community Homelessness Assessment, Local Education, and Networking Groups)Department of Veterans Affairs Project CHALENG (USA
  5. 5.Atlanta VA Medical Center

Personalised recommendations