Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inverse Relationship of Protein Concentration and Aggregation

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the effect of protein concentration on aggregation induced through quiescent shelf-life incubation or shipping-related agitation.

Methods. All aggregation was measured by size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography. Aggregation was induced by time-dependent incubation under stationary conditions or by agitation caused by shaking, vortexing, or vibration using simulated shipping conditions.

Results. Protein aggregation is commonly a second- or higher-order process that is expected to increase with higher protein concentration. As expected, for three proteins (PEG-GCSF, PEG-MGDF, and OPG-Fc) that were examined, the aggregation increased with higher protein concentration if incubated in a quiescent shelf-life setting. However, aggregation decreased with higher protein concentration if induced by an air/water interface as a result of agitation. This unexpected result may be explained by the rate-limiting effect on aggregation of the air/water interface and the critical nature of the air/water interface to protein ratio that is greatest with decreased protein concentration. The non-ionic detergent polysorbate 20 enhanced the aggregation observed in the quiescently incubated sample but abrogated the aggregation induced by the air/water interface.

Conclusions. The effect of protein concentration was opposite for aggregation that resulted from quiescent shelf-life treatment compared to induction by agitation. For motionless shelf-life incubation, increased concentration of protein resulted in more aggregation. However, exposure to agitation resulted in more aggregation with decreased protein concentration. These results highlight an unexpected complexity of protein aggregation reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. C. Manning, K. Patel, and R. Borchardt. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals. Pharm. Res. 6:903–918 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. Cleland, M. Powell, and S. Shire. The development of stable protein formulations: A close look at protein aggregation, deamidation, and oxidation. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 10:307–377 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. F. Carpenter, B. S. Kendrick, B. S. Chang, M. C. Manning, and T. W. Randolph. Inhibition of stress-induced aggregation of protein therapeutics. In R. Wetzel (ed.), Methods in Enzymology, vol. 309, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1999 pp. 236–255 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. K. Adam. In The Physics and Chemistry of Surfaces, Oxford University Press, London, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Rothen. Films of protein in biologic processes. Adv. Protein Chem. 3:123–128 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. F. Cheesman and J. T. Davies. Physicochemical and biologic aspects of proteins at interfaces. Adv. Protein Chem. 9:439–498 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Wetzel. Amyloid, prions, and other protein aggregates. In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 309, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. L. Fink. Protein aggregation: folding aggregates, inclusion bodies and amyloid. Folding & Design 3:R9–R23 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Gidalevitz, H. Zhengoing, and S. A. Rice. Protein folding at the air-water interface studied with X-ray reflectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2608–2611 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. A. Kerwin, M. C. Heller, S. H. Levin, and T. W. Randolph. Effects of Tween 80 and sucrose on acute short-term stability and long-term storage at-20C of a recombinant hemoglobin. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:1062–1068 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Lumry and H. Eyring. Conformation changes of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 58:110–120 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Zettlmeissl, R. Rudolph, and R. Jaenicke. Reconstitution of lactic dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 18:5567–5571 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. D. Bartley, J. M. Bogenberger, R. A. Bosselman, P. Hunt, O. B. Kinstler, and B. B. Smal. Compositions and Methods for stimulating megakaryocyte growth and differentiation. World Patent Publication 26:746–918 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for random vibration testing of shipping containers. D 4728-91, 287-291 (ASTM Committee on Standards, 1916 Race St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, approved Dec. 15, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. F. Henson, J. R. Mitchell, and P. R. Musselwhite. The surface coagulation of proteins during shaking. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 32:162–165 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. L. Donaldson, E. F. Boonstra, and J. M. Hammond. Kinetics of protein denaturation at gas-liquid interfaces.J. Colloid Interface Sci. 74:441–450 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. MacRitchie. Spread monolayers of proteins. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 25:341–385 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. Vogel. Fibronectin in a surface-adsorbed state: Insolubilization and self-assembly. In T.A. Horbet and J.L. Brash (eds.), Protein at interfaces II: fundamentals and applications, ACS Symposium series, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995, 602: pp. 505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y.-F. Maa and C. C. Hsu. Protein denaturation by combined effect of shear and air-liquid interface. Biotech. Bioeng. 54:503–512 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. L. Levine, T. C. Ransohoff, R. T. Kawahata, and W. C. Mc-Gregor. The use of surface tension measurements in the design of antibody-based product formulations. J. Par. Sci. Tech. 45:160–165 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. W. Niven, S. J. Prestrelski, M. J. Treuheit, A. Y. Ip, and T. Arakawa. Protein nebulization II. Stabilization of G-CSF to airjet nebulization and the role of protectants. Int. J. Pharm. 127: 191–201 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Ibanoglu and S. Ibanoglu. Foaming behavior of EDTA-treated ?-lactalbumin. Food Chem. 66:477–481 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Millqvist-Fureby, M. Malmsten, and B. Bergenstahl. Spray-drying of trypsin, surface characterisation and activity preservation. Int. J. Pharm. 188:243–253 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Greem, T. J. Su, H. Joy, and J. R. Lu. Interaction of lysozyme and sodium dodecyl sulfate at the air-liquid interface. Langmuir 16:5797–5805 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Bush, C. Webb, L. Bartlett, and B. Burnett. The formulation of recombinant factor IX: Stability, robustness, and convenience. Semin. Hematol. 35:18–21 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y.-F. Maa, P.-A. T. Nguyen, and S. W. Hsu. Spray-drying of air-liquid interface sensitive recombinant human growth hormone. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:152–159 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Katakam and A. K. Banga. Use of poloxamer polymers to stabilize recombinant human growth hormone against various processing stresses. Pharm. Dev. Tech. 2:143–149 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. A. Charman, K. L. Mason, and W. N. Charman. Techniques for assessing the effects of pharmaceutical excipients on the aggregation of porcine growth hormone. Pharm. Res. 10:954–962 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. DeFelippis, L. A. Alter, A. H. Pekar, H. A. Havel, and D. N. Brems. Evidence for a self-associating equilibrium intermediate during folding of human growth hormone. Biochemistry 32:1555–1562 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. B. Bam, J. L. Cleland, and T. W. Randolph. Molten globule intermediate of recombinant human growth hormone: Stabilization with surfactants. Biotechnol. Prog. 12:801–809 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. B. Bam, J. L. Cleland, J. Yang, M. C. Manning, J. F. Carpenter, R. F. Kelley, and T. W. Randolph. Tween protects recombinant human growth hormone agitation-induced damage via hydrophobic interactions. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:1554–1559 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. V. Sluzky, J. A. Tamada, A. M. Klibanov, and R. Langer. Kinetics of insulin aggregation in aqueous solutions upon agitation in the presence of hydrophobic surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 88:9377–9381 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. Sluzky, A. M. Klibanov, and R. Langer. Mechanism of Insulin aggregation and stabilization in agitated aqueous solutions. Biotechnol. Bioengin. 40:895–903 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutics, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 91320

    Michael J. Treuheit, Andrew A. Kosky & David N. Brems

Authors
  1. Michael J. Treuheit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew A. Kosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David N. Brems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David N. Brems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treuheit, M.J., Kosky, A.A. & Brems, D.N. Inverse Relationship of Protein Concentration and Aggregation. Pharm Res 19, 511–516 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015108115452

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015108115452

Search

Navigation