Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S.

Small Business Economics volume 18, pages 13–40 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper provides a conceptual and empirical account of the dynamic role of SMEs in the U.S. economy. Evidence is provided to show that SMEs are important sources of employment growth and innovation. For example, the net employment gain during 1990–95 is shown to be greater among smaller firms than among larger firms. Furthermore, while large firms often produce a larger number of patents per firm, the patenting rate for small firms is typically higher than that for large firms when measured on a per-employee basis. It is noted that public policy is shifting away from traditional measures which were based on a static conception of industrial organization and thus emphasized anti-trust, regulation and public ownership solutions, towards measures which are geared towards supporting the dynamic role of SMEs. These measures focus on providing an enabling environment for enterprise start-ups, job creation, knowledge spillovers and technological change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and Catherine Armington, 1998, ‘Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) Documentation’, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, Discussion Paper, 98-9 July 1998.

  • Acs, Zoltan J., Catherine Armington and Alicia Robb, 1999, ‘Measures of Job Flow Dynamics in the U.S.’, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, Discussion Paper 99-1 January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 69(4), 567-575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and David B. Audretsch, 1998, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78(4), 678-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman, 1992, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 82(1), 363-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, 1997, ‘The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation’, Small Business Economics 9(1), 21-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1962, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1991, ‘New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’, Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3), 441-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86(3), 630-640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Talat Mahmood, 1995, ‘New-Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 97-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Paula E. Stephan, 1996, ‘Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’, American Economic Review 86(3), 641-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Hideki Yamawaki (eds.), 1991, Structure, Conduct and Performance: Leonard Weiss, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baily, Martin Neil, Eric J. Bartelsman and John Haltiwanger, 1996, ‘Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?’ Small Business Economics 8(4), 259-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R., 1995, The Dynamics of Industrial Competition, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R. and Paul K. Gorecki, 1991, ‘Entry, Exit, and Production Growth’, Iin P. Geroski and J. Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R. and M. Rafiquzzaman, 1995, ‘Selection Versus Evolutionary Adaptation: Learning and Post-Entry Performance’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 501-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W. L. and J. T. Scott, 1987, Market Structure and Technological Change, New York: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles, James Hamilton and James Medoff, 1990, Employers Large and Small, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., 1998, ‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’, Journal of Economic Literature 36(4), 1947-1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H., 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica 4(4), 386-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and S. Klepper, 1991, ‘Firm Size Versus Diversity in the Achievement of Technological Advance’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and S. Klepper, 1992, ‘The Tradeoff Between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’, Small Business Economics 4(1), 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger and Scott Schuh, 1996a, Job Creation and Destruction, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger and Scott Schuh, 1996b, ‘Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts’, Small Business Economics 8(4), 297-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, Michael L., Richard K. Lester, Robert M. Solow and the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity, 1989, Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’, Research Policy 13(1), 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988, ‘Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature 26(3), 112-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 671-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., 1994a, ‘Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 363-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., 1994b, The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Maryann P. and David B. Audretsch, 1999, ‘Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition’, European Economic Review 43, 409-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin, 1997, ‘Federal and State Government Roles in Science and Technology’, Economic Development Quarterly 11(4), 283-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1956, American Capitalism, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1991, ‘Some Data-Driven Reflections on the Entry Process’, in Paul Georski and Joachin Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1995, ‘What Do We Know About Entry’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 421-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.), 1991, Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman and A. Shleifer, 1992, ‘Growth of Cities’, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126-1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi, 1979, ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics 10(Spring), 92-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., 1987, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35(June), 583-605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman, 1989, Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O., 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., 1969, The Economy of Cities, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., 1989, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R., 1993, ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, 1982, ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’, Econometrica 50(2), 649-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul, 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, 1987, Appropriating the Returns From Industrial Research and Development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Washington, D.C., pp. 783-820.

  • Malecki, E. J., 1996, Technology and Economic Development, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin, 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms’, American Economic Review 52(5), 1023-1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, Jose, 1994, ‘Firm Growth During Infancy’, Small Business Economics 6(1), 27-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. and P. Portugal, 1994, ‘Life Duration of New Firms’, Journal of Industrial Economics 27(3), 227-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, Jose, Pedro Portugal and Paulo Guimaraes, 1995, ‘The Survival of New Plants: Start-Up Conditions and Post-Entry Evolution’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4), 459-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Manfred, 1993, ‘Review of Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 11(4), 593-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., 1990, The Comparative Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, C. F., 1971, Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industry, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevenzer, M., 1997, ‘The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering in Biotechnology’, Small Business Economics 9(3), 255-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1990, ‘Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley’, California Management Review 33, 89-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee, 1994, Regional Advantage, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1973, ‘The Determinants of Industry Plant Sizes in Six Nations’, Review of Economics and Statistics 55(2), 135-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1991, ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Rolf, 1996, ‘Technology Policies and the Growth of Regions’, Small Business Economics 8(2), 75-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John, 1997, ‘Gibrat's Legacy’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(1), 40-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester C., 1985, ‘Healing with a Thousand Bandages’, Challenge 28, 19-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, Laura, Tea Petrin and Halsey Rogers, 1994, ‘Promoting Entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 165-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim, 1992, ‘Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat's Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989’, Small Business Economics 4(2), 125-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Joachim, 1994, ‘Small Firm Entry in Manufacturing Industries: Lower Saxony, 1979–1989’, Small Business Economics 6(3), 211-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W., 1964, ‘The Survival Technique and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity’, Journal of Political Economy 72(3), 246-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W., 1976, ‘Optimal Plant Scale and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity’, in R. T. Masson and P. D. Qualls (eds.), Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard W., 1979, ‘The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127, 1104-1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G., 1984, ‘Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 287-320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ameritech Chair of Economic Development, Institute of Development Strategies, Indiana University, SPEA, Suite 201, Bloomington, IN, 47405-2100, U.S.A

    David B. Audretsch

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audretsch, D.B. The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S.. Small Business Economics 18, 13–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015105222884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015105222884

Keywords

search

Navigation