Skip to main content

Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characteristics in chickpea core collection

Abstract

The chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) core collection consists of 1956accessions, of which 1465 are desi, 433 kabuli, and 58 intermediate types. This core collection was evaluated for 7 morphological descriptors and 15agronomic characteristics to estimate phenotypic diversity. All the three groups differed significantly for flower colour, plant colour, dots on seed testa, seed testa texture, plant width, days to maturity, pods per plant,100-seed weight and plot yield. The kabuli and intermediate types were not significantly different for growth habit and seed colour, they differed,however, significantly from desi types for both traits. Desi, kabuli, and intermediate types were significantly different for plant width, days to maturity, pods per plant, 100-seed weight, and plot yield. Kabuli plants have broad plant width, matured late, have lowest average number of pods,highest 100-seed weight, and lowest plot yield. There were significant phenotypic correlations among the various characteristics. Two of these,between days to 50% flowering and flowering duration and between pod number and plant yield, explained 50% variation in the other trait in all three groups. Principal component analysis showed that days to 50%flowering, plant width, apical secondary branches, tertiary branches, dots on seed testa, 100-seed weight, flowering duration, basal secondary branches, seed colour, and seed testa texture were important traits in explaining multivariate polymorphism. Growth habit and basal primary branches did not significantly account for variation in the first five principal components of desi, kabuli, and intermediate types as well as for the entire core collection, indicating their low importance as chickpea descriptors. The average phenotypic diversity index was highest in the intermediate types(0.2653) and lowest in the kabuli types (0.1490). The Shannon-Weaver diversity index varied among traits between the three groups, and the diversity within a group depended upon the traits recorded.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Frankel, O.H. & E. Bennett, 1970. Genetic Resources in Plants - Their exploration and conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O.H. & M.E. Soule, 1981. Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBPGR, ICRISAT & ICARDA, 1993. Descriptors for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India and International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M.A., P.W. Skroch, J. Nienhuis, P. Hinrichsen, G. Bascur & C. Munoz-Schick, 1997. Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data. Crop Sci 37: 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuls, M., 1952. The use of the 'studentized range’ in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H., 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honour of Harold Hotelling, pp. 278–292. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun, S., A. Gopher & S. Abbo, 2000. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288: 1602–1603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., 1939. The distribuation of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31: 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. & W. Weaver, 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D.Z., G.R. Bauchan, G. Auricht & S. Hughes, 1999. A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Sci 39: 1237–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya, H.D. & R. Ortiz, 2001. A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 102: 1292–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya, H.D., P.J. Bramel & S. Singh, 2001. Development of a chickpea core subset using geographic distribution and quantitative traits. Crop Sci 41: 206–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maesen, L.J.G., 1987. Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: M.C. Saxena & K.B. Singh (Eds.), The Chickpea, pp. 11–34. C.A.B. International Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N.I., 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Leningrad. pp. 129-238.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upadhyaya, H.D., Ortiz, R., Bramel, P.J. et al. Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characteristics in chickpea core collection. Euphytica 123, 333–342 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015088417487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015088417487

  • chickpea
  • Cicer arietinum
  • core collection
  • descriptors
  • descriptor states
  • phenotypic diversity
  • principal components
  • statistics