Skip to main content
Log in

Rational Error Correction

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under general conditions, linear decision rules of agents with rational expectations are equivalent to restricted error corrections. However, empirical rejections of rational expectation restrictions are the rule, rather than the exception, in macroeconomics. Rejections often are conditioned on the assumption that agents aim to smooth only the levels of actions or are subject to geometric random delays. Generalizations of dynamic frictions on agent activities are suggested that yield closed-form, higher-order decision rules with improved statistical fits and infrequent rejections of rational expectations restrictions. Properties of these generalized `rational' error corrections are illustrated for producer pricing in manufacturing industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. and Moore. G. (1985). A linear algebraic procedure for solving linear perfect foresight models. Economic Letters, 17, 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., Hansen, L., McGrattan, E. and Sargent, T. (1996). Mechanics of forming and estimating dynamic linear economics. In H. Amman, D. Kendrick and J. Rust (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics I, 171–252. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (1987). Aggregate and individual price adjustment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 57–109.

  • Board, R. and Tinsley, P. (1996). Smart systems and simple agents. In M. Gilli (ed.), Computational Economic Systems, 51–79. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Cassino, V., Drew, A., Hansen, E., Hunt, B., Rose, D. and Scott, A. (1997). The forecasting and policy system: the core model. Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Research Paper No. 43, August.

  • Brayton, F. and Tinsley, P. (1996). A guide to FRB/US: a macroeconomic model of the United States. Federal Reserve Board, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1996-42.

  • Brayton, F., Mauskopf, E., Reifschneider, D., Tinsley, P. and Williams, J. (1997). The role of expectations in the FRB/US macroeconomic model. Federal Reserve Bulletin, April, 227-45.

  • Bryant, R., Hooper, P. and Mann, C. (eds.) (1993). Empirical evaluation of alternative policy regimes. The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis (1991). The 1982 Benchmark Input-Output Accounts of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen, T., Hall, S. and Henry, S. (1990). Manufacturing stocks: expectations, risk and co-integration. Economic Journal, 100, September, 756–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D. (1986). The rigidity of prices. American Economic Review, September, 637–658.

  • Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Evans, C. (1994). Identification and the effects of monetary policy shocks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper 94-7, May.

  • Cuthbertson, K. and Gasparro, D. (1983). The determinants of manufacturing inventories in the UK. Economic Journal, 103, November, 1479–1492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, N. and Hendry, D. (1991). Modeling the demand for narrow money in the United Kingdom and the United States. European Economic Review, 35, May, 833–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, N. and Irons, J. (1995). The Lucas critique in practice: theory without measurement. In K. Hoover (ed.), Macroeconometrics: Developments, Tensions, and Prospects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1936). On the notion of equilibrium and disequilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, III, February, 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (2000). Inflation dynamics: a structural econometric analysis. NBERWorking Paper W755 1, February.

  • Hairault, J. and Portier, F. (1993). Money, new-Keynesian macroeconomics and the business cycle. European Economic Review, 37, December, 1533–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S, Henry, S. and Wren-Lewis, S. (1986). Manufacturing stocks and forward-looking expectations in the UK. Economica, 53, November, 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. and Sargent, T. (1980). Formulating and estimating dynamic linear rational expectations models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, February, 7–46.

  • Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1991). The econometrics of the general equilibrium approach to business cycles. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93(2), 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A. (1991). The macroeconomic significance of nominal wage contract duration. University of California at San Diego Discussion Paper 91-08, February.

  • Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. In K. Brunner and A. Meltzer (eds.), The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1, 19–46.

  • MacKinnon, J. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. In R. Engle and C. Granger (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships, 267–276. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. and Topel, R. (1985). Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business Economics and Statistics, 3, October, 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1985). Error correction, partial adjustment and all that: an expository note. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloz, S., Rose, D. and Tetlow, R. (1994). The Bank of Canada's new quarterly projection model (QPM): an introduction. Bank of Canada Review, Autumn, 23–38.

  • Raddock, R. (1985). Revised Federal Reserve rates of capacity utilization. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 71, October, 754–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. (1982). Sticky prices in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), December, 1187–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. and Saloner, G. (1986). A supergame-theoretic model of price wars during booms. American Economic Review 76(3), June, 390–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. (1996). Prices, output, and hours: an empirical analysis based on a sticky price model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(3), June, 505–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. and Woodford, M. (1998). An optimization-based econometric framework for the evaluation of monetary policy: expanded version. NBER Working Paper T0233, May.

  • Sargent, T. (1993). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1992). Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts. European Economic Review, 36(5), June, 975–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, P. and Tinsley, P. (1980). Linear prediction and estimation methods for regression models with stationary stochastic coefficients. Journal of Econometrics, 12, 103–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1998). Staggered price and wage setting in macroeconomics. NBERWorking Paper 6754, October.

  • Tinsley, P. (1970). On ramps, turnpikes, and distributed lag approximations of optimal intertemporal adjustment. Western Economic Journal, December, 397–411.

  • Tinsley, P. (1971). A variable adjustment model of labor demand. International Economic Review, 12, October, 482–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, P. (1993). Fitting both data and theories: polynomial adjustment costs and error correction decision rules. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1993-21, Federal Reserve Board.

  • Watson, M. (1994). Vector autoregressions and cointegration. In R. Engle and D. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, IV, 2843–2915. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1994). Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tinsley, P. Rational Error Correction. Computational Economics 19, 197–225 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015056028963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015056028963

Navigation