Skip to main content

A Cross-Modality Perspective On Verb Agreement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory volume 20, pages 413–450 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Verb agreement in sign languages (illustrated here by Israeli Sign Language, ISL) seems to differ greatly from that of spoken languages, as it seems to be thematically oriented and is realized morphologically only on a subset of verbs in the language. These properties present both typological and theoretical challenges, since agreement is generally regarded as a structural relation, realized morphologically as inflectional affixes on the verbal element. These challenges are addressed here by applying aparticular componential analysis (along the lines of Jackendoff 1990) to the class of verbs which inflect for agreement in ISL. This analysis enables us to capture and explain the similarities as well as differences between the agreement systems of signed and spoken languages. It argues that agreement is basically a structural relation in languages in both modalities. The unique properties of sign language verb agreement are attributed to the difference in the agreeing element: verbs and auxiliaries in spoken languages vs. a spatial predicate in sign languages. These conclusions have some significant theoretical implications, both for capturingaspects of the interaction between modality and the structure of language, andfor imposing restrictions on the structure of the lexicon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

REFERENCES

  • Aarons, Debra, Ben Bahan, Judy Kegl, and Carol Neidle. 1992. 'Clausal Structure and a Tier for Grammatical Marking in American Sign Language', Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15, 103-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, and Wendy Sandler. 2000. 'Universal and Particular Aspects of Sign Language Morphology', University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 1-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahan, Ben. 1996. Non-manual Realization of Agreement in American Sign Language, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.

  • Baker, Mark. 1992. 'Thematic Conditions on Syntactic Structures: Evidence from Locative Applicatives', in I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Foris, Berlin, pp. 23-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, Michael and Charles Ferguson (eds.). 1988. Agreement in Natural Language, CSLI, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1992. 'Morphology, Semantics and Argument Structure', in I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Foris, Berlin, pp. 47-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1993. 'Against Split Morphology', Yearbook of Morphology 27-49.

  • Bos, Heleen. 1993. 'Agreement and Prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands', in F. Drijkoningen and K. Hengeveld (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 37-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Heleen. 1995. 'Pronoun Copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands', in H. Bos and T. Schermer (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, September 1-3, 1994, Signum, Hamburg, pp. 121-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Heleen. 1998. 'An Analysis of Main Verb Agreement and Auxiliary Agreement in SLN from the Perspective of the Theory of Conceptual Semantics', talk presented at the Sixth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Linguistics, Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentari, Diane. 1999. A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1993. 'The Theory of Principles and Parameters', in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 506-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, William. 1988. 'Agreement vs. Case Marking and Direct Objects', in Michael Barlow and Charles Ferguson (eds.), pp. 159-179.

  • Deuchar, Margaret. 1984. British Sign Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit. 1988. 'On the Complementarity of Subject and Subject-Verb Agreement', in Michael Barlow and Charles Ferguson (eds.), pp. 201-218.

  • Dryer, Matthew. 1986. 'Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative', Language 62, 808-845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmorey, Karen. 1995. 'Processing the Dynamic Visual-Spatial Morphology of Signed Languages', in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 29-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmorey, Karen. In press. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

  • Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language, Signum, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Susan D. 1996. 'The Role of Auxiliaries in Sign Language', Lingua 98, 103-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Susan D. and Bonnie Gough. 1978. 'Verbs in American Sign Language', Sign Language Studies 18, 17-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Susan D. and Patricia Siple (eds.). 1990. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lynn A. 1975. 'Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign Language', Language 51, 940-961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, James P. and Judy A. Kegl. 1982. 'Semantic Perspicuity and the Locative Hypothesis', Journal of Education 164, 185-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, James P. and Wendy Goodhart. 1988. 'American Sign Language and the Human Biological Capacity for Language', in M. Strong (ed.), Language Learning and Deafness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück, Susanne and Roland Pfau. 1999. 'A Distributed Morphology Account of Verbal Inflection in German Sign Language', in Tina Cambier, Anikó Lipták, Michael Redford and Erik Jan van der Torre (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE 7, SOLE, Leiden, pp. 65-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Jeffrey. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland Linguistic Series 25, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung and Lisa Travis. 1992. 'SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages,' NLLT 10, 375-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulst, Harry G. van der. 1993. 'Units in the Analysis of Signs', Phonology 10(2), 209-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. 'The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory', Linguistic Inquiry 18, 369-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. 'The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out, Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quantification in English', NLLT 14, 305-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, Wynne D. 1992. Morphosyntax of ASL Verb Phrase, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.

  • Johnston, Trevor. 1991. 'Spatial Syntax and Spatial Semantics in the Inflection of Signs for theMarking of Person and Location in Auslan', International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2(1), 29-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, Ed S. and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, Jim G. and Bencie Woll. 1985. Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Christian. 1988. 'On the Function of Agreement', in Michael Barlow and Charles Ferguson (eds.), pp. 55-65.

  • Liddell, Scott K. 2000. 'Indicating Verbs and Pronouns: Pointing Away from Agreement', in K. Emmorey and H. Lane (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 303-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillo-Martin, Diane and Ed Klima. 1990. 'Pointing Out Differences: ASL Pronouns in Syntactic Theory', in Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple (eds.), pp. 191-210.

  • Marsack, C. C. 1980. Samoan, Teach Yourself Books, Hodder and Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James and Kenneth Hale. 1984. 'On the Syntax of Person-Number Agreement in Modern Irish', NLLT 1, 487-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, Patrick. 1996. Verb Categories in Irish Sign Language, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Richard. 1990. 'Person Deixis in American Sign Language', in Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple (eds.), pp. 175-190.

  • Meir, Irit. 1995. 'Explaining Backwards Verbs in ISL: Syntactic-Semantic Interaction', in H. Bos and T. Schermer (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, September 1-3, 1994, Signum, Hamburg, pp. 105-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, Irit. 1998a. 'Syntactic-Semantic Interaction in Israeli Sign Language Verbs: The Case of Backwards Verbs', Sign Language and Linguistics 1, 3-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, Irit. 1998b. Thematic Structure and Verb Agreement in Israeli Sign Language, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

  • Meir, Irit. 2001a. 'Verb Classifiers as Noun Incorporation in Israeli Sign Language', Yearbook of Morphology 1999, 299-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, Irit. 2001b. 'Motion and Transfer: The Analysis of Two Verb Classes in Israeli Sign Language', in Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub, and Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 74-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun, Marianne. 1991. 'Active/agentive Case Marking and Its Motivation', Language 67, 510-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movshon, Anthony. 1990. 'Visual Processing of Moving Images', in Horace Barlow, Colin Blakemore and Miranda Weston-Smith (eds.), Images and Understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 122-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, Elisa and Ted Supalla. 2000. 'Sign Language Research at the Millennium', in K. Emmorey and H. Lane (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 103-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Johanna. 1986. 'Head-marking and Dependent-marking Grammar', Language 62, 56-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Published version [1988], Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padden, Carol. 1990. 'The Relation between Space and Grammar in ASL Verb Morphology', in C. Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research, Theoretical Issues, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 118-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzuto, Elena and Serena Corazza. 1996. 'Noun Morphology in Italian Sign Language', Lingua 98, 169-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzuto, Elena, Enza Giuranna, and Guiseppe Gambino. 1990. 'Manual and Nonmanual Morphology in Italian Sign Language: Grammatical Constraints and Discourse Processes', in C. Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research, Theoretical Issues, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 83-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin. 1988. 'What to Do with Theta Roles', in W. Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 7-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sara T. 1989. Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.

  • Saeed, John and Lorraine Leeson. 1999. 'Detransivisation in Irish Sign Language', a paper presented at the ESF Intersign Workshop on Morphosyntax, Siena, Italy.

  • Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in ASL Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Wendy. 1993. 'Sign Language and Modularity', Lingua 89, 315-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Wendy and Diane Lillo-Martin. 2001. 'Natural Sign Languages', in M. Aronoff and J. Rees-Miller (eds.), Handbook of Linguistics, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 533-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Brenda. 1990. 'Classifier Predicates in American Sign Language', International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1, 15-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard-Kegl, Judy A. 1985. Locative Relations in American Sign Language Word Formation, Syntax and Discourse, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Smith, Wayne H. 1990. 'Evidence for Auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language', in Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple (eds.), pp. 211-228.

  • Talmy, Leonard. 1985 [1988]. 'Force Dynamics in Language and Thought', Cognitive Science 12, 49-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, Sarah F. 1997. Language in the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyechi, Linda A. 1994. The Geometry of Visual Phonology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Van Valin, Robert D. and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Margaret and Karen Emmorey. 2000. 'When Does Modality Matter? Evidence from ASL on the Nature of Working Memory', in K. Emmorey and H. Lane (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 135-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Dieter. 1994. 'Towards a Lexicon-based Theory of Agreement', Theoretical Linguistics 20, 1-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. 'Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive', NLLT 3, 441-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hebrew Language and the Laboratory for Sign Language, Linguistics and Cognition Research The, University of Haifa Mount Carmel, Haifa, 31905, Israel

    Irit Meir

Authors
  1. Irit Meir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meir, I. A Cross-Modality Perspective On Verb Agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 413–450 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015041113514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015041113514

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Unique Property
  • Structural Relation
  • Sign Language
  • Theoretical Implication