Skip to main content
Log in

Winter Feeding Tree Choice in Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellanae) in Shennongjia Nature Reserve, China

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated patterns of winter feeding tree choice in 4 groups of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellanae) in Shennongjia Nature Reserve, China. We collected data during 2 winters from 1998 to 2000. The monkeys used mature forest, young forest and shrub forest, but not grassland. Groups used tree species in a significantly nonrandom pattern. There was a similar composition of preferred tree species between different habitats for each group and among the same habitat types for different groups. They preferred Abies fargesii, Pinus armandii and Salix walliciana for foraging. The 3 species occur in varying degrees of abundance in different habitats and were used differently by the 4 groups. The difference is probably due to interhabitat differences in availability of tree species, in addition to microclimate. The mean circumference of a tree had little effect on its preference score, but preferred species tend to be larger. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated that the percentage of trees used and average number of feeding bites per tree is significantly greater for larger trees. For all trees in a given habitat, the percentage of trees used and average number of bites per tree have a significant positive correlation with average tree circumference. Our results indicate that Rhinopithecus roxellanae prefer to feed in large trees more than small trees in a given habitat, thereby preferring mature forest habitat. There is also a group-size effect; larger groups used higher-quality habitats than those of smaller groups. Both tree species and size are the major determinants of feeding choice, but tree species is more important than tree size. Our results have at least three implications for winter habitat conservation of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys. Conservation efforts should be focused on mature forest because it is better habitat at Rhinopithecus than young forest, as long as the same tree species are present. Secondly, Pinus armandii, Abies fargesii and Salix walliciana should be conserved as top priority in forest communities. Third, the largest trees in each habitat should be given greatest possible protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brown, A.D., and Zunino, G.E. (1990). Dietary variability in Cebus appella in extreme habitats: Evidence for adaptability. Folia Primatologica 54: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. (1987). Flexibility in diets of three species of Costa Rican primates. Folia Primatologica 49: 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A. (1990). Ecological constraints on group size in three species of Neotropical primates. Folia Primatologica 55: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A., White, F. J., and Wrangham, R. W. (1994). Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos. In McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Heltne, P. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui, J. S. (1996). Annals of Shennongjia (in Chinese), Hubei Science and Technology Press, Wuhan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. M., Peres, C. A., and Pinder, L. (1997). Foraging ecology and use of space in wild gold lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). Am. J. Primatol. 41: 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, S. P., Holloway, G. L., Watts, E. J., and Lawrence, P. S. (1999). Characteristics of foraging trees selected by pileated woodpeckers in New Brunswick. J. Wildlife Manag. 63(2): 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, C. M. (1975). Ecology, diet and social patterns in Old andNewWorld primates. In Tuttle, R. H. (ed.), Socioecology and Psychology of Primates, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. C. (1998). Rhinopithecus roxellanae. In Wang, S. (ed), China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Mammalia, Science Press, Beijing, pp. 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, S. H. (1992). Dendrology (in Chinese), China Forestry Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C. H., and Goldsmith, M. L. (1995). Predicting group size in primates: Foraging costs and predation risks. Behav. Ecol. 6: 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, R. C., Gu, H. J., and Zhou, X. P. (1999). A preliminary report on Sichuan snubnosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) at Baihe Nature Reserve. Folia Primatologica 70: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1999). Ecological Methodology, Addison-Wesley, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. G., Ren, B. P., and Gao, T. F. (1999). A change in the summer home range of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys in Yuhuangmiao, Qinling Mountains. Folia Primatologica 70: 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. H., and Shi, D. C. (1986). Food of golden monkey (in Chinese). Chinese La Animala Mondo 3: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. M. (2001).The seasonal diet of the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in Shennongjia Nature Reserve, China. Folia Primatologica 72: 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., and Zhang, S. Y. (1998). Hand preference in food researching in Sichuan golden monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Acta Theriologica Sinica 18(2): 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, J. M. (1972). Baboon feeding on Euphorbia candelabrum. E. Afr. Wildlife J. 10: 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., and Thomas, D. L. (1993). Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C.W. (1986). A resurvey of Tana primates and their forest habitat. Primate Conserv. 7: 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, N. (1990). Choice of food patches by Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata). Am. J. Primatol. 21: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, G. W., Rhine, R. J., Wynn, G. W., and Wynn, R. D. (1987). Baboon diet: A five-year study of stability and variability in the plant feeding and habitat of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Folia Primatologica 48: 78–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D. J. (1996). Ecological correlates to activity and habitat use of two prosimian primates: Eulemur rubriventer and Eulemur fulvus. rufus in Madagascar. Am. J. Primatol. 40: 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M. (1993). The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landsc. Ecol. 8(1): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, C. J. (1994). Dendrology (in Chinese), China Forestry Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remis, M. J. (1997). Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorrilla) as seasonal frugivores: Use of variable resources. Am. J. Primatol. 43: 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Inc. (1993). User's guide, SAS Institute.

  • Shi, D. C., Li, G. H., and Hu, T. Q. (1982). Preliminary studies on the ecology of golden-haired monkey (in Chinese). Chin. Zool. Res. 3(2): 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, C. B. (1991). Behavioral ecology of the capped langur in Bangladesh: Reproductive tactics in one-male groups. Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 26, Karger, Basel.

  • Stanford, C. B. (1998). Chimpanzee and Red Colobus: The Ecology of Predator and Prey, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, D., and Torris, W. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics With References of Biological Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, P. R., Quinones, M. J., and Athumada, J. A. (1994). Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Am. J. Primatol. 32: 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (1991). Diet in one group of woolly spider monkeys, or muriquis (Brachteles arachnoides arachnoides). Am. J. Primatol. 23: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J., and Janson, C. H., (1986). The socioecology of primate group. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 17: 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P. (1991). Strategies of habitat use by mountain gorillas. Folia Primatologica 56: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. (1989). The Ecology of Bird Communities, Vol. 2: Processes and Variations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. S., and Marshall, W. H. (1938). Duck nesting studies, Bear River Bird Refuge, Utah, 1937. J. Wildlife Manag. 2: 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuhan Institute of Botany. (1980). Shennongjia Plants (in Chinese), Hubei People Press, Hubei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. Y., Ren, B. P., and Li, B. G. (1999). A juvenile Sichuan gold monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellanae) predated by a goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) in the Qinling Mountains. Folia Primatologica 70: 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z. Q. (1992). Status and conservation of snub-nosed monkey at Shennongjia Nature Reserve (in Chinese). Chin. Wildlife 67: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, S. M., and Walters, J. R. (1999). Selection of pine for foraging by red-cockaded woodpeckers. J. Wildlife Manag. 63: 843–852.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yiming, L., Stanford, C.B. & Yuhui, Y. Winter Feeding Tree Choice in Sichuan Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellanae) in Shennongjia Nature Reserve, China. International Journal of Primatology 23, 657–675 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014981919762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014981919762

Navigation