Abstract
The argument that the provocation defence is adeeply sexed excuse for murder and should beabolished is often dismissed as polemical. Thisarticle challenges this subordinating strategyfavoured by the law of provocation's apologistsand continues to make the case againstprovocation. Drawing on a range of theoreticalapproaches to questions related to polemic,anger, and ethics, it strives to valorisefeminist and queer anger about provocation'svictim-blaming narratives, while remainingcognisant of poststructuralistproblematisations of both law and law reform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allen, H., “One Law For all Reasonable Persons?”, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 16 (1988), 419–432.
Bauman, Z., Intimations of the Postmodern Condition (London: Routledge, 1992).
Bolger, A., Aboriginal Women and Violence (Darwin: Australian National University North Australia Research Unit, 1991).
Boyle, C., “The Role of Equality in Criminal Law”, Saskatchewan Law Review 58 (1994), 203–216.
Boyle, C., “Provocation: The Sensitive, New Age, Ordinary Person”, in The Law of Homicide, Provocation and Self-Defence: Canadian, Australian and Other Asia-Pacific Perspectives, eds. G. Ferguson & S. Yeo (Victoria B.C.: Centre for Asia-Pacific Studies, 2000), 75–84.
Brown, H., “Provocation as a Defence to Murder: To Abolish or to Reform?”, Australian Feminist Law Journal 12 (1999), 137–141.
Carcach, C. & Grant A., “Imprisonment Trends in Australia: Trends in Prison Populations & Imprisonment Rates, 1982–1998”, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 130 (1999), 1–6.
Cavarero, A., Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood (London: Routledge, 2000).
Coker, D.K., “Heat of Passion and Wife Killing: Men Who Batter/Men Who Kill”, Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies 2 (1992), 71–130.
Comstock, G., “Dismantling the Homosexual Panic Defence”, Law and Sexuality 2 (1992), 81–102.
Cornell, D., Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction, and the Law (New York: Routledge, 1991).
Coss, G., “Editorial: Lethal Violence by Men”, Criminal Law Journal 20 (1996), 305–309.
Coss, G., “Revisiting Lethal Violence by Men”, Criminal Law Journal 22 (1998a), 5–9.
Coss, G., “A Reply to Tom Molomby”, Criminal Law Journal 22 (1998b), 119–121.
Edwards, S.M., “Provoking Their Own Demise: From Common Assault to Homicide”, in Women, Violence and Social Control, eds. J. Hanmer & M. Maynard (London: Macmillan, 1987), 152–168.
Foucault, M., “Polemics, Politics and Problematisations”, in The Foucault Reader, ed. P. Rabinow (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984), 381–390.
Hannan, L., “Satan on Trial for 2 Murders”, The Sun-Herald (July 30, 2000).
Hodge, N., “Transgressive Sexuality and the Homosexual Advance”, Alternative Law Journal 23 (1997), 30–34.
Horder, J., Provocation and Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).
Howe, A., Punish and Critique: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Penality (London: Routledge, 1994a).
Howe, A., “Provoking Comment: The Question of Gender Bias in the Provocation Defence – A Victorian Case Study”, in Australian Women: New Feminist Perspectives, eds. N. Grieve & A. Burns (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994b), 88–103.
Howe, A., “More Folk Provoke Their Own Demise (Revisiting the Provocation Defence Debate Courtesy of the Homosexual Advance Defence)”, Sydney Law Review 19 (1997), 366–384.
Howe, A., “The Provocation Defence – Finally Provoking its Own Demise?”, Melbourne University Law Review 22 (1998), 466–490.
Howe, A., “Reforming Provocation (More or Less)”, Australian Feminist Law Journal 12 (1999), 127–136.
Howe, A., “Homosexual Advances in Law: Murderous Excuse, Pluralised Ignorance and the Privilege of Unknowing”, in Sexuality in the Legal Arena, eds. D. Herman & C. Sychin (London: Athlone, 2000), 84–99.
Johnston, P., “'More Than Ordinary Men Gone Wrong': Can the Law Know the Gay Subject?”, Melbourne University Law Review 20 (1996), 1152–1191.
Johnstone, H., “Six Years for Killer of 'Nagging' Wife”, London Times (29 October, 1999).
Kahan, D.M. & Nussbaum, M.C., “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law”, Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), 269–374.
Leader-Elliot, I., “Sex, Race and Provocation – In Defence of Stingel”, Criminal Law Journal 20 (1996), 65–96.
Lees, S., “Lawyers' Work as Constitutive of Gender Relations”, in Lawyers in a Postmodern World, eds. M. Cain & C. Harrington (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994), 124–154.
Marr, D., The High Price of Heaven (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1999).
Model Criminal Code Officers Committee, Discussion Paper Model Criminal Code: Chapter Five: Fatal Offences Against the Person (Canberra: M.C.C.O.C., 1998).
Molomby, T., “Revisiting Lethal Violence by Men – A Reply”, Criminal Law Journal 22 (1998), 116–118.
Mooney, J., Gender, Violence and the Social Order (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000).
Morgan, J., “Provocation Law and Facts: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Tales are Told About Them”, Melbourne University Law Review 21 (1997), 237–276.
Munro, T., “Open Letter to the Federation of Community Legal Centres in Victoria: Re Gay and Lesbian Working Group Submission to M.C.C.O.C.” (25 August, 1988).
Neal, D., “In Defence of Provocation”, The Age (1 December, 1998).
Neave, M., “At Law, Even Killers Deserve Compassion”, The Age (17 December, 1998).
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Partial Defences to Murder: Provocation and Infanticide, Report 83 (Sydney: N.S.W.L.R.C., 1997).
Nourse, V., “Passion's Progress: Modern Law Reform and the Provocation Defence”, Yale Law Journal 106 (1997), 1331–1443.
Povinelli, E., “The State of Shame: Australian Multiculturalism and the Crisis of Indigenous Citizenship”, Critical Inquiry Winter (1998), 575–610.
Razack, S., “What is to be Gained by Looking White People in the Eye? Culture, Race and Gender in Cases of Sexual Violence”, Signs 19 (1994), 894–923.
Reilly, A., “Loss of Self-control in Provocation”, Criminal Law Journal 21 (1997), 320–335.
Scutt, J., “Why Must Women Suffer Further Under the Law?”, The Age (3 December 1998).
Smart, C., Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989).
Smart, C., “Feminist Approaches to Criminology: Or Postmodern Woman Meets Atavistic Man”, in Feminist Perspectives in Criminology, eds. L. Gelsthorpe & A. Morris (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990), 70–84.
Smart, C., Law, Crime and Sexuality (London: Sage, 1995).
Spelman, E.V., “Anger and Insubordination”, in Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, eds. A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989), 263–273.
Spivak, G., “Can the Subaltern Speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds. C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 271–313.
Strang, H., Homicides in Australia 1990–1991 (Canberra: Australia Institute of Criminology, 1993).
Tarrant, S., “Something is Pushing them to the Side of Their Own Lives: A Feminist Critique of Law and Laws”, Western Australia Law Review 20 (1990), 573–606.
Tolmie, J., “Provocation or Self-Defence for Battered Women Who Kill?”, in Partial Excuses for Murder, ed. S. Yeo (Sydney: Federation Press, 1991), 61–79.
Tomsen, S. and Allen G., “The Criminal Justice Response to Gay Killings: Research Findings”, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 9 (1997), 56–70.
Yeo, S., “Sex, Ethnicity, Power, Self-control and Provocation Revisited”, Sydney Law Review 18 (1996), 304–322.
Villa, D., “Response to Polemic: How Not to Pursue Political Theory”, American Political Science Review 88 (1994), 431–432.
Volpp, L., “(Mis)identifying Culture: Asian Women and the 'Cultural Defence'”, Harvard Women's Law Journal 17 (1994), 57–101.
Volpp, L., “Talking 'Culture': Gender, Race, Nation and the Politics of Multiculturalism”, Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), 1573–1617.
Woods, G., “Letter: A Reply on 'Gay Killings'”, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 9 (1997), 204–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howe, A. Provoking Polemic – Provoked Killings and the Ethical Paradoxes of the Postmodern Feminist Condition. Feminist Legal Studies 10, 39–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014961313308
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014961313308