Skip to main content

On the Dagur Object Relative: Some Comparative Notes

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhatt, R. (1999) Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  2. Binnick, Robert I. (1979) Modern Mongolian: A Transformational Syntax, University of Toronto Press, Toronto/Buffalo/London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hale, Ken and Chunyan Ning (1996) “Raising in Dagur Relative Clauses,” in Brian Agbayani, Kazue Takeda and Sze-Wing Tang (eds.), UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 1, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kornfilt, Jaklin (1997) Turkish, Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krause, Cornelia (in progress) PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  6. Martin, Samuel (1961) Dagur Mongolian Grammar, Texts, and Lexicon, Uralic and Altaic Series, Volume 4, Indiana University Publications, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Travis Lisa (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  8. Zhong, Shu Chun (1963) Dawo'er Yu Jian Zhi [Brief Annals of the Dagur Language].

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hale, K. On the Dagur Object Relative: Some Comparative Notes. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 109–122 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014952628287

Download citation

Keywords

  • Comparative Note
  • Theoretical Language