Skip to main content
Log in

Trading Portfolios Electronically – An Experimental Approach

  • Published:
Netnomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on a simple axiom – investors prefer to hold diversified combinations of assets. Arguing that pooling vehicles like mutual funds offer approximate solutions, we propose a portfolio trading mechanism that allows individuals to trade diverse combinations of assets through a single order. Given the complexity of the market mechanism, we construct a prototype of this trading system and test it through a series of laboratory experiments with student subjects. We address the quality of the price discovery process, quality of allocations, and efficiency of the market mechanism. Results from a set of laboratory experiments indicate that the performance of such systems is sensitive to design aspects as well as relative experience of participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.S. Banks, J.O. Ledyard and D.P. Porter, Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: An experimental approach, Rand J. Economics 20(1) (1989) 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.E. Blume, J.J. Siegel and D. Rottenberg, Revolution on Wall Street: The Rise and Decline of the New York Stock Exchange (W.W. Norton &; Co., New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.J. Brewer and C.R. Plott, A binary conflict ascending price (BICAP) mechanism for the decentralized allocation of the right to use railroad tracks, Internat. J. Industrial Organization 14 (1996) 857-886.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bulow and J. Roberts, The simple economics of optimal auctions, J. Political Economy 97(5) (1989) 1060-1091.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Friedman and J. Rust, Preface, in: The Double Auction Market-Institutions, Theories, and Evidence, eds. D. Friedman and J. Rust (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993) pp. xv-xxv.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Friedman and J. Rust, eds., The Double Auction Market-Institutions, Theories, and Evidence (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Gjerstad and J. Dickhaut, Price formation in double auctions, Games Economic Behavior 22 (1998) 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B.R. Holmstrom and R.B.Myerson, Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information, Econometrica 51 (1983) 1799-1819.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.O. Ledyard, Coordination in shared facilities: A new methodology, J. Organizational Computing 1 (1991) 41-59.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.O. Ledyard, D. Porter and A. Rangel, Using computerized exchange systems to solve an allocation problem in project management, J. Organizational Computing 4(3) (1994) 271-296.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Madhavan, Trading mechanisms in securities markets, J. Finance 47(2) (1992) 607-641.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Finance 7(1) (1952) 77-91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.M. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments (Wiley, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.P. McAfee and J.McMillan, Analyzing the airwaves auction, J. Economic Perspectives 10(1) (1996) 159-175.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.A. McCabe, S.J. Rassenti and V.L. Smith, Designing "smart" computer-assisted markets, European J. Political Economy 5 (1989) 259-283.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.A. McCabe, S. Rassenti and V. Smith, Auction design for composite goods: The natural gas industry, J. Economic Behavior Organization 14 (1990) 127-149.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Phillips, Package trading thrives despite new competition, Global Finance 7(7) (1993) 42-47.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Plott, An updated review of industrial organization: Applications of experimental methods, in: Handbook of Industrial Organization, eds. R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Popper, The ins and outs of portfolio trading, Global Investor 78 (1994) 18-20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.J. Rassenti, V.L. Smith and R.L. Bulfin, A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation, Bell J. Economics 13(2) (1982) 402-417.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.H. Rothkopf, A. Pekec and R.M. Harstad, Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions, Managm. Sci. 44(8) (1998) 1131-1147.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Rustichini, M.A. Satterthwaite and S.R. Williams, Convergence to efficiency in a simple market with incomplete information, Econometrica 62(5) (1994) 1041-1063.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Sacks, How traditional fund managers think big to save on commissions, in: Investment Dealers Digest (1995) pp. 84-86.

  25. M. Satterthwaite and S. Williams, Preface, in: The Double Auction Market-Institutions, Theories, and Evidence, eds. D. Friedman and J. Rust (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993) pp. 99-123.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Schmerken, Global portfolio trading packages savings, Wall Street &; Technology 10(3) (1992) 42-47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.F. Sharpe, An algorithm for portfolio improvement, in: Advances in Mathematical Programming and Financial Planning, Vol. 1, eds. K.D. Lawrence, J.B. Guerard Jr. and G.R. Reeves (JAI Press, Greenwich, CO, 1987) pp. 155-169.

    Google Scholar 

  28. V.L. Smith, An experimental study of competitive market behavior, J. Political Economy 70 (1962) 111-137.

    Google Scholar 

  29. V.L. Smith, Microeconomic systems as an experimental science, Amer. Econom. Rev. 72 (1982) 923-955.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Srinivasan, Electronic trading of portfolios: A study, Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin (1999).

  31. S. Sunder, Experimental asset markets: A survey, in: The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds. J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995) pp. 445-500.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Wilson, Incentive efficiency of double auctions, Econometrica 53(5) (1985) 1101-1115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, S. Trading Portfolios Electronically – An Experimental Approach. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 4, 39–71 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014926929215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014926929215

Navigation