Abstract
Interpretive diversity is the term used by Carpendale and Chandler (1996) to refer to the fact that two individuals exposed to precisely the same stimulus may interpret it in quite different, but equally plausible, ways. An appreciation of interpretive diversity is said by Carpendale and Chandler to represent a development in understanding that is qualitatively different from that necessary to succeed on false belief tasks. A study is reported in which children with autism and children with general delay were given a battery of tasks consisting of false belief tasks and tasks designed to test for an understanding of interpretive diversity. Findings from the present study offer limited support for Carpendale and Chandler's claim that tasks which test for an understanding of interpretive diversity may be more difficult than false belief tasks. Between-group differences in the consistency and quality of responses given by participants suggest that autistic and delayed children may have differed somewhat in their approach to the tasks given.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Astington, J. W., & Olson, D. R. (1995). The cognitive revolution in children's understanding of mind. Human Development, 38, 179–189.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). Out of sight or out of mind: Another look at deception in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1141–1155.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169–184.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Goodhart, F. (1994). The “seeing-leads-toknowing” deficit in autism: The Pratt and Bryant probe. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 397–401.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bishop, D. (1989). Test for reception of grammar. Manchester, University of Manchester Press.
Bowler, D. M. (1992). “Theory of mind” in Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 607–616.
Carpendale, J. I., & Chandler, M. J. (1996). On the distinction between false belief understanding and subscribing to an interpretive theory of mind. Child Development, 67, 1686–1706.
Chandler, M. J., & Boyes, M. (1982). Social cognitive development. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 387–402). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Charman, T., & Campbell, A. (1997). Reliability of theory of mind task performance by individuals with a learning disability: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 725–730.
Darley, J. M., Glucksberg, S., & Kinchla, R. A. (1986). Psychology (3rd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
Frith, U., Happe, F., & Siddons, F. (1994). Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development, 3, 108–123.
Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder—autism. Trends in Neurosciences, 14, 433–438.
Hadwin, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Howlin, P., & Hill, K. (1996). Can we teach children with autism to understand emotions, belief, or pretence? Development and Psychopathology, 8, 345–365.
Happe, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.
Happe, F. G. E. (1994). Autism: an introduction to psychological theory. London: UCL Press.
Happe, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal-ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855.
Hurlburt, R. T., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (1994). Sampling the form of inner experience in three adults with Asperger syndrome. Psychological Medicine, 24, 385–395.
Jastrow, J. (1900). Fact and fable in psychology. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Kazak, S., Collis, G. M., & Lewis, V. (1997). Can young people with autism refer to knowledge states? Evidence from their understanding of “know” and “guess.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 1001–1009.
Leekam, S. R., & Perner, J. (1991). Does the autistic child have a metarepresentational deficit? Cognition, 40, 203–218.
Leslie, A. M., (1994). Pretending and believing—issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211–238.
Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism (pp. 83–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leslie, A. M., & Thaiss, L. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development—neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43, 225–251.
Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, R. E., Tunali, B., & Kelley, M. L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Downs-syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 9–23.
Nelson, K., Plesa, D., & Henseler, S. (1998). Children's theory of mind: An experiential interpretation. Human Development, 41, 7–29.
Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1995). Teaching theory of mind—a new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 415–433.
Perner, J., & Davies, G. (1991). Understanding the mind as an active information processor—do young children have a copy theory of mind? Cognition, 39, 51–69.
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.
Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (1998). Changing focus on the representational mind: Deaf, autistic and normal children's concepts of false photos, false drawings and false beliefs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 301–320.
Reed, T., & Peterson, C. (1990). A comparative study of autistic subjects'performance at 2 levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 555–567.
Roth, D., & Leslie, A. M. (1998). Solving belief problems: toward a task analysis. Cognition, 66, 1–31.
Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Picador.
Segar, M. (1997). Coping: a survival guide for people with Asperger syndrome. Unpublished.
Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind'. Mind & Language, 14, 131–153.
Surian, L., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Competence and performance in false belief understanding: a comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 141–155.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1999). A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 325–334.
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (1994). Predicting and explaining behaviour: A comparison of autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1059–1075.
Taylor, M. (1988). Conceptual perspective taking: Children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see. Child Development, 62, 1334–1351.
Williams, D. (1994). Somebody somewhere. London: Doubleday.
Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 283–307.
Yirmiya, N., Solomonica Levi, D., Shulman, G., & Pilowsky, T. (1996). Theory of mind abilities in individuals with autism, Down syndrome, and mental retardation of unknown etiology: The role of age and intelligence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 37, 1003–1014.
Zaitchik, D. (1990). When representations conflict with reality: The pre-schoolers'problem with false belief and “false” photographs. Cognition, 35, 41–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luckett, T., Powell, S.D., Messer, D.J. et al. Do Children with Autism Who Pass False Belief Tasks Understand the Mind as Active Interpreter?. J Autism Dev Disord 32, 127–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844722931
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844722931