Skip to main content
Log in

Do Children with Autism Who Pass False Belief Tasks Understand the Mind as Active Interpreter?

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpretive diversity is the term used by Carpendale and Chandler (1996) to refer to the fact that two individuals exposed to precisely the same stimulus may interpret it in quite different, but equally plausible, ways. An appreciation of interpretive diversity is said by Carpendale and Chandler to represent a development in understanding that is qualitatively different from that necessary to succeed on false belief tasks. A study is reported in which children with autism and children with general delay were given a battery of tasks consisting of false belief tasks and tasks designed to test for an understanding of interpretive diversity. Findings from the present study offer limited support for Carpendale and Chandler's claim that tasks which test for an understanding of interpretive diversity may be more difficult than false belief tasks. Between-group differences in the consistency and quality of responses given by participants suggest that autistic and delayed children may have differed somewhat in their approach to the tasks given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., & Olson, D. R. (1995). The cognitive revolution in children's understanding of mind. Human Development, 38, 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). Out of sight or out of mind: Another look at deception in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1141–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Goodhart, F. (1994). The “seeing-leads-toknowing” deficit in autism: The Pratt and Bryant probe. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. (1989). Test for reception of grammar. Manchester, University of Manchester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M. (1992). “Theory of mind” in Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 607–616.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I., & Chandler, M. J. (1996). On the distinction between false belief understanding and subscribing to an interpretive theory of mind. Child Development, 67, 1686–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. J., & Boyes, M. (1982). Social cognitive development. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 387–402). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charman, T., & Campbell, A. (1997). Reliability of theory of mind task performance by individuals with a learning disability: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 725–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., Glucksberg, S., & Kinchla, R. A. (1986). Psychology (3rd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., Happe, F., & Siddons, F. (1994). Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development, 3, 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder—autism. Trends in Neurosciences, 14, 433–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Howlin, P., & Hill, K. (1996). Can we teach children with autism to understand emotions, belief, or pretence? Development and Psychopathology, 8, 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happe, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe, F. G. E. (1994). Autism: an introduction to psychological theory. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happe, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal-ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (1994). Sampling the form of inner experience in three adults with Asperger syndrome. Psychological Medicine, 24, 385–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow, J. (1900). Fact and fable in psychology. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazak, S., Collis, G. M., & Lewis, V. (1997). Can young people with autism refer to knowledge states? Evidence from their understanding of “know” and “guess.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 1001–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leekam, S. R., & Perner, J. (1991). Does the autistic child have a metarepresentational deficit? Cognition, 40, 203–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., (1994). Pretending and believing—issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism (pp. 83–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., & Thaiss, L. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development—neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43, 225–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, R. E., Tunali, B., & Kelley, M. L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Downs-syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., Plesa, D., & Henseler, S. (1998). Children's theory of mind: An experiential interpretation. Human Development, 41, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1995). Teaching theory of mind—a new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 415–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Davies, G. (1991). Understanding the mind as an active information processor—do young children have a copy theory of mind? Cognition, 39, 51–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (1998). Changing focus on the representational mind: Deaf, autistic and normal children's concepts of false photos, false drawings and false beliefs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, T., & Peterson, C. (1990). A comparative study of autistic subjects'performance at 2 levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D., & Leslie, A. M. (1998). Solving belief problems: toward a task analysis. Cognition, 66, 1–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segar, M. (1997). Coping: a survival guide for people with Asperger syndrome. Unpublished.

  • Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind'. Mind & Language, 14, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surian, L., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Competence and performance in false belief understanding: a comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (1999). A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (1994). Predicting and explaining behaviour: A comparison of autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1059–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1988). Conceptual perspective taking: Children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see. Child Development, 62, 1334–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (1994). Somebody somewhere. London: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 283–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yirmiya, N., Solomonica Levi, D., Shulman, G., & Pilowsky, T. (1996). Theory of mind abilities in individuals with autism, Down syndrome, and mental retardation of unknown etiology: The role of age and intelligence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 37, 1003–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitchik, D. (1990). When representations conflict with reality: The pre-schoolers'problem with false belief and “false” photographs. Cognition, 35, 41–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luckett, T., Powell, S.D., Messer, D.J. et al. Do Children with Autism Who Pass False Belief Tasks Understand the Mind as Active Interpreter?. J Autism Dev Disord 32, 127–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844722931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844722931

Navigation