Skip to main content
Log in

Authorship and citation patterns in Management Science in comparison with operational research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authorship and citation patterns in the journal titled Management Science (MS) are analysed. The purpose of the analysis is to examine the competitive relation of MS with OR (operational research or operations research). The analysis is focused on the use of mathematical methods, because MS entered the management research area by using mathematical methods developed by OR and because the use of mathematical methods in real management is facing difficulties. The relationship of MS with information systems (IS) and organisation research (Org) is analysed in regard to the competition of MS with OR. The analysis reveals the intermediate character of MS; that is, MS is less prone to mathematical methods and is more inclined towards IS and Org than OR is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. M. S. Blackett, Operational research, Operational Research Quarterly, 1 (1950) 3-6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. F. Smiddy, L. Naum, Evolution of management science in America, Management Science, 1 (1954) 1-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Reisman, F. Kirschnick, The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals, Operations Research, 42 (1994) 577-588.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. E. V. Budilova, J. A. Drogalina, A. T. Teriokhin, Principal trends in modern ecology and its mathematical tools: An analysis of publications, Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 147-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. V. Nemtsov, N. A. Zorin, Mathematical methods in psychiatric papers, Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 121-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Eto, Relationship of mathematical programming with mathematics, economic/ regional planning and other specialties, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 311-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Eto, Bibliometric distance between methodology and application in statistics, Scientometrics, 48 (2000) 85-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Eto, Authorship and citation patterns in operational research journals in relation to competition and reform, Scientometrics 47 (2000) 25-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. R. Pereira, A. L. Fischer, M. M. L. Escuder, Driving factors of high performance in Brazilian Management Science for the 1981-1995 period, Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 307-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Danell, Stratification among journals in management research: A bibliometric study of interaction between European and American journals, Scientometrics 49 (2000) 23-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Danell, L. Engwall, O. Persson, The first mover and the challenger: The relationship between two journals in organization research, Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 445-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. J. Cunningham, S. M. Dillon, Authorship patterns in information systems, Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 19-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. C. Tomlinson, I. Kiss (Eds), Rethinking the Process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eto, H. Authorship and citation patterns in Management Science in comparison with operational research. Scientometrics 53, 337–349 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014821012420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014821012420

Keywords

Navigation