Abstract
This paper explored attitudes towards work and family roles of professional men and women in India. Ninety-two husband–wife pairs from salaried, upper middle class, dual-career families in India participated in the study. Propositions based on adult development theories of men and women, regarding reward value derived from and commitment made to occupational, parental, marital, and homemaker roles over the life cycle, were tested. Results indicated that there was no change with age, in attitudes towards occupational and homemaker roles. Instead, gender-based differences in attitudes towards these roles were observed. Attitudes towards the marital and parental role varied across the life cycle, although not in keeping with propositions based on the adult development theories of men and women. There was no reversal in attitudes towards work and family roles of men and women after midlife. Rather, some reversal in attitudes appeared to occur between the marital and parental role, over the life span of both men and women. Results are reviewed within the Indian cultural context and their implications for the career development of women are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aldous, J. (1982). From dual-earner to dual-career families and back again. In J. Aldous (Ed.), Two paychecks: Life in dual-earner families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Amatea, E., Cross, G., Clark, J., & Bobby, C. (1986). Assessing the work and family role expectations of career-oriented men and women: The life role salience scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 831-838.
Aryee, S. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work—family conflict among married professional women: Evidence from Singapore. Human Relations, 45(8), 813-837.
Aryee, S., & Luk, V. (1996). Balancing two major parts of adult life experience:Work and family identity among dual-earner couples. Human Relations, 49(4), 465-487.
Bardwick, J. (1980). The seasons of a woman's life. In D. G. McGuigan (Ed.), Women's lives: New theory, research and policy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework: Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
Chi-Ching, Y. (1995). The effects of career salience and life-cycle variables on perceptions of work family interfaces. Human Relations, 48(3), 265-284.
Day, A. (1999). Committing to your work, spouse and children: Does role commitment exacerbate or alleviate work—family conflict? Proceedings of the Third Australian Industrial and Organizational Conference, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 26-27.
Erikson, E. (1978). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gallos, J. V. (1989). Exploring women's development: Implications for career theory, practice and research. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 110-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1980). Restoring the missing text of women's development to life cycle theories. In D. McGuigan (Ed.), Women's lives: New theories, research, and policy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Green, P. E., Tull, D. S., & Abraham, G. (1995). Research for marketing decisions. New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall.
Jick, T. (1979). Mixing quantitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. In J. V. Mannen (Ed.), Quantitative methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive—developmental approach to socialization. In D. Gasin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. New York: Rand McNally.
Levinson, D. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Knopf.
Mitra, A., Pathak, L., & Mukherjee, S. (1980). The status of women: Shifts in occupational participation, 1961-1971. New Delhi, India: Abhinav Publications.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.
Ramu, G. N. (1989). Women, work and marriage in urban India: A study of dual and single career couples. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Sekaran, U., & Hall, D. T. (1993). Asynchronism in dual-career and family linkages. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 159-180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singh, A. K., & Sahgal, P. (1995). Men and women in transition: Patterns of stress, strain and social relations. Vikalpa, 20(1), 13-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhatnagar, D., Rajadhyaksha, U. Attitudes Towards Work and Family Roles and Their Implications for Career Growth of Women: A Report from India. Sex Roles 45, 549–565 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014814931671
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014814931671