Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ecological Condition of South Florida Estuaries

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An assessment of the ecological condition ofsouth Florida estuaries based on regional probabilisticmonitoring was conducted during the summer of 1995. Samples anddata were collected on water and sediment quality, benthos, andfish tissue contaminants. Elevated concentrations of metals andpesticides were measured in both sediments and fish tissue withsome exceedances of guidance values. Bottom dissolved oxygenlevels over 23–37% of the area were below state criteria. Eighty-eight percent of surface waters had greater than10% penetration of ambient light to a depth of 1.0 m. Ninepercent of the area studied in South Florida exhibited degradedbiology and impaired use based on a calculated index ofecological condition. Using the probability-based monitoringdesign, useful information of this type can be provided toresource managers regarding estuarine condition on a regional scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boesch, D. F. and Rosenberg, R.: 1981, ‘Response to Stress in Marine Benthic Communities'. In: G. W. Barret and R. Rosenberg (eds), Stress Effects on Natural Ecosystems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet, J.:1932, Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Communities, (Transl. rev. and ed. by C. D. Fuller and H. S. Conard), Hafner, London, 439 pp.

  • Engle, V. D., Summers, J. K. and Gaston, G.: 1994, ‘A benthic index of environmental condition of Gulf of Mexico estuaries',Estuaries 17(2), 372–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, V. D. and Summers, J. K.: 1999, ‘Refinement, validation, and application of a benthic indexfor Northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries, Estuaries 22(3a), 624–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, V. D.: 2000, ‘Application of the IndicatorEvaluation Guidelines to an Index of Benthic Condition for Gulf of Mexico Estuaries'. In: L. E. Jackson, J. C. Kurtz and W. S. Fisher (eds), Evaluation Guidelines for Ecological Indicators, EPA/620/R-99/005 U.S, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection: 1996, Surface Water Quality Standards,62–302, 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration, Shellfish Sanitation Branch: 1971, National shellfish register of classified estuarinewaters. Northeast Technical Services Unit: Davisville, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournie, J. W., Summers, J. K. and Weisberg, S. B.: 1996, ‘Prevalence ofgross pathological abnormalities in estuarine fishes', Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 125, 581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Governors Commission for a Sustainable So.Florida: 1995, Initial Report, October 1 1995, 189 pp.

  • Hyland, J. L., Balthis, L., Hackney, C. T., McRae, G., Ringwood, A. H., Snoots, T. R., Van Dolah, R. F. and Wade, T. L.: 1998, Environmental quality of estuaries of the Carolinian Province: 1995. Annual statistical summary for the 1995 EMAP-Estuaries Demonstration Project in the Carolinian Province. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 123 NOAA/NOS, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, Silver Springs, MD, 143 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. J.: 1990, ‘InshoreMarine Habitats'. In: Ronald L. Myers and John J. Ewel (eds), Ecosystems of Florida, University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL, pp. 549–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, E. R., MacDonald, Smith, S. L. and Calder, F. D.: 1995, Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges ofchemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments, Environ. Manage. 19, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, K., Smith, R. G., Lee, R. F., Windom, H. L., Heitmuller, P. T., Macauley, J. M. and Summers, J. K.: 1998, ‘Distribution of total mercury and methyl mercury in water, sediment, and fish from South Florida estuaries, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, J. M., Summers, J. K. and Engle, V. D.: 1999, ‘Estimating the ecological condition of the estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico', Environ. Monit. Assess. 57(1), 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, J. M., Engle, V. D., Summers, J. K., Clark, J. R. and Flemer, D. A.: 1995, ‘An assessment of water quality andprimary productivity in Perdido Bay, a Northern Gulf of Mexico estuary', Environ. Monit. Assess. 36, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen, C. E.:1983, Compilation of Legal Limits for Hazardous Substances in Fish and Fishery Products, FAO fisheries Circular No. 764, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 102 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. I., Fulton, M. H., Kucklick, J. R. and Thayer, G.: 1995b,'An Ecotoxicological Assessment of Pesticide and Urban Nonpoint Source Runoff into Florida Bay and Surrounding Environments'. In: R. J. Brock, J. C. Cato and W. Seaman (organizers), Florida Bay Science Conference: A Report by Principal Investigators, 17 and 18 October 1995, Gainesville, Florida. Abstracts and program. NPS, NBS, NOAA, USGS, FWS, COE, FKNMS, FDEP, and SFWMD, pp. 34–36.

  • Sokal, R. R.and Rohlf, F. J.: 1981, Biometry, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K.: 2001, ‘Ecologicalcondition of the estuaries of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States', Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20(1), pp. 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K., Paul, J. F. and Roberson, A.: 1995, ‘Monitoring the ecological conditions of estuaries in the United States', Toxicol.Environ. Chem. 49, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of the Interior – United States Geological Survey: 1996, Mercury and Periphytonin the South Florida Ecosystem. FS-184-96.

  • U.S. EPA.: 1995, EnvironmentalMonitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP):LaboratoryMethods Manual – Estuaries, Volume 1: Biologicaland Physical Analyses. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI, EPA/620/R-95?008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H. G.: 1984, ‘Diversity, biotic and similarity indices', WaterRes. 18(6), 653–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieman, J. C.: 1982, The Ecology of the Seagrasses of South Florida: A Community Profile, U.S. Fishand Wildlife Services, Office of Biological Services, Wash., D.C. FWS/OBS-82/25, 158 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gulf Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, Florida, U.S.A.

    J. M. Macauley, J. K. Summers, V. D. Engle & L. C. Harwell

Authors
  1. J. M. Macauley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. K. Summers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. D. Engle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. C. Harwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Macauley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macauley, J.M., Summers, J.K., Engle, V.D. et al. The Ecological Condition of South Florida Estuaries. Environ Monit Assess 75, 253–269 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014800217354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014800217354

Search

Navigation