Skip to main content
Log in

Burke's Dialogic Theory: An Epistemology of Interpretive Practice for Poetry Therapy

  • Published:
Journal of Poetry Therapy

Abstract

Emergent from the Pre-Raphaelite and Symbolist Movements in painting and poetry, Kenneth Burke's epistemology for interpretive practice contributed to the aesthetics of oral interpretation of literature. In this historical study, the author summarizes Burke's dialogic theories and exemplifies how they describe not only Edward Burne-Jones's interpretations of his paintings, but also his painted interpretations of poetry. The author then discusses how Burke's epistemology of interpretive practice contributes to the discipline of poetry therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bacon, W. (1972). The art of interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1966.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, E. & Bahn, M. (1970). A history of oral interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth, A. (1997). The Word's body: An incarnational aesthetic of interpretation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1979.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1982). Affectivity: Its language and meaning. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, R. (1954). Language as gesture: Essays in poetry. London: Allen and Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1968). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969a). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1945.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969b). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1950.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K. (1967). Personality-shaping through positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K. & Piechowski, M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development: Multilevelness and positive disintegration (Vols. I & II). New York: Dabor Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (1956). Symbols of transformation (Vol.5) (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. (1951). Philosophy in a new key. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. (1984). Semiotic phenomenology of rhetoric: Eidetic practice in Henry Grattan's discourse on tolerance. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. (1952). Empathy. In M. Rader (Ed.), A modern book of esthetics, 460–465. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (1992). Poiesis: The language of psychology and the speech of the soul. London and Bristol, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancoff, D. (1998). Burne-Jones. San Francisco, CA: Pomegranate.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, S. (1987). The interpretation of art. Journal of the Canadian Art Therapy Association, 3(1), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J. (1993). Paradise lost. S. Elledge (Ed.). (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1674.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyers, B. (1996). Introduction. In B. Flowers (Ed.), Genesis: A living conversation. (pp.xiii–xii). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (2000). Composing dialogues to express self-differentiation and Burke's rhetoric: A way to comprehend multilevel inner growth. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 23(1), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, G. (1976). Metaphor and knowing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.

  • Roloff, L. (1973). The perception and evocation of literature. Glenview, ILL: Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, R. (1993). Foreword. In Spiro, Curnen, Peschel, St. James (Eds.), Empathy and the practice of medicine. (pp.ix–x). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1997). Sonnet 23. In H.Vendler (Ed.), The art of Shakespeare's sonnets, 141. (Original work published 1609.)

  • White, E. (1999). Introduction. In O. Wilde, The picture of Dorian Gray. (pp.v–xvi). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, O. (2000). The critic as artist. In M. H. Abrams (Ed.), The Norton anthology of English literature (Vol. 2). New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1890.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, S., & Christian, J. (1998). Edward Burne-Jones: Victorian artist-dreamer. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N. (2000). Writing argumentative essays. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, W. (1961). Essays and introductions. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1902.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, M.A. Burke's Dialogic Theory: An Epistemology of Interpretive Practice for Poetry Therapy. Journal of Poetry Therapy 15, 57–70 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014769430857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014769430857

Navigation