Skip to main content
Log in

In Defence of Burge's Thesis

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Burge's thesis is the thesis that certain second-order self-ascriptionsare self-verifying in virtue of their self-referential form. The thesis hasrecently come under attack on the grounds that it does not yield a theory ofself-knowledge consistent with semantic externalism, and also on the groundsthat it is false. In this paper I defend Burge's thesis against both charges,in particular against the arguments of Bernecker, Gallois and Goldberg. Thealleged counterexamples they provide are merely apparent counterexamples, andthe thesis is adequate to its proper task. To think otherwise is simply tomisunderstand the thesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bernecker, S. (1996): 'Externalism and the Attitudinal Component of Self-Knowledge', Nous 30, 262-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, A. (1992): 'What an Anti-Individualist Knows A Priori', Analysis 52, 111-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, A. (1999): 'Two Recent Approaches to Self-Knowledge', Philosophical Perspectives 13, 251-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1977): 'Belief De Re', The Journal of Philosophy 74, 338-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1988): 'Individualism and Self-Knowledge', Journal of Philosophy 85, 649-663. Reprinted in Cassam, Q. (ed.) (1994): Self-Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press. All page references to the reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1996): 'Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCVI, 91-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1998): 'Reason and the First Person', in C. Wright, B. Smith and C. MacDonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds (pp. 243-270), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1999): 'A Century of Deflation and a Moment about Self-Knowledge', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73, 25-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1984): 'First Person Authority', Dialectica 38, 101-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1987): 'Knowing One's Own Mind', Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 60, 441-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, K. and Owens, J. (1994): 'Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism', Philosophical Review 103, 107-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallois, A. (1996): The World Without, The Mind Within: An Essay on First-Person Authority, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. (2000): 'Is “I Am Presently Thinking That p” Self-Verifying?' Presented at the Central States Philosophical Association Meeting in Lincoln, Nebraska.

  • Heil, J. (1988): 'Privileged Access', Mind 97, 238-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, C. (1998): 'Externalism and Authoritative Self-Knowledge', in C. Wright, B. Smith and C.MacDonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds (pp. 123-154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, H.W. (1993): 'Object-Dependent Thoughts: A Case of Superficial Necessity but Deep Contingency?', in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation (pp. 283-308), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (1996): 'Entitlement, Self-Knowledge, and Conceptual Redeployment', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCVI, 117-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (1999): Being Known, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1994): 'Self-Knowledge and “Inner Sense”', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 249-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. (1991): 'On Putnam's Proof that we are not Brains-in-a-Vat', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91, 67-94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawyer, S. In Defence of Burge's Thesis. Philosophical Studies 107, 109–128 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014727219134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014727219134

Keywords

Navigation