Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Consequences of Transfer Fee Regulations in European Football

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss the effects of three different transfer fee systems in European football on contract lengths, wages, profits, education incentives and the number of talents being educated. The different regimes, being used until the Bosman judgement of 1995, currently in use, and recently proposed by the European Commission differ with respect to the transfer fee an initial club must accept in case of a transfer depending on whether a player has a valid contract or not. In particular, we argue that due to its averse effects on investment incentives, the Commission should refrain from its Suggestion of abolishing freely negotiable transfer fees. Our analysis also sheds some light on the issue under which circumstances binding long-term contracts should be allowed in general labor law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (1997). “Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market.” Review of Economic Studies. 64,445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, S. (1998). “Why Do Firms Train?” Theory and Evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics.113, 79–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, S. (1999a). “Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labour Markets.” Economic Journal.109, 112–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, S. (1999b). “The Structure of Wages and Investment in General Training.” Journal ofPolitical Economy. 107, 539–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. & Bolton, P. (1987). “Contracts as Barriers to Entry.” American Economic Review.77, 380–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. & Hermalin, B. (1990). “Legal Restrictions on Private Contracts Can Enhance Efficiency.” Journal of Law,Economics and Organization. 381–409.

  • Antonioni, P. & Cubbin, J. (2000). “The Bosman Ruling and the Emergence of a Single Market inSoccer Talent.” European Journal of Law and Economics. 9, 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G., Gertner, H., & Picker, R. C. (1994). GameTheory and the Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital, Chicago.

  • Bundeskanzleramt(2000). “Joint Statement by Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and Prime Minister Tony Blair.” Press Release No. 425/00.

  • Chang, C. & Wang, Y.(1996). “Human Capital Investment under Asymmetric Information: The Pigouvian Conjecture Reconsidered.” Journal of Labor Economics. 14, 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court of Justice of the European Communities. Case C-415/93, 1995.

  • Demsetz, H. (1972). “When Does the Rule ofLiability Matter?” Journal of Legal Studies. 1, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, C. (2000), “Arbeitsmarkt und staatliche Regulierung.”Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtler. 59, 55–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feess, E. & Mühlheußer, G. (2000). “The Impact ofthe Transfer Fee System on Professional Football: An Analysis of the European Commission' New Suggestion.” Mimeo.

  • Feess, E. & Mühlheußer, G. (2001a). “Transfer Fee Regulations in European Football.” Mimeo.

  • Feess, E. & Mühlheußer, G. (2001b). “Auswirkungendes neuen Transfersystems auf den Europäischen Fussball: Eine mikroökonomische Analyse.” Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, forthcoming.

  • FIFA. (2000). “International Transfer System: Agreement in Principle but Decision Still to be Taken,” Report, Aug. 31.

  • Harhoff, D. & Kane, T. (1997). “Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the U.S. Labor Market?” Journal of Population Economics. 10, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and Ziderman, A. (1990). “Investment in General Training: The Role of Information and Labor Mobility.” EconomicJournal. 100, 1147–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Késenne, S. (1999). “Player Market Regulation and Competitive Balance in a Win Maximizing Scenario.”In C. Jeanrenaud and S. Késenne (eds.), Competition Policy in Professional Sports, Neuchatel.

  • Kessler, A. & Lülfesmann, C. (2000).“The Theory of Human Capital Revisited: On the Interaction of General and Specific Investments.” Mimeo, University of Bonn.

  • Pons, J.-F.(1999). “Sport and European Competition Policy.” Mimeo, European Commission, Brussels.

  • Quirk, J. & Fort, R. (1995). Pay Dirt: TheBusiness of Professional Team Sports, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, K. & Whinston, M. D. (1995). “On the Efficiencyof Privately Stipulated Damages for Breach of Contract: Entry Barriers, Reliance and Renegotiation.” RAND Journal of Economics. 26, 180–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, H. (1993). “The Economics of Youth Training in Germany.” Economic Journal. 103, 1279–1291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1975). The Citizen and the State, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, S. (1999). “The Market for SoccerPlayers in England after Bosman: Winners and Losers.” In C. Jeanrenaud and S. Késenne (eds.), Competition Policy in Professional Sports, Antwerp: Standard Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, S. & Kuypers, T. (1999). Winners and Losers: The Business Strategy of Football, London.

  • UEFA. (2000). “UEFA to Lobby Transfer System Threat.” Report Aug. 28.

  • Will, D. H. (1999). “The Federation' Viewpoint of the NewTransfer Rules.” In C. Jeanrenaud and S. Késenne (eds.), Competition Policy in Professional Sports, Antwerp: Standard Editions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feess, E., Mühlheußer, G. Economic Consequences of Transfer Fee Regulations in European Football. European Journal of Law and Economics 13, 221–237 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014722600686

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014722600686

Navigation