Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Temperature on Longevity and Productivity in Drosophila Ananassae: Evidence for Adaptive Plasticity and Trade-Off Between Longevity and Productivity

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The genetic response of body size to temperature in the laboratory provides an interesting example of phenotypic plasticity. We found that females of Drosophila ananassae reared to adulthood at 18°C showed significant increase in body weight as compared to females reared at 25°C. At a given temperature, early productivity and lifetime productivity were the highest when the rearing and test temperature were the same. The effect of test temperature was highly significant for total productivity and early productivity. The interaction between test temperature and development temperature was also highly significant. Effect of development temperature was not significant. The females reared at 18°C showed greater body weight but their productivity was not significantly higher than smaller females reared at 25°C. Thus, the usually close relationship between size and fecundity is lost when the size change is due to rearing temperature. These findings provide evidence for adaptive plasticity in D. ananassae. We also found a negative correlation (trade-off) between longevity and productivity, the first report of such a trade-off between longevity and productivity in D. ananassae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betran, E., M. Santos & A. Ruiz, 1998. Antagonistic pleiotropic effect of second-chromosome inversions on body size and early life-history traits in Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 52: 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, S., M. Pigliucci & D. Schlichting, 1997. Developmental phenotypic plasticity: where ecology and evolution meet molecular biology. Bioessay 19: 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., E. Pla & J.R. David, 1993. Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. I. Geographic variations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 25: 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., E. Pla & J.R. David, 1994. Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. II. Within population variability. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B., 1980. Evolution in Age-structured Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippendale, A.K., A.M. Leroi, S.B. Kim & M.R. Rose, 1993. Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohet, Y., J. Vouidibio & J.R. David, 1980. Thermal tolerance and geographic distribution: a comparison of cosmopolitan and tropical endemic Drosophila species. J. Therm. Biol. 5: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R. & C. Bocquet, 1975. Similarities and differences in latitudinal adaptation of two Drosophila sibling species. Nature 257: 588–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R. & L. Tsacas, 1981. Cosmopolitan, subcosmopolitan and widespread species: different strategies within the drosophilid family. Comptes Rendus Soc. Biogeogr. 57: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., R. Allemand, J. van Herrewege & J. Cohet, 1983. Ecophysiology: abiotic factors pp.106–154 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3d, edited by M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson & J.N. Thompson Jr. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotthard, K. & S. Nylin, 1985. Adaptive plasticity and plasticity as an adaptation: a selective review of plasticity in animal morphology and life history. Oikos 74: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, R.B., T. Wakefield, W.D. Crill & G.W. Gilchrist, 1995. Within-and between-generation effect of temperature on early fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74: 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.S., A. Coyne & L. Partridge, 1987. Estimation of the thermal niche of Drosophila melanogaster using a temperature sensitive mutation. Am. Nat. 130: 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi, A.M., A.K. Chippendale & M.R. Rose, 1994. Long term laboratory evolution of a genetic life history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-by-environment interaction. Evolution 48: 1244–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1966. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, J. & L. Partridge, 1997. An interaction between environmental temperature and genetic variation for body size for the fitness of adult female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 51: 1164–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.P., B. Moreteau, G. Petavy, R. Parkash & J.R. David, 1997. Reaction norms of morphological traits in Drosophila: adaptive shape changes in a stenotherm circumtropical species? Evolution 51: 1140–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney, L., 1996. The response to selection for fast larval development in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on adult weight: an example of a fitness trade-off. Evolution 50: 1193–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney, L. & W. Cheung, 1997. The effect of temperature on body size and fecundity in female Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for adaptive plasticity. Evolution 51: 1529–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. & J.M. Smith, 1990. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., K. Fowler, S. Trevitt & W. Sharp, 1986. An examination of the effect of males on the survival and egg production rates of female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Phys. 32: 925–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., B. Barrie., N.H. Barton, K. Fowler & V. French, 1995. Rapid laboratory evolution of adult life history traits in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 49: 538–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F.W., 1957. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 55: 428–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M.L., 1991. Evolutionary Biology of aging. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N., 1985. Drosophila ananassae — a genetically unique species. Nucleus 28: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N., 1996. Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 97: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N., 2000. Drosophila ananassae — a species characterised by several unusual genetic features. Curr. Sci. 78: 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N. & S. Mathew, 1996. Greater mating success of Drosophila ananassae flies possessing high number of sternopleural bristles. Curr. Sci. 70: 1088–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N. & S. Mathew, 1997. Greater fertility of Drosophila ananassa flies posessing high number of sternopleural bristles. Curr. Sci. 72: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N. & S.R. Singh, 2001. Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: evidence for sperm displacement and greater productivity after remating. Zool. Sci. 18: 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S.C., 1989. Trade-offs in life history evolution. Func. Ecol. 3: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S.C., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S.C., M. Ackermann, M. Doebeli & M. Kaiser, 2000. Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 3309–3313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantawy, A.O. & F.A. Rakha, 1964. Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. IV. Genetic variances of and correlations between four characters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genetics 50: 1349–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C., 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11: 398–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamudio, K.R., R.B. Huey & W.D. Crill, 1995. Bigger isn't always better: body size developmental and parental temperature and male territorial success in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 49: 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, B.J., R. Bijlsma & R.F. Hoekstra, 1995a. Artificial selection for development time in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to aging: direct and correlated responses. Evolution 49: 635–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, B.J., R. Bijlsma & R.F. Hoekstra, 1995b. Direct selection on lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 49: 649–659.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sisodia, S., Singh, B.N. Effect of Temperature on Longevity and Productivity in Drosophila Ananassae: Evidence for Adaptive Plasticity and Trade-Off Between Longevity and Productivity. Genetica 114, 95–102 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014640604740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014640604740

Navigation