American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 157–197 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta-Analytic Review

  • David L. DuBois
  • Bruce E. Holloway
  • Jeffrey C. Valentine
  • Harris Cooper


We used meta-analysis to review 55 evaluations of the effects of mentoring programs on youth. Overall, findings provide evidence of only a modest or small benefit of program participation for the average youth. Program effects are enhanced significantly, however, when greater numbers of both theory-based and empirically based “best practices” are utilized and when strong relationships are formed between mentors and youth. Youth from backgrounds of environmental risk and disadvantage appear most likely to benefit from participation in mentoring programs. Outcomes for youth at-risk due to personal vulnerabilities have varied substantially in relation to program characteristics, with a noteworthy potential evident for poorly implemented programs to actually have an adverse effect on such youth. Recommendations include greater adherence to guidelines for the design and implementation of effective mentoring programs as well as more in-depth assessment of relationship and contextual factors in the evaluation of programs.

youth mentoring program evaluation primary prevention children adolescents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. *Abbott, D. A., Meredith, W. H., Self-Kelly, R., & Davis, M. E. (1997). The influence of Big Brothers program on the adjustment of boys in single-parent families. Journal of Psychology, 131, 143-156.Google Scholar
  2. *Abcug, L. (1991). Teachers Achieving Success With Kids (TASK): A teacher-student mentorship program for at-risk students (M. S. Practicum, Nova University). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED330974)Google Scholar
  3. *Aiello, H. S. (1988). Assessment of a mentor program on self-concept and achievement variables of middle school underachievers (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(07), 1699A.Google Scholar
  4. *Baldwyn Separate School District, MS. (1982). A gifted model designed for gifted students in a small, rural high school. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED233847)Google Scholar
  5. *Banta, T. W., & Lawson, S. S. (1980). Evaluation of the Lenoir City Schools (Tennessee) Retirement Power in Education Project, 1979-1980. Knoxville, TN: Bureau of Educational Research and Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED201044)Google Scholar
  6. Big government, big brother. (1995, December 25). The New Republic, 7.Google Scholar
  7. *Blakely, C. H., Menon, R., & Jones, D. C. (1995). Project BELONG: Final report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Public Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. *Brooks, L. J. (1995). An evaluation of the VCU Mentoring Program (Doctoral thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(04), 1481A.Google Scholar
  9. *Bruce, D., & Mueller, E. J. (1994). Mentoring: A Cincinnati Youth Collaborative program. Evaluation of outcomes 1993-1994. Cincinnati, OH: Cincinnati Youth Collaborative.Google Scholar
  10. *Buman, B., & Cain, R. (1991). The impact of short term, work oriented mentoring on the employability of low-income youth. (Available from Minneapolis Employment and Training Program, 510 Public Service Center, 250 S. 4th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415)Google Scholar
  11. *Cave, G., & Quint, J. (1990). Career beginnings impact evaluation: Findings from a program for disadvantaged high school students. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED325598)Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. *Colson, S. (1979). Evaluating career education for gifted and talented students. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 51-62.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, H., Charlton, K., Valentine, J. C., & Muhlenbruck, L. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(1, Serial No. 260).Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Cowen, E. L. (1985). Person-centered approaches to primary prevention in mental health: Situation-focused and competence-enhancement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 31-48.Google Scholar
  18. Cowen, E. L., Hightower, A. D., Pedro-Carroll, J., Work, W. C., Wyman, P. A., & Haffey, W. C. (1996). School based prevention for at-risk children: The Primary Mental Health Project. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Darling, N., Hamilton, S. F., & Niego, S. (1994). Adolescents' relations with adults outside the family. In R. Montemayor & G. R. Adams (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 216-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, W. S., & Redner, R. (1988). The prevention of juvenile delinquency: Diversion from the juvenile justice system. In R. H. Price, E. L. Cowen, R. P. Lorion, & J. Ramos-McKay (Eds.), Fourteen ounces of prevention: Theory, research, and prevention (pp. 123-137). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  21. *Davis, H. (1988). A mentor program to assist in increasing academic achievement and attendance of at-risk ninth grade students (Doctoral thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(03), 0580A.Google Scholar
  22. *Davison, A. R. (1994). A culturally-enriched career and tutorial program and the vocational interests and career beliefs of at-risk middle school students (Doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(02), 492A.Google Scholar
  23. *Dicken, C., Bryson, R., & Kass, N. (1977). Companionship therapy: A replication of experimental community psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 637-642.Google Scholar
  24. Dickersin, K. (1994). Research registers. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 71-83). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. DuBois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 227-234.Google Scholar
  26. Durlak, J. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (1991). A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 291-332.Google Scholar
  27. Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 115-152.Google Scholar
  28. Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1998). Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) for children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 775-802.Google Scholar
  29. *Flaherty, B. P. (1985). An experiment in mentoring high school students assigned to basic courses (Doctoral thesis, Boston University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(02), 0352A.Google Scholar
  30. Flaxman, E., Ascher, C., & Harrington, C. (1988). Youth mentoring: Programs and practices (Urban Diversity Series No. 97). NewYork: Teachers College, Columbia University. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED308257)Google Scholar
  31. Fo, W. S., & O'Donnell, C. R. (1974). The Buddy System: Relationship and contingency conditions in a community intervention program with nonprofessionals as behavior change agents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 163-169.Google Scholar
  32. *Fo, W. S., & O'Donnell, C. R. (1975). The Buddy System: Effects of community intervention on delinquent offenses. Behavior Therapy, 6, 522-524.Google Scholar
  33. Freedman, M. (1988). Partners in growth: Elder mentors and at-risk youth. Philadelphia: Private/ Public Ventures.Google Scholar
  34. Freedman, M. (1992). The kindness of strangers: Reflections on the mentoring movement. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  35. *Galvin, P. F. (1989). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation of a big brother/big sister program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 53-57.Google Scholar
  36. *George, A. Z. (1986). Big Brothers of Greater Los Angeles: An evaluation from a social learning theory approach (Doctoral thesis, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(08), 2806B.Google Scholar
  37. *Goodman, S. (1972). Companionship therapy: Studies in structured intimacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. *Graber, M. (1985, March). The effects of an internship program on the psychosocial development of high school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  39. *Green, B. C. (1979). An evaluation of a Big Brothers' program for father-absent boys: An ecobehavioral analysis (Doctoral thesis, New York University, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(02), 0671B.Google Scholar
  40. *Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403-426.Google Scholar
  41. Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (1992, March). Mentoring programs: Promise and paradox. Phi Delta Kappan, 546-550.Google Scholar
  42. *Harmon, M. A. (1995). Reducing drug use among pregnant and parenting teens: A program evaluation and theoretical examination (Doctoral thesis, University of Maryland College Park, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(08), 3319A.Google Scholar
  43. *Hayes, G. L. (1998). An evaluation of a staff mentor program for at-risk students in an Oregon high school: CAKE (Caring About Kids Effectively) (Doctoral thesis, Portland State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(05), 1517A.Google Scholar
  44. *Hayward, B. J., & Tallmadge, G. K. (1995). Strategies for keeping kids in school: Evaluation of dropout prevention and reentry projects in vocational education (Final Report). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED385767)Google Scholar
  45. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.Google Scholar
  48. *Hill, M. J. (1972). Partners: Community volunteer and probationer in a one-to-one relationship. Juneau, AL: Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Corrections.Google Scholar
  49. *Howitt, P. S., Moore, E. A., & Gaulier, B. (1998). Winning the battles and the wars: An evaluation of comprehensive, community-based delinquency prevention programming. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 49, 39-49.Google Scholar
  50. *Huisman, C. (1992). Student Mentoring Program 1989-1992: Evaluation report. Portland, OR: Oregon Community Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED356701)Google Scholar
  51. Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  52. *Johnson, A. W. (1997). Mentoring at-risk youth: A research review and evaluation of the impacts of the Sponsor-A-Scholar Program on student performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(03), 813A.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, A. W., & Sullivan, J. W. (1995). Mentoring program practices and effectiveness. In M. Galbraith & N. Cohen (Eds.), Mentoring: New strategies and challenges (pp. 43-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. *Joseph, J. A. (1992). Improving self-esteem of at-risk students. (Educational Specialist Practicum, Nova University). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED343106)Google Scholar
  55. *Keenan, J. T. (1992). Evaluation of a Big Brothers/Big Sisters program for children of alcoholics (Doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(07), 2249A.Google Scholar
  56. *Lakes, K. D. (1997). The effects of a high school mentoring program on selected academic variables. Unpublished master's thesis, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
  57. *Laughrey, M. C. (1990). The design and implementation of a mentor program to improve the academic achievement of Black male high school students (Educational Specialist Practicum Report, Nova University). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED328647)Google Scholar
  58. *Lee, S., Plionis, E., & Luppino, J. (1989). Keep Youth in School: A community based practice model to keep at risk youth in school: Final report. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED314676)Google Scholar
  59. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Lipsey, M. W.,& Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.Google Scholar
  61. *LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., & Taylor, A. S. (1996). Outcome evaluation of Across Ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 116-129.Google Scholar
  62. McCord, J. (1992). The Cambridge-Somerville study: A pioneering longitudinal experimental study of delinquency prevention. In J. McCord & R. J. Tremblay, (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 196-206). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  63. McLearn, K. T., Colasanto, D., & Schoen, C. (1998). Mentoring makes a difference: Findings from The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Adults MentoringYoung People. NewYork: The Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  64. *McPartland, J. M., & Nettles, S. (1991). Using community adults as advocates or mentors for at-risk middle school students. American Journal of Education, 99, 637-642.Google Scholar
  65. *Mertens, B. L. (1988). An evaluation of the Governors' SchoolCommunityLeadership Projects and Civic Mentor Network. (Doctoral Dissertation, Seattle University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(08), 2169A.Google Scholar
  66. *Mitchell, H., & Casto, G. (1988). Team education for adolescent mothers. Logan, UT: Early Intervention Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED299744)Google Scholar
  67. National Mentoring Working Group. (1991). Mentoring: Elements of effective practice. Washington, DC: National Mentoring Partnership.Google Scholar
  68. *Nelson, C., & Valliant, P. M. (1993). Personality dynamics of adolescent boys where the father was absent. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 435-443.Google Scholar
  69. Nettles, S. M. (1991). Community contributions to school outcomes of African-American students. Education and Urban Society, 24, 41-52.Google Scholar
  70. *New York City Board of Education. (1986). High School Attendance Improvement/ Dropout Prevention Program 1984-1985: Final report (OEA Evaluation Report). Brooklyn: Office of Educational Assessment. (ERIC Document Service Reproduction No. ED271529)Google Scholar
  71. *O'Donnell, C. R., Lydgate, T., & Fo, W. S. (1979). The Buddy System: Review and follow-up. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 161-169.Google Scholar
  72. Overton, R. C. (1998). A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. Psychological Methods, 3, 354-379.Google Scholar
  73. Parra, G. R., DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., Nanda, S., Mosakowski, K., Sainz, E., et al. (1998, August). Mentoring relationships for youth: Predictors of perceived benefits and longevity. Paper presented at the 106th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  74. *Powers, L. E., Sowers, J., & Stevens, T. (1995). An exploratory randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and community-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation, 61(1), 33-41.Google Scholar
  75. *Powers, S., & McConner, S. (1997). Project SOAR 1996-1997: Evaluation report. Tucson, AZ: Creative Research Associates. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED412269)Google Scholar
  76. *Quint, J. (1991). Project redirection: Making and measuring a difference. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 75-86.Google Scholar
  77. *Reller, D. J. (1987). A longitudinal study of the graduates of the Peninsula Academies: Final report. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327601)Google Scholar
  78. Rhodes, J. E. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187-196.Google Scholar
  79. *Rhodes, J. E., Haight, W. L., & Briggs, E. C. (1999). The influence of mentoring on the peer relationships of foster youth in relative and non-relative care. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 185-201.Google Scholar
  80. *Rippner, M. (1992). Using businesses as on-site-schools to increase academic achievement and develop employability skills of at-risk students (M.S. Assignment, Nova University). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352459)Google Scholar
  81. *Roberts, A., & Cotton, L. (1994). Note on assessing a mentor program. Psychological Reports, 75, 1369-1370.Google Scholar
  82. Rosenthal, R. (1979). Replications and their relative utility. Replications in Social Psychology, 1, 15-23.Google Scholar
  83. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  84. *Rowland, R.G. (1992). An evaluation of the effects of a mentoring program on at-risk students in selected elementary schools in the North East Independent School District (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(1), 0039A.Google Scholar
  85. *Royse, D. (1998). Mentoring high-risk minority youth: Evaluation of the Brothers Project. Adolescence, 33, 145-158.Google Scholar
  86. Saito, R. N., & Blyth, D. A. (1992). Understanding mentoring relationships. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.Google Scholar
  87. Save the Children. (1999). Overview of Save the Children's National Mentoring Database [On-line]. Available: Scholar
  88. *Seidle, F. W. (1982). Big Sisters: An experimental evaluation. Adolescence, 17, 117-128.Google Scholar
  89. *Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. The School Counselor, 40, 327-333.Google Scholar
  90. *Smith, M. A. B. (1990). The teen incentive program: A research and evaluation model for adolescent pregnancy prevention (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(09), 3244A.Google Scholar
  91. *Stanwyck, D. A., & Anson, C. A. (1989). The Adopt-A-Student Evaluation Project: Final report. Atlanta: Georgia State University, Department of Educational Foundations.Google Scholar
  92. *Tierney, J. P., Grossman, J. B., & Resch, N. L. (1995). Making a difference. An impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  93. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  94. *Turner, S., & Scherman, A. (1996). Big brothers: Impact on little brothers' self-concepts and behaviors. Adolescence, 31, 875-882.Google Scholar
  95. *Valenzuela-Smith, M. (1984). The effectiveness of a tutoring program for junior high Latino students (Doctoral thesis, University of San Francisco, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(03), 0634A.Google Scholar
  96. Wang, M. C., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Integrating results through meta-analytic review using SAS Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  97. *Watson, S. H. (1996). A study on the effects of four different types of mentoring plans using retired community individuals and college students as mentors on Hispanic “at risk” students' grades and attendance (Masters thesis, Stephen F. Austin State University, 1996). Masters Abstracts International, 35(05), 1133.Google Scholar
  98. Werner, E. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 81-85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. DuBois
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Holloway
    • 1
  • Jeffrey C. Valentine
    • 1
  • Harris Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations