Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Evolving Structure of the Environmental Justice Movement in the United States: New Models for Democratic Decision-Making

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last two decades in the United States, mainstream environmental organizations have reduced, rather than increased, democratic participation by citizens in environmental problem-solving. The environmental justice movement, on the other hand, has served to enlarge the constituency of the environmental movement by incorporating poorer communities and oppressed people of color into environmental decision making process; build community capacity by developing campaigns and projects that address the common links between various social and environmental problems; and facilitate community empowerment by emphasizing grassroots organizing over advocacy. This paper outlines the different components in the environmental justice movement. It is our contention that if researchers and policymakers continue to conceive of the ecological crisis as a collection of unrelated problems, then it is possible that some combination of regulations, incentives, and technical innovations can keep pollution and resource destruction at “tolerable” levels for more affluent socioeconomic populations. However, poor working class communities and people of color which lack the political–economic resources to defend themselves will continue to suffer the worst abuses. However, if the interdependency of issues is emphasized as advocated by the environmental justice movement, then a transformative environmental politics can be invented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alston, D. (1991). We Speak for Ourselves: Social Justice, Race, and Environment, Panos Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, A., and Alston, D. (1993). An open letter to funding colleagues: New developments in the environmental justice movement, The NewWorld Foundation and the PublicWelfare Foundation.

  • Borgos, S., and Douglas, S. (1986). Community organizing and civil renewal: A view from the south. Soc. Policy 1: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., and Mohai, P. (1992). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (1994). Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (2000). 2000 Directory: People of Color Environment Groups, Environmental Justice Resource Center, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. (1995). Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, P. (1997). A crisis in the nonprofit sector. Natl. Civ. Rev. 86: 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D. (1993). Environment Under Fire: Imperialism and the Ecological Crisis in Central America. Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D. (1998). The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D., and Krieg, E. (2001). Unequal Exposure to Ecological Hazards: Environmental Injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Northeastern University, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerzon, M. (1995). Reinventing philanthropy: Foundations and the renewal of civil society. Natl. Civ. Rev. 84: 188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, R. (1993). Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis, Beacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofrichter, R. (2000). Reclaiming the Environmental Debate: The Politics of Health in a Toxic Culture, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. R. (1994). Who Pays the Price?: The Sociocultural Context of Environmental Crisis, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (1992). Proceedings: The National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenstein, C., and Wooding, J. (1998). Dying for a living:Workers, production, and the environment. In Faber, D. (ed.), The Struggle for Ecological Democracy, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1991). Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Wastes, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, I., Miller, U., and Lee, C. (1992). The principle of environmental justice: Formation and meaning. In Lee, C. (ed.), Proceedings: The First National People of Color Leadership Summit, United Church of Christ, New York.

  • Mohai, P. (ed.). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards, Westview, Boulder, CO.

  • Perfecto, I. (1992). Farm workers, pesticides and the international connection. In Bryant, B. (ed.), Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions, Island, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, L. (1996). Environmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J. (1980). Paradigm change in political science: An ecological perspective. Am. Behav. Scientist 24: 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutkin, W. (2000). The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faber, D., McCarthy, D. The Evolving Structure of the Environmental Justice Movement in the United States: New Models for Democratic Decision-Making. Social Justice Research 14, 405–421 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014602729040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014602729040