Abstract
Harmonization of the instruments used in environmental policy has beenconsidered necessary to guarantee “fair” competition in internationalmarkets. We examine the economic costs of harmonizing paper recyclingstandards in countries where the urgency of the waste disposal problemsdiffer. Using data of seven European countries we estimate thetechnologically feasible input combinations of pulp and waste paper forpaper production. Short-term effects of two environmental policy measures,minimum content requirement and utilization rate target, are analyzed. Bytranslating the two administrative instruments into taxes and subsidies, weshow that the shadow costs of the harmonization vary considerably betweencountries. The difference in the domestic availability of waste may explainthe variation, and a modification of the policy measures to incorporate thisaspect is suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beghin, J. C. and D. A. Sumner (1992), ‘Domestic Content Requirements with Bilateral Monopoly’, Oxford Economic Papers 44, 306–316.
Berndt, E. R. (1991), The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Berndt, E. R. and L. R. Christensen (1973), ‘The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labor in U.S. Manufacturing 1929–1968’, Journal of Econometrics 1, 81–114.
Bertolini, G. (1994), ‘Wastepaper Cycle Management: Incentives and Product Chain Pressure Point or ‘Leverage Point’ Analysis’, in H. Opschoor and K. Turner, eds., Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Beukering, P. van and A. Duraiappah (1998), ‘The Economic and Environmental Impact of Wastepaper Trade and Recycling in India: A Material Balance Approach’, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(2), 23–42.
Bhagwati, J. N. and T. N. Srinivasan (1969), ‘Optimal Intervention to Achieve Non-Economic Objectives’, The Review of Economic Studies 36, 27–38.
Calcott, K. and M. Walls (2000), ‘Can Downstream Waste Disposal Policies Encourage Upstream “Design for Environment”?’, American Economic Review 90, 233–237.
Choe, C. and I. Fraser (1999), ‘An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 234–246.
Conrad, K. (1999), ‘Resource and Waste Taxation in the Theory of the Firm with Recycling Activities’, Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 217–242.
Copeland, B. R. (1991), ‘International Trade in Waste Products in the Presence of Illegal Disposal’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 143–162.
Eichner, T. and R. Pethig (2001), ‘Product Design and Efficient Management of Recycling andWaste Management’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 109–134.
FAO (1997), FAO Provisional Outlook for Global Forest Products Consumption, Production and Trade to 2010, Forestry Policy and Planning Division, Forestry Department. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Fullerton, D. and W. Wu (1998), ‘Policies for Green Design’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 131–148.
Grace, R., R. K. Turner and I. Walter (1978), ‘Secondary Materials and International Trade’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5, 172–186.
Grossman, G.M. (1981), ‘The Theory of Domestic Content Protection and Content Preference’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 96, 583–603.
Hetermäki, L. (1990), ‘Factor Substitution in the Finnish Pulp and Paper Industry’, Acta Forestalia Fennica, 211.
Huhtala, A. (1997), ‘A Post-Consumer Waste Management Model for Determining Optimal Levels of Recycling and Landfilling’, Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 301–314.
Kuh, E. and R. Schmalensee (1973), An Introduction to Applied Macroeconomics, North-Holland.
Michael, J. A. (1998), ‘Recycling, International Trade, and Distribution of Pollution: the Effect of Increased U.S. Import Demand for Canadian Paper’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30, 217–223.
Palmer, K. and M. Walls (1997), ‘Optimal Policies for Solid Waste Disposal — Taxes, Subsidies, and Standards’, Journal of Public Economics 65, 193–205.
Roberts, S. and N. Johnstone (1996), ‘Transport in the Paper Cycle, Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle’, Sub-Study Series No. 12, International Institute for Environmental and Development, United Kingdom.
Ruston, J. and S. Desser (1988), ‘Policy Options for Developing Secondary Materials Markets’, Journal of Resource Management and Technology 16(2), 52–64.
UNDP (1995), ‘Introducing The “Green” Office Programme, Sustainable Development and the Environment’, United Nations Development Programme, Inter-Agency Procurement Services Office.
Weaver, P.M., H. L. Gabel, J. M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard and L. N. van Wassenhove (1997), ‘Optimizing Environmental Product Life Cycles’, Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 199–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huhtala, A., Samakovlis, E. Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense?. Environmental and Resource Economics 21, 259–284 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014585213584
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014585213584