Abstract
How are conceptions of crime as abnormal sustained in the face ofpersistent sociological evidence that crime is normal? While ostensiblyexpressing different images of crime, together the accounts of crime asepisodic ruptures of the social fabric and as a normal feature of healthysocieties sustain the possibility of the sociality necessary for collective life.This paper explores the contradictory relationships between law and crimeas a normal feature of social life and crime as a rupture in the social web.Decades of research in crime, law and deviance have documented howcrime is a constituent and normal feature of any legal system: theorized asan aspect of law; professionally managed through law andinterpreted on the basis of the normal and conventionalcharacter of events and relationships; organized as a reflection andreproduction the encompassing social structure; experienced as familiar,ordinary and frequent. Crime is a normal and expected feature of any legalsystem whose anticipation is a resource for the production of law. Yet inpopular culture, rather than professional sociology, crime is experienced asbizarre, abnormal, a distinct rupture of what is conventionally portrayedas a seamless web of normative conformity. Conceptions of law'sabnormality helps to maintain normal appearances, to sustain the illusionof society, to individualize the event as one person's pathology, to containits threat, and to turn it into an economically and professionally managedproject. The contradictory cultural representations and experiences helpsustain a hegemonic reality in which crime is both a usual feature ofordinary social life to be understood and managed like any other mundanematter, and an episodic event that need not challenge confidence in whatis in effect a reified conception of society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baxi, Upendra, “Comment – Durkheim and Legal Evolution: Some Problems of Disproof,” Law & Society Review 1974 (8), 645–652.
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (New York, Garden City: Anchor Books, 1966).
Bittner, Egon and Sheldon Messinger, Criminology Review Yearbook Volume 2, 1980, pp. 335–338.
Bittner, Egon, Aspects of Police Work (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990).
Black, Donald, The Behavior of Law (New York: Academic Press, 1976).
Durkheim, Emile, [1893] The Division of Labor in Society (New York, Macmillan, 1933).
Ewick, Patricia and Susan S. Silbey, “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative,” Law & Society Review 1995 (29), 197–226.
Ewick, Patricia and Susan S. Silbey, The Common Place of Law: Stories From Everyday Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Freeman, Linton C. and Robert F. Winch, “Societal Complexity: An empirical test of a typology of societies,” American Journal of Sociology 1957 (62), 461–466.
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1979).
Galanter, Marc, “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law & Society Review 1974 (9:1), 95–160.
Hunt, Alan, “Foucault's Expulsion of Law: Toward a Retrieval,” Law & Social Inquiry 1992 (17), 1–38.
Jankowski, Martin Sanchez, Islands in the Street: Gangs and American Urban Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).
Kagan, Richard 1981. Lawsuits and Litigants in Castille 1500–1700. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.
Katz, Jack, Seductions of Crime (New York: Basic Books, 1988).
Llewellyn, Karl N. and E. Adamson Hoebel, The Cheyenne Way: Conflict in Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1941).
Macaulay, Stewart, “Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There Any There There?” Law & Policy 1984 (6), 149.
Marx, Gary T., Undercover: police surveillance in America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).
Merry, Sally E., Urban danger: life in a neighborhood of strangers (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981).
Nonet, Philippe and Philip Selznick, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law (New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1978).
Oates, Joyce Carol, The Mystery of JonBenet Ramsey (New York Review of Books, June 24, 1999).
Pollner, Melvin, “The Very Coinage of Your Brain: The Anatomy of Reality Disjunctures,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1975 (5), 411–430.
Schutz, Alfred, On Phenomenology and Social Relations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).
Schwartz, Richard and James Miller, “Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity,” American Journal of Sociology 1964 (70), 159.
Simon, Jonathan, Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990 (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1993).
Singer, Simon I., Recriminalizing Delinquency: Violent Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice Reform (Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Skolnik, Jerome H., Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society 2nd ed. (New York: John Wiley, 1975).
Spitzer, Stephen, “Punishment and Social Organization: A Study of Durkheim's theory of Penal Evolution,” Law & Society Review 1975 (9), 613–635.
Sudnow, David, “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in Public Defender Office,” Social Problems 1965 (12:3), 255–276.
Trubek, David, Joel Grossman, Herbert Kritzer, William Felstiner and Austin Sarat, Civil Litigation Project Final Report (Madison: Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Law School, 1983).
Turkel, Gerald, “Testing Durkheim: Some Theoretical Considerations,” Law & Society Review 1979 (13), 721–738.
Unger, Roberto, Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (New York: Free Press, 1976).
Wimberley, Howard, “Legal Evolution: One Further Step,” American Journal of Sociology 173(79), 79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silbey, S.S. Mutual engagement: Criminology and the sociology of law. Crime, Law and Social Change 37, 163–175 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014571818493
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014571818493