Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 231–244 | Cite as

Predicting Dysphoria and Hostility Using the Diathesis-Stress Model of Sociotropy and Autonomy in a Contextualized Stress Setting

  • Chitra Raghavan
  • Huynh-Nhu Le
  • Howard Berenbaum

Abstract

We examined the diathesis-stress model of sociotropy and autonomy in the prediction of dysphoria and self-reported hostility. Participants were 39 women who had recently relocated to the United States. Because participants relocated at approximately the same time and for the same reasons (husband enrolled in a university program), we were able to measure multiple stressors that occurred in the same context (relocation). We measured stress comprehensively using semistructured interviews and coded each negative stressor into interpersonal and achievement categories. The match between sociotropy and interpersonal stressors predicted dysphoria, whereas the match between autonomy and achievement stressors predicted hostility. Implications for the diathesis-stress model of sociotropy–autonomy are discussed.

sociotropy autonomy stressful life events depression hostility 

REFERENCES

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., & Hogan, M. E. (1997). Cognitive/personality subtypes of depression: Theories in search of disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 247–265.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Bagby, R. M., Kennedy, S. H., Dickens, S. E., Minifie, C. E., & Schuller, D. R. (1997). Personality and symptom profiles of the angry hostile depressed patient. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 155–160.Google Scholar
  5. Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., Joffe, R. T., Schuller, D., & Gilchrist, E. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Personal Style Inventory (PSI). Assessment, 5, 31–43.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. Clayton & J. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 265–290). New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  7. Bifulco, A., Brown, G. W., Moran, P., Ball, C., & Campbell, C. (1998). Predicting depression in women: The role of past and present vulnerability. Psychological Medicine, 28, 39–50.Google Scholar
  8. Blatt, S. J., & Maroudas, C. (1992). Convergences among psychoanalytic and cognitive- behavioral theories of depression. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 9, 157–190.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, G. W. (1989). Life events and measurement. In G. W. Brown & T. O. Harris (Eds.), Life events and illness (pp. 3–45). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, G.W., & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression. A study of psychiatric disorder in women. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Brown, G. K. (1992). Sociotropy, autonomy, and life event perceptions in dysphoric and non dysphoric individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 635–652.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, A. D., Steer, R. A., Haslam, N., Beck, A. T., & Brown, G. K. (1997). Personality vulnerability, psychiatric diagnoses, and symptoms: Cluster analyses of the Sociotropy- Autonomy Subscales. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 267–283.Google Scholar
  14. Coyne, J. C., & Whiffen, V. E. (1995). Issues in personality as diathesis for depression: The case of sociotropy-dependency and autonomy-self-criticism. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 358–378.Google Scholar
  15. Derogatis, L. R., & Lazarus, L. (1994). SCL-90- R, Brief symptom inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 217–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Dohrenwend, B. P., Raphael, K. G., Schwartz, S., Stueve, A., & Skodol, A. (1993). The structured event probe and narrative rating method for measuring stressful life events. In E. Leo Goldberger & E. Shlomo Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 174–199). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fava, M., Rosenbaum, J. F., Pava, J. A., & McCarthy, M. K. (1993). Anger attacks in unipolar depression: I. Clinical correlates and response to fluoxetine treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1158–1163.Google Scholar
  18. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1998). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Hammen, C. (1991). The generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 555–561.Google Scholar
  20. Hammen, C., Burge, D., Daley, S., Davila, J., Paley, B., & Rudolph, K. (1995). Interpersonal attachment cognitions and prediction of symptomatic responses to interpersonal stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 436–443.Google Scholar
  21. Hammen, C., Marks, T., Mayol, A., & DeMayo, R. (1985). Depressive self-schemas, life stress, and vulnerability to depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 308–319.Google Scholar
  22. Ingram, R. E., Miranda, J., & Segal, Z.V. (1998). Cognitive vulnerability to depression. NewYork: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kwon, P., & Whisman, M. A. (1998). Sociotropy and autonomy as vulnerabilities to specific life events: Issues in life event categorization. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(4), 353–362.Google Scholar
  24. Mazure, C., Raghavan, C., Maciejewski, P. K., Jacobs, S. C., & Bruce, M. L. (2001). Cognitive-personality characteristics as predictors of unipolar major depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(2), 215–225.Google Scholar
  25. Monroe, S. M., & Roberts, J. E. (1990). Conceptualizing and measuring life stress: Problems, principles, procedures, progress. Stress Medicine, 6, 209–216.Google Scholar
  26. Robins, C. J. (1990). Congruence of personality and life events in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 393–397.Google Scholar
  27. Robins, C. J., Bagby, R. M., Rector, N. A., Lynch, T. R., & Kennedy, S.H. (1997). Sociotropy, autonomy, and patterns of symptoms in patients with major depression:Acomparison of dimensional and categorical approaches. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 285–300.Google Scholar
  28. Robins, C. J., Hayes, A. M., Block, P., Kramer, R. J., & Villena, M. (1995). Interpersonal and achievement concerns and the depressive vulnerability and symptom specificity hypotheses: A prospective study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Robins, C. J., Ladd, J., Welkowitz, J., Blaney, P. H., Diaz, R., & Kutcher, G. (1994). The Personal Style Inventory: Preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 277–300.Google Scholar
  30. Rude, S. S., & Burnham, B. L. (1993). Do interpersonal and achievement vulnerabilities interact with congruent events to predict depression? Comparison of DEQ, SAS, DAS, and combined scales. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 531–548.Google Scholar
  31. Segal, Z. V., Shaw, B. F., & Vella, D. D. (1989). Life stress and depression: A test of the congruency hypothesis for life event content and depressive subtype. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 389–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chitra Raghavan
    • 1
  • Huynh-Nhu Le
    • 1
  • Howard Berenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign

Personalised recommendations