Abstract
The sociology of organizations offers conceptual tools that can be used bycriminologists. The logic of crossing intra-disciplinary boundaries to borrowconceptual tools rests in the analogical properties of structure and processacross social settings that are fundamental aspects of all social organization.Analogy itself is underrecognized and used as a tool for conceptual thinkingand analysis in sociology. In this article, I give examples of theories andconcepts from the sociology of organizations that can usefully be appliedto substantive criminological problems. Then I compare family violence andcorporate crime as examples of organizational misconduct, foregroundingthe organizational setting in order to examine links between micro-, meso-,and macro-levels of analysis. These two exercises demonstrate thatincorporating organization theory into criminological research can providenew insights in data analysis of substantive problems, build toward generalsociological theory, and toward integrative general criminological theorythat escapes the levels of explanation problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, Jeffrey, Giesen, Bernhard, Munch, Richard and Neil J. Smelser, eds., The Micro-Macro Link (Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1987).
Allison, Graham and Phillip Zelikow, Essence of Decision. 2nd ed. (New York: Longman, 1999).
Baker, Wayne and Robert Faulkner, “The Social Organization of Conspiracy,” American Sociological Review 1993 (58), 837–860.
Bamberger, P.A. and William J. Sonnenstuhl, eds., Organizational Deviance, Vol. 15, In Research in Organizational Behavior (Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1998).
Braithwaite, John, Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984).
Clinard, Marshall B. and Peter C. Yeager, Corporate Crime (New York: Free Press, 1980).
Coleman, James W., “Toward an Integrated Theory of White-Collar Crime,” American Journal of Sociology 1987 (93), 406–439.
Connell, R.W., Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987).
Edelman, Lauren B., “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace” American Journal of Sociology 1990 (95), 1401–1440.
Edelman, Lauren B., “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” American Journal of Sociology 1992 (97), 1531–1576.
Edelman, Lauren B. and Mark Suchman, “Legal Environments of Organizations,” Annual Review of Sociology 1997 (23), 479–515.
Ermann, M. David and Richard J. Lundman, “Deviant Acts by Complex Organizations: Deviance and Social Control at the Organizational Level of Analysis.” Sociological Quarterly 1978a (19), 55–65.
Ermann, M. David and Richard J. Lundman, Corporate and Governmental Deviance: Problems of Organizational Behavior in Contemporary Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978b).
Ermann, M. David and Gary Rabe, “Organizational Processes (Not Rational Choice) Produce Most Corporate Crimes,” in M.A. Cohen, William S. Lofquist and Gary Rabe (eds.), Debating Corporate Crime (Cincinnati: Anderson, 1997).
Farberman, H., “A Criminogenic Market Structure: The Automobile Industry,” Sociological Quarterly 1975 (16) 438–457.
Felson, Marcus, Crime in Everyday Life: Insights and Implications, 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, 1998).
Finney, H.C. and H.R. Lesieur, “A Contingency Theory of Organizational Crime,” in S.B. Bacharach (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Greenwich Ct: JAI Press 1982) pp. 255–299.
Geis, Gilbert, “The Heavy Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases of 1961,” in Marshall B. Clinard and Richard Quinney (eds.), Criminal Behavior Systems (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1967) pp. 139–151.
Giallombardo, Rose, Society of Women (New York: John Wiley, 1967).
Giddens, Anthony, Central Problems in Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).
Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).
Granovetter, Mark, “Economic Action and Social Structure,” American Journal of Sociology 1985 (91), 481–510.
Hazelrigg, Lawrence, ed., Prison Within Society: A Reader in Penology (Garden City NJ: Anchor, 1968).
Heimer, Carol A., “Explaining Variation in the Impact of Law: Organizations, Institutions, and Professions,” Studies in Law, Politics & Society 1996 (15), 29–59.
Heimer, Carol A., “Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care,” Law & Society Review 1999 (33), 17–66.
Jackall, Robert, Moral Mazes (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Jamieson, Kathryn, The Organization of Corporate Crime (Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 1994).
Katz, Jack, Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil (New York: BasicBooks, 1988).
Klein, Gary, Sources of Power (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998).
Kram, Kathy E., Peter C. Yeager and Gary Reed, “Decisions and Dilemmas: The Ethical Dimension in the Corporate Context,” in J.E. Post (ed.), 11 Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 1989 (21).
Kramer, Ronald C., “Corporate Crime: An Organizational Perspective,” in Peter Widman and Tim Daily (eds.), White-Collar and Economic Crime (Lexington MA: Lexington Books, 1982) pp. 75–94.
Leonard, William N. and Marvin Weber, “Automakers and Dealers: A Study of Criminogenic Market Forces,” Law & Society Review 1970 (4), 407–424.
Manning, Peter K., Organizational Communication (New York: Aldine, 1992).
March, James G., A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (New York: Free Press, 1994).
March, James and Johan Olsen, Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 1979).
March, James and Herbert Simon, Organizations (New York: Wiley, 1958).
Needleman, Martin and Carolyn Needleman, “Organizational Crime: Two Models of Criminogenesis,” Sociological Quarterly 1979 (20), 517–528.
Paternoster, Ray and Sally S. Simpson, “A Rational Choice Theory of Corporate Crime,” in R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (eds.), 5 Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory 37 (New Brunswick: Transaction Press, 1993).
Paternoster, Ray and Sally S. Simpson, “Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime,” Law and Society Review 1996 (30), 549.
Perrow, Charles B., Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (Glenview IL: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1984).
Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald Salancik, The External Control of Organizations (New York: Harper and Row, 1978).
Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
Quinney, E. Richard, “Occupational Structure and Criminal Behavior: Prescription Violations of Retail Pharmacists,” Social Problems 1963 (11), 179–185.
Reiss, Albert J., Jr., “The Study of Deviant Behavior: Where the Action Is,” The Ohio Valley Sociologist 1966 (32), 1–12.
Reiss, Albert J., Jr., “Discretionary Justice,” in Daniel Glaser (ed.), Handbook of Criminology (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1974) pp. 679–699.
Reiss, Albert J., Jr. and David Bordua, “Environment and Organization: A Perspective on the Police” in David Bordua (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays (New York: John Wiley, 1967) pp. 25–55.
Shrager, Laura and James F. Short, Jr., “Toward a Sociology of Organizational Crime,” Social Problems 1978 (25), 405–419.
Simon, Herbert, Models of Man: Social and Rational (New York: Wiley, 1957). Simon, Herbert, Administrative Behavior 3rd ed. (New York: Free Press, 1976).
Simpson, Sally S., “The Decomposition of Antitrust: Testing a Multi-Level Longitudinal Model of Profit-Squeeze,” American Sociological Review 1986 (51) 859–887.
Simpson, Sally S., “Corporate Crime Deterrence and Corporate-Control Policies,” in K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds.), White-Collar Crime Reconsidered (Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press, 1992) p. 289.
Simpson, Sally S., Why Corporations Obey the Law (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).
Simpson, Sally S. and Christopher Koper, “Deterring Corporate Crime,” Criminology 1992 (30), 347.
Stinchcombe, Arthur L., “Social Structure and Organizations,” in James G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1965) pp. 142–193.
Sutherland, Edwin H., White-Collar Crime (New York: Dryden Press, 1949).
Title, Charles R. and Raymond Paternoster, Social Deviance and Crime: An Organizational and Theoretical Approach (Los Angeles: Roxbury, 2000).
Vaughan, Diane, Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).
Vaughan, Diane, “Theory Elaboration: The Heuristics of Case Analysis,” in Charles C. Ragin and Howard S. Becker (eds.), What is a Case: Exploring the Foundation of Social Inquiry (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992a).
Vaughan, Diane, “The Macro-Micro Connection in ‘White-Collar Crime’ Theory,” in Kip Schlegel and David Weisburd (eds.), White-Collar Crime Reconsidered (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992b).
Vaughan, Diane, “Rational Choice, Situated Action, and the Social Control of Organizations,” Law & Society Review 1998 (32), 23–61.
Vaughan, Diane, “The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster,” Annual Review of Sociology 1999a (25), 271–305.
Vaughan, Diane, “The Macro-Micro Connection, Culture, and Boundary Work,” in Patricia Ewick, Robert Kagan and Austin Sarat (eds.), Social Science, Social Policy, and Law (New York: Russell Sage, 1999b) pp. 289–319.
Vaughan, Diane, Theorizing: Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002) ms. in preparation.
Waring, Elin and David Weisburd, eds., Crime and Social Organization vol 10, Advances in Criminological Theory (New Brunswick: Transaction, 2000) forthcoming.
Weick, Karl E., The Social Psychology of Organizing 2nd. ed. (Reading MA: Addison Wesley, 1979).
Weick, Karl E., Sensemaking in Organizations (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995).
West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman, “Doing Gender,” in Judith Lorber and Susan A. Farrell (eds.), The Social Construction of Gender (Newbury Park: Sage, 1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaughan, D. Criminology and the sociology of organizations. Crime, Law and Social Change 37, 117–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014515700746
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014515700746