Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of root restriction and ethylene exposure on apicaldominance of petunia (Petunia xhybrida Hort. Vilm.-Andr.)

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing rooting volume restricted root growth during theproduction of Petunia x hybrida'Orchid’ and resulted in an unfavorable increase in apicaldominance. Exposing young petunia seedlings to ethylene counteracted theeffects of root restriction. Rooting volumes of 9, 28, 58, or 160mL restricted the development of lateral shoots, therebyincreasing apical dominance compared to plants grown in 162 mLrooting volumes. Ethephon, an ethylene-producing compound, increased thedevelopment of lateral shoots of seedlings grown in rooting volumes rangingfrom 28 mL to 160 mL. At a rooting volume of 9mL, ethylene exposure was not capable of reducing the growth ofthe main shoot; apical dominance remained strong in both the control andethephon-treated plants. Because lateral shoot development was not restrictedby rooting volumes greater than 160 mL, exposing these plants toethylene did not result in supplementary lateral shoot development. Levels ofindole-3-acetic acid (IAA), isopentenyladenosine (iPA), and zeatin riboside(ZR) decreased on a whole shoot basis as rooting volume decreased from 162 to58 mL. Indoleacetic acid levels in ethephon-exposed plantsdecreased 20% compared to the control. The cytokinins iPA and ZR showedno response to ethylene exposure; however, the ratio of auxin/cytokinindecreased 24% compared to the control. The decrease in theauxin/cytokinin ratio was associated with an increase in the number and lengthof lateral shoots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeles F.B., Morgan P.W. and Saltveit M.E. 1992. Ethylene in Plant Biology. 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi B.G., Maher B.R. and Cohen J.D. 1989. Hydrolysis of indole-3-acetic acid esters exposed to mild alkaline conditions. Plant Physiol. 91: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangerth F. 1994. Response of cytokinin concentration in the xylem exudate of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to decapitation and auxin treatment, and relationship to apical dominance. Planta. 194: 439–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal A. and Pressman E. 1996. Root restriction and potassium and calcium solution concentrations affect dry-matter production, cation uptake, and blossom-end rot in greenhouse tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121: 649–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry R.M. and Kays S.J. 1988. Application of ethylene-releasing compounds in agriculture. In: Neumann P. (ed.), Plant Growth and Leaf-applied Chemicals. CRC Press, Fla, pp. 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertling I. and Bangerth F. 1995. Changes in hormonal pattern of the new growth of Sclerocarya birrea after rejuvenation treatment with GA3 and “heading back”. Gartenbauwissenschaft. 66: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A. and Heuer B. 1981. The role of roots in control of bean shoot growth. Ann. Bot. 48: 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A., Hesketh J.D., Enos W.T. and Peters D.B. 1983. Interrelationships between shoot growth and photosynthesis as affected by root growth restriction. Photosynthetica. 17: 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline M., Wessel T. and Iwamura H. 1997. Cytokinin/auxin control of apical dominance in Ipomoea nil. Plant Cell Physiol. 38: 659–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting J.G., Lishman A.W., Hofman P.J. and Wolstenholme B.N. 1986b. Plant growth substance trends in developing avocado fruit as determined by radioimmunoassay. Acta. Hort. 175: 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting J.G., Lishman A.W., Hoven A. and Wolstenholme B.N. 1983. Development of a radioimmunoassay for the cytokinin isopentenyladenosine. Crop Prod. 12: 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubik S.P., Krizek D.T. and Stimart D.P. 1989. Influence of root zone restriction on morphogenetic responses of spreading euonymus (E. kiautschovica Loes. 'sieboldiana'). J. of Plant Nutrition. 12: 1021–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery R.J.N., Longnecker N.E. and Atkins C.A. 1998. Branch development in Lupinus angustifolia L. II. Relationship with endogenous ABA, IAA and cytokinins in axillary and main stem buds. J. of Exp. Botany. 49: 555–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest L.C. and Valdovinos J.G. 1971. Regulation of auxin levels in Coleus blumei by ethylene. Plant Physiol. 48: 402–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haver D.L. 1998. The role of ethylene in controlling the auxin/cytokinin ratio in petunia. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Riverside, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee H.J., Horsch R.B., Hinchee M.A., Hein M. and Hoffmann N.L. 1987. The effects of overproduction of two Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA auxin biosynthetic gene products in transgenic petunia plants. Genes & Dev. 1: 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee H. and Estelle M. 1991. Molecular genetic approaches to plant hormone biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 529–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer J.G. 1991. Container size and shape influence growth and landscape performance of marigold seedlings. Hortscience. 26: 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M. and Knegt E. 1977. Influence of ethylene on indole-3-acetic acid concentration in etiolated pea epicotyl tissues. Plant Physiol. 60: 475–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A. and Latimer J.G. 1995. Root cell volume in the planter flat affects watermelon seedling development and fruit yield. Hortscience. 30: 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald E.M.S., Akiyoshi D.E. and Morris R.O. 1981. Combined high-performance liquid chromatography-radioimmunoassay for cytokinins. J. Chromatogr. 214: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • NeSmith D.S. 1993. Influence of root restriction on two cultivars of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). J. of Plant Nutrition. 16: 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson T.A., Cohen J.D., Buta J. and Krizek D.T. 1991. Influence of root restriction on tomato: Changes in leaf cell expansion, abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Physiol. 96: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson T.A., Reinsel M.D. and Krizek D.T. 1991a. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. 'Better Bush') plant response to root restriction. 1. Alteration of plant morphology. J. of Exp. Bot. 42: 1233–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson T.A., Reinsel M. and Krizek D.T. 1991b. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. 'Better Bush') plant response to root restriction. 2. Root respiration and ethylene generation. J. of Exp. Bot. 42: 1241–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins N.S. and Pharr D.M. 1988. Effect of restricted root growth on carbohydrate metabolism and whole plant growth of Cucumis sativus L. Plant Physiol. 87: 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smigocki A.C. and Owens L.D. 1989. Cytokinin-to-auxin ratios and morphology of shoots and tissues transformed by a chimeric isopentenyl transferase gene. Plant Physiol. 91: 808–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttle J.C. 1988. Effect of ethylene treatment on polar IAA transport, net IAA uptake and specific binding of N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid in tissues and microsomes isolated from etiolated pea epicotyls. Plant Physiol. 88: 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Iersel M. 1997. Root restriction effects on growth and development of salvia (Salvia splendens). Hortscience. 32: 1186–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler E.W. 1980. Radioimmunoassay for trans-zeatin and related cytokinins. Planta. 149: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haver, D., Schuch, U. Influence of root restriction and ethylene exposure on apicaldominance of petunia (Petunia xhybrida Hort. Vilm.-Andr.). Plant Growth Regulation 35, 187–196 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014491400397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014491400397

Navigation