Abstract
Differences in fruit-set success reputed to exist between Heveabrasiliensis genetic clones were verified by an analysis of breeding recordsfor the clones PB 5/51, RRIM 600 and PR 107. Although the bestfruit-set success was obtained with PB 5/51 following artificial (hand)pollination, this clonal trait was not reflected in terms of greater numbersof pollen tubes developing it the styles of hand-pollinated PB 5/51 femaleflowers. It was observed, however, that more pollen tubes reached theovules in PB 5/51 than in RRIM 600 or PR 107. Significantly, PB 5/51female flowers required fewer pollen tubes to effect penetration of all threeof its ovules. As fruit formation in Hevea is dependent on all threeovules of the flower being successfully fertilised, PB 5/51 female flowershave hence a greater propensity for successful fruit-set. In all the threeclones studied, the frequency distribution of female flowers with 0, 1, 2 or3 of the ovules penetrated by pollen tubes did not conform to binomialexpectations. Flowers with no ovule penetrated and flowers with all threeovules penetrated were greatly over-represented. One explanation for thisnon-random distribution is the existence of `receptive' female flowers thatfavour successful fertilisation whereas `non-receptive' flowers tend to remainunfertilised even when hand-pollinated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attanayake, D.P.S.T. & S.C. Dharmaratna, 1984. Preliminary observations on flowering, pollen germination and fruit-set in Hevea species. J Rubb Res Inst Sri Lanka 62: 41–46.
Bouharmont, J., 1962. Fécondation de l'ovule et développment de la graine après croisement et autopolinisation chez Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. Cellule 62: 119–130.
Harihar, G. & H.Y. Yeang, 1984. The low fruit set that follows conventional hand pollination in Hevea brasiliensis: Insufficiency of pollen as a cause. J Rubb Res Inst Malaysia 32: 20–29.
Hays, W.L., 1981. Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Leconte, A., 1981. La fécondation chez l'Hevea: Cheminement des tubes polliniques dans l'ovaire. Caoutchoucs et Plastiques 616: 85–86.
Leconte, A., 1984. La reproduction sexuée de l'Hevea brasiliensis. Caoutchoucs et Plastiques 637–638: 71–74.
Martin, F.W., 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence microscopy. Stain Tech 34: 125–127.
Rao, B.S., 1961. Pollination of Hevea in Malaya. J Rubb Res Inst Malaya 17: 14–18.
Rubber Research Institute of Malaya, 1961. Ann Rep 1961, p. 40.
Sedgley, M. & D.P.S.T.G. Attanayake, 1986. Floral biology of rubber and recommendations for increases in seed yield for plant breeding. J Rubb Res Inst Sri Lanka 65: 1–13.
Sedgley, M. & D.P.S.T.G. Attanayake, 1988. The breeding system of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis): an evaluation of controlled handpollination methods. Euphytica 39: 83–91.
Simmonds, N.W., 1986. Theoretical aspects of synthetic/polycross populations of rubber seedlings. J nat Rubb Res 1: 1–15.
Sunderasan, E., R. Wickneswari, M.Z.A. Aziz & H.Y. Yeang, 1994. Incidence of self-and cross-pollination in two Hevea brasiliensis clones. J nat Rubb Res 9: 253–257.
Warmke, H.E., 1951. Studies on pollination of Hevea brasiliensis in Puerto Rico. Science 113: 646–648.
Warmke, H.E., 1952. Studies on natural pollination of Hevea brasiliensis in Brazil. Science 116: 474–478.
Wycherley, P.R., 1971. Hevea seed (Part I). Planter 47: 291–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamzah, S., Chan, J. & Yeang, H. Pollen Tube growth and fruit-set success in Hevea brasiliensis hand-pollination influenced by the choice of clone and female flower. Euphytica 123, 1–8 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014486004608
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014486004608