Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 25–35 | Cite as

Behavioral Repertoire, Age Polyethism and Adult Transport in Ectatomma opaciventre (Formicidae: Ponerinae)

  • Marcio R. PieEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study describes the behavioral repertoire of a mature colony of Ectatomma opaciventre Roger. Twenty-eight different behavioral acts were recorded from 4538 individual observations. There was evidence of age polyethism, with young workers performing significantly more brood care and allogrooming than older workers. Experiments were also performed to investigate the behavioral organization of nest relocation in E. opaciventre. This complex social behavior was regulated by a few workers which specialized in transporting nestmates, including other workers, winged gynes, males, and the queen. Winged gynes were also observed performing adult transport. The carrying posture utilized in E. opaciventre is similar to that in other ponerines, although some idiosyncratic features were detected.

ants Ponerinae Ectatomma age polyethism adult transport 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Antonialli-Junior, W. F., and Giannotti, E. (1997). Nest architecture and population dynamics of the Ponerinae ant, Ectatomma opaciventre Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Adv. Zool. 18: 64–71.Google Scholar
  2. Baroni Urbani, C. (1989). Phylogeny and behavioural evolution in ants, with a discussion of the role of behaviour in evolutionary processes. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1: 37–168.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatkar, A. P., and Whitcomb, W. H. (1970). Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla. Entomol. 53: 229–232.Google Scholar
  4. Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, G. L., Aron, S., and Camazine, S. (1997). Selforganization in social insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 188–193.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, W. L., Jr. (1958). Contributions toward a reclassification of Formicidae. II. Tribe Ectatommini (Hymenoptera). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. 118: 175–362.Google Scholar
  6. Calabi, P. (1989). Behavioral flexibility in Hymenoptera: A re-examination of the concept of caste. In Trager, E. J. (ed.), Advances in Myrmecology, Brill Press, Leiden, pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
  7. Corbara, B., Lachaud, J. P., and Fresneau, D. (1989). Individual variability, social structure and division of labour in the ponerine and Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 82: 89–100.Google Scholar
  8. Fénéron, R., Durand, J. L., and Jaisson, P. (1996). Relation between behaviour and physiological maturation in a ponerine ant. Behaviour 133: 791–806.Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez, F. (1991). Las hormigas cazadoras de genero Ectatomma (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) en Colombia. Caldasia 16: 551–564.Google Scholar
  10. Gordon, D. M. (1992). Nest relocation in harvester ants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85: 44–47.Google Scholar
  11. Haskins, C. P., and Haskins, E. F. (1950). Notes on the biology and social behavior of the archaic ponerine ants of the genera Myrmecia and Promyrmecia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 43: 461–491.Google Scholar
  12. Hölldobler, B. (1981). Trail communication in the dacetine ant Orectognathus versicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 88: 245–257.Google Scholar
  13. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E.O. (1986). Ecology and behavior of the primitive cryptobiotic ant Prionopelta amabilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc. 33: 45–58.Google Scholar
  14. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Hölldobler, B., Möglich, M., and Maschwitz, U. (1974). Communication by tandem running in the ant Camponotus sericeus. J. Comp. Physiol. 90: 105–127.Google Scholar
  16. Jaisson, P., Fresneau, D., Taylor, R. W., and Lenoir, A. (1992). Social organization in some primitive Australian ants. I. Nothomyrmecia macrops Clark. Insectes Soc. 39: 425–438.Google Scholar
  17. Jessen, K., and Maschwitz, U. (1986). Orientation and recruitment behavior in the ponerineant Pachycondyla tesserinoda (Emery): Laying of individual-specific trails during tandem running. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 151–155.Google Scholar
  18. Kempf, W. W. (1972). Catálogo abreviado das formigas da região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomol. 15: 3–334.Google Scholar
  19. Lachaud, J.-P., and Fresneau, D. (1987). Social regulation in ponerine ants. In Pasteels, J. M., and Deneubourg, J.-P. (eds.), From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects (Experientia Suppl., Vol. 54), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, P., and Bateson, P. (1986). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Maschwitz, U., Hölldobler, B., and Möglich, M. (1974). Tandemlaufen als Recrutierungsverhalten bei Bothroponera tesserinoda Forel (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Z. Tierpsychol. 35: 11ai3–123.Google Scholar
  22. Möglich, M. (1978). Social organization of nest emigration in Leptothorax (Hym., Form.). Insectes Soc. 25: 205–225.Google Scholar
  23. Möglich, M., and Hölldobler, B. (1974). Social carrying behavior and division of labor during nest moving in ants. Psyche 81: 219–236.Google Scholar
  24. Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O. (1978). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Overal, W. L. (1986). Recrutamento e divisão de trabalho em colônias naturais da formiga Ectatomma quadridens (Fabr.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi 2: 113–135.Google Scholar
  26. Paiva, R. V. S., and Brandão, C. R. F. (1989). Estudos sobre a organização social de Ectatomma permagnum Forel, 1908 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev. Bras. Biol. 49: 783–792.Google Scholar
  27. Peeters, C., and Crewe, R. (1987). Foraging and recruitment in ponerine ants: Solitary hunting in the queenless Ophtalmopone berthoudi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 94: 201–214.Google Scholar
  28. Peeters, C., Hölldobler, B., Moffett, M., and Musthak Ali, T. M. (1994). “Wall-papering” and elaborate nest architecture in the ponerine ant Harpegnatos saltator. Insectes Soc. 41: 211–218.Google Scholar
  29. Pérez-Bautista, M., Lachaud, J.-P., and Fresneau, D. (1985). La división de trabajo en la hormiga primitiva Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fol. Entomol. Mex. 65: 119–130.Google Scholar
  30. Pratt, S. C. (1989). Recruitment and other communication behavior in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum. Ethology 81: 313–331.Google Scholar
  31. Pratt, S. C. (1994). Ecology and behavior of Gnamptogenys horni (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Insectes Soc. 41: 255–262.Google Scholar
  32. Traniello, J. F. A. (1978). Caste in a primitive ant: Absence of age polyethism in Amblyopone. Science 202: 770–772.Google Scholar
  33. Traniello, J. F. A., and Jayasuriya, A. K. (1985). The biology of the primitive ant Aneuretus simoni (Emery) (Formicidae: Aneuretinae). II. The social ethogram and division of labor. Insectes Soc. 32: 375–388.Google Scholar
  34. Valenzuela-Gonzales, J., Lopez-Mendez, A., and Garcia-Ballinas, A. (1994). Ciclo de actividad y aprovisionamiento de Pachycondyla villosa (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) en agroecosistemas cacaoteros del Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Fol. Entomol. Mex. 91: 9–21.Google Scholar
  35. Villet, M. H. (1992). The social biology of Hagensia havilandi (Forel, 1901) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and the origin of queenlessness in ponerinae ants. Trop. Zool. 5: 195–206.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, E. O. (1971). The Insect Societies, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, E. O. (1976). A social ethogram of the neotropical arboreal ant Zacryptocerus varians (Fr. Smith). Anim. Behav. 24: 354–363.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, E. O., and Hölldobler, B. (1986). Ecology and behavior of the Neotropical cryptobiotic ant Basiceros manni (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Basicerotini). Insectes Soc. 33: 70–84.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, E. O., and Fagen, R. M. (1974). On the estimation of the total behavioral repertories in ants. J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 82: 106–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Zoologia, IBUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas SPBrazil

Personalised recommendations